Authors: George D Chloros, Christos D Kakos, Ioannis K Tastsidis, Vasileios P Giannoudis, Michalis Panteli, Peter V Giannoudis
Categories: Foot & Ankle, fifth metatarsal, fracture, review, treatment, Fifth Metatarsal, Fracture, Treatment, Review
Source: EFORT Open Reviews
Doi: 10.1530/EOR-21-0025
Authors: George D Chloros, Christos D Kakos, Ioannis K Tastsidis, Vasileios P Giannoudis, Michalis Panteli, Peter V Giannoudis
Even though fifth metatarsal fractures represent one of the most common injuries of the lower limb, there is no consensus regarding their classification and treatment, while the term ‘Jones’ fracture has been used inconsistently in the literature.In the vast majority of patients, Zone 1 fractures are treated non-operatively with good outcomes.Treatment of Zone 2 and 3 fractures remains controversial and should be individualized according to the patient’s needs and the ‘personality’ of the fracture.If treated operatively, anatomic reduction and intramedullary fixation with a single screw, with or without biologic augmentation, remains the ‘gold standard’ of management; recent reports however report good outcomes with open reduction and internal fixation with specifically designed plating systems.Common surgical complications include hardware failure or irritation of the soft tissues, refracture, non-union, sural nerve injury, and chronic pain.Patients should be informed of the different treatment options and be part of the decision process, especially where time for recovery and returning to previous activities is of essence, such as in the case of high-performance, elite athletes.
Metatarsal fractures represent the most common injury of the foot, accounting for approximately 5–6% of all the fractures encountered in the primary care setting, with about 45–70% of these injuries involving the fifth metatarsal (1). Their incidence has been reported as high as 1.8 per 1000 person-years, with patients most frequently presenting between 20 and 50 years of age (2). Noteworthy, the majority of young patients are males, whereas older patients are females (3). In elite athletes (4), a 5-year review from a single National Football League (NFL) team demonstrated an incidence of 3.42% (5). Besides football, other sports with an increased risk of suffering these fractures include soccer, basketball, and track and field athletes (4, 6). Sir Robert Jones was the first who described the metaphyseal–diaphyseal (within 0.75 inches from the base) fifth metatarsal fracture in four patients in Liverpool in 1902, with himself sustaining the same injury while dancing (7). Nowadays, the term ‘Jones fracture’ defines just one type of the fifth metatarsal fracture, that is a ‘Zone 2’ injury, and there are several misconceptions and controversies regarding the terminology and treatment of these injuries. The purpose of the herein study is to provide an update in regard to the evaluation, management, and outcomes of these important and frequent injuries.
Several specific anatomical considerations are crucial in assessing the healing potential and therefore the management of these injuries. Four structures attach on the fifth metatarsal base, dorsally; peroneus brevis attaches at the tubercle, peroneus tertius at the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction, and abductor digiti minimi and the lateral band of the plantar fascia on the plantar-lateral aspect (8) (Fig. 1). In addition, the proximal part of the fifth metatarsal is relatively fixed by strong ligaments attaching to the cuboid and other metatarsals, whereas its shaft remains mobile. It is these features that account for the increased propensity of delayed union/non-union in the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction, and additionally, the stresses exerted at the mobile metatarsal head, which are directed to the base, using the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction as a fulcrum (8). Additionally, two sesamoid bones, the os peroneum (inside the peroneus longus tendon) and os vesalianum (just proximal to the fifth metatarsal base), should be differentiated from fractures, having a smooth contour (9). Most importantly, there is a watershed area at the metaphysis–diaphysis junction between the proximal metaphyseal blood supply and the diaphyseal part of the bone supplied by the nutrient artery which is greatly responsible for the highest risk of delayed union/non-union of these fractures (10, 11) (Fig. 2). Finally, the sural nerve is very close to the entry point for intramedullary screw fixation and should be identified and protected during reconstructive procedures (12). Figure 1Schematic drawing showing the pertinent anatomy of the fifth metatarsal including Zones 1, 2, and 3. Zone 1 involves the tuberosity, Zone 2 the 4–5 intermetatarsal articulation (arrows), and Zone 3 is within 1.5 cm of the proximal metaphysis. (Obtained with permission from George D. Chloros, MD.) Figure 2Vascular supply of the fifth metatarsal showing the watershed area in Zone 2 (gray). (Obtained with permission from George D. Chloros, MD.)
Kavanagh et al. in a force platform analysis demonstrated that a vertical or medial lateral force is often required for a fracture to occur (13). Inversion injuries are responsible for tuberosity avulsion fractures (14), where peroneus brevis is already contracted during stance phase and has the potential of pulling the tuberosity fragment when the plantarly flexed foot is subjected to an inversion stress; the firm attachment of the lateral band of plantar aponeurosis, on the other hand, is implicated for fractures distally to the tuberosity (15, 16, 17, 18). Furthermore, Gu used a three-dimensional model to study stress loads on the metatarsals during landing, reporting that one of the peak stress points was in the proximal fifth metatarsal. When he changed the angle of landing, he noticed that the lateral metatarsal stress surged during inversion (19). A weak toe-grip strength may also predispose a fifth metatarsal fracture by decreasing the dynamic balance ability which may lead to overloading of the lateral side of the foot (20). Athletes who encounter a Jones fracture apply increased forces at the base of the fifth metatarsal during common sports activities (21).
There are many predisposing biomechanical factors which can shift weight to the lateral foot and cause a Zone 2 or Zone 3 fifth metatarsal fracture. In a cadaveric study, Aronow et al. demonstrated that isolated gastrocnemius or triceps surae contractures transmit weight-bearing forces from the hindfoot to the midfoot and forefoot (22). Congenital bone malstructure such as plantar malunion of fifth metatarsal or dorsal malunion of any of the first four metatarsals can also provoke relative plantarflexion of fifth metatarsal’s head and cause a shear force carried by the fifth metatarsal. Obese patients are more prone to Zone 3 fractures due to secondary biomechanical and metabolic consequences of excessive adipose tissue (23). A recent radiographic analysis of 51 NFL players showed that a long, straight, narrow fifth metatarsal possesses a greater risk for Jones fracture (24). Tibia vara, varus hindfoot (25), forefoot adduction (26), genu varum heel (14), and metatarsus adductus (27) have also been associated with increased load to the lateral column.
Over the years, numerous classification schemes have been created, the first one reported by Stewart in 1960 based on the fracture location and morphology (28). Type I is an extra-articular fracture between the metatarsal base and the diaphysis, type II an intra-articular fracture of the metatarsal base, type III an avulsion fracture of the base, type IV a comminuted fracture with intra-articular extension, and type V a partial avulsion of the metatarsal bone with or without a fracture. Fifteen years later, Dameron et al. observed differences in healing between fractures of fifth metatarsal tuberosity and fractures distal to the insertion of the peroneus brevis (29). Based on these findings, Lawrence and Botte later divided proximal fractures into three anatomic zones (14, 29, 30) (Fig. 1):
Fractures occurring at the regions distal to Zone 3 are termed as ‘Dancer’s fractures‘. They are typically spiral fractures occurring from rotational forces to the axially loaded, plantarflexed foot. In addition, fractures of fifth metatarsal’s head can be intra-articular or extra-articular. The injury comes after a direct force to the plantar, dorsal, or lateral foot, and the result is usually an extra-articular fracture which involves also the neck.
For delayed patient presentations, the classification which is most widely used nowadays was developed by Torg, who subdivided Dameron’s Zones 2 and 3 (former Jones’ and proximal diaphysis fracture) into three categories, according to radiological appearances and healing status (33, 34, 35). These three types need adjusted management strategies and help the physician to determine the age of the fracture at
The patient’s history and physical examination is extremely important to differentiate between an acute vs a stress fracture. Patients with acute fifth metatarsal fractures present with pain, localized swelling and tenderness, difficulty in walking or weight-bearing, and in some cases, ecchymosis. On the contrary, patients presenting with stress reactions or fractures complain about pain only during activity in the prodromal phase, with these symptoms commonly being present for several weeks (29, 36). Generally, patients are able to localize the pain to the area of the fracture, while foot inversion from 30 to 50° results in maximal strain and increased symptoms. Note that there is very limited mobility at the fracture site and therefore absence of crepitus or palpable gap.
Predisposing factors for stress fractures such as previous history of a stress fracture, recent intense (or change in) activity, osteopenia, and endocrinopathies (diabetes mellitus, hyperparathyroidism, nutrient deficiencies, amenorrhea, etc.) should be identified. Serum calcium, vitamin D, nutritional deficiencies, and history of menstrual cycle irregularity in females should be evaluated, as these can unveil metabolic bone pathologies. Finally, a comprehensive foot and ankle examination is of paramount importance, with the entire lower limb being evaluated for the presence of axial deformity, such as pes cavus or genu varum.
For reducing radiation exposure, the Ottawa Foot Rules have been introduced, as an extension of the Ottawa Ankle Rules and indicate that the clinical assessment of every subtle ankle injury should encompass palpation of both malleoli, navicular bone, and base of the fifth metatarsal (37). A foot injury requires radiographic evaluation if the patient has pain in the midfoot and if any of the following is present, bony tenderness at the base of the fifth metatarsal, bony tenderness at the navicular, and inability to bear weight taking four steps both immediately and in the emergency room. The reported sensitivity and specificity of these rules are 100 and 70%, respectively (38).
Three standard, weight-bearing views are necessary, anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and 30- or 45-degree oblique view, with the latter being the most helpful for the anatomic classification. If the patient cannot tolerate pain with weight-bearing, mild supination can be added to the lateral view in order to minimize osseous overlap. Yet, as much as 77% of avulsion fractures (particularly those at the tip of the tuberosity) may be missed on standard foot radiographs (39), and a supplementary AP view of the ankle including the base of the proximal fifth metatarsal should be obtained (40).
It must be stressed that radiographic features of stress fractures are usually absent in the early stages. Well-differentiated linear lucencies usually appear 2–6 weeks after the original insult, with variable degree of periosteal reaction (41). MRI and technetium bone scan may guide the physician in equivocal cases in the early stages (42, 43). CT may be used to evaluate delayed union/non-union, confirm healing, or refracture. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (44) may be useful in cases of multiple refractures or recurring non-unions. Finally, a metabolic workup may be warranted, including screening of vitamin D levels (45, 46).
Conservative or surgical treatment is decided based on the fracture type, associated injuries, and individual patient characteristics. There is a plethora of non-operative treatment modalities, including elastic bandage support, non-weight-bearing casting, a hard-soled shoe, short-leg walking casts, and a cam walker boot (47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52). Various surgical techniques exist, with intramedullary screw fixation (6, 13, 36, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59) with or without bone grafting, tension band constructs (60), and low-profile plates (61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67).
In general, surgery is contraindicated in neuropathic feet, presence of vascular insufficiency, and local infection (68). However, diabetic patients with intact sensation and vascular supply are eligible for surgical management (69). When there is a secondary predisposing factor such as a limb axial deformity, for example pes cavovarus, this should also be addressed otherwise it will eventually lead to therapeutic failure (70).
Dameron (71) was the first to report clinical healing as high as 97% of tuberosity fractures, within weeks from injury; other teams have also reported equivalent results (30, 35, 72). There is a general agreement that all non-displaced or minimally displaced tuberosity avulsion fractures should be treated conservatively; a systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in union and refracture rates between different conservative methods (73). Elastic wrapping and weight-bearing as tolerated for a period of 3 weeks is adequate (74) and a hard-sole shoe, short-leg cast, or cam walker boot can also be other options (51, 52, 75).
Historically, surgery was recommended for a displacement greater than 2 mm, or comminution in Zone 1 fractures and various operative interventions have been described (76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81). A prospective study showed no benefit of immobilization vs symptomatic treatment for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal (48), while a recent systematic review opted for non-operative treatment, regardless of technique (82). Involvement of more than one-third of the cubometatarsal joint may require open reduction and screw fixation using tension band wiring or a small fragment screw (2.0–2.7 mm) (40, 83, 84); however, the latter is found to be superior (83). A distal ulna hook plate was used with good results for displaced tuberosity avulsion fractures (85). A recent study showed that clinical and radiologic outcomes of operative vs non-operative management of Zone 1 fractures are equivalent (78). In cases of delayed symptomatic presentation, excision of the involved proximal fragment is indicated (86). In our practice, it is very rare that we operatively treat Zone 1 fractures, either displaced or undisplaced. Even if the fracture does not ‘heal’ radiographically, a pain-free fibrous union may develop, hence making an operation unnecessary (Fig. 3). Poor outcomes are rare and may be attributed to either a painful fibrous union, joint incongruity, or entrapment of the sural nerve branch inside the callus (86). Figure 3Conservatively managed Zone 1 injury. (A) Injury anteroposterior, oblique, and lateral radiographs showing a Zone 1 injury. (B) At 6 weeks, the patient went into a fibrous painless union. (Obtained with permission from George D. Chloros, MD.)
Optimal management of these fractures is controversial and treatment is individualized to patient’s needs and expectations. One of the problems is that the term ‘Jones fracture’ has been inconsistently used to include both Zone 2 and Zone 3 fractures (49, 87). In general, the ‘true Jones’ fractures should be treated with non-weight-bearing, as weight-bearing has been implicated in increased incidence of non-union (54), although there has also been a trend toward ‘functional treatment’ consisting of full weight-bearing accompanied by full range of motion (49, 50). Several authors have reported successful conservative treatment (50, 88, 89). However, because of the watershed area of the region, non-union rates of Zones 2 and 3 have been reported to be up to 21% after non-operative management (84, 90, 91, 92). Healing starts from a medial to lateral direction and callus is seen by 6–8 weeks. Where there is absence of callus within this period, a trial of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy may be used with a reported healing union time of 3 months, range 2–4 months (93). Portland recorded a 100% success in union after prompt screw fixation in 22 patients (94), while a randomized trial reported 44% of failure after cast treatment of acute Jones fracture vs operative treatment (95). Porter after utilizing a 4.5-mm (96) cannulated screw fixation in athletes showed a 100% union rate and no refractures, with a 7.5 week mean time for return to sports (97). Low et al. studied 86 athletes of NFL, showing a union rate of 94 vs 80% for operative and non-operative treatments, respectively (98). Several systematic reviews conclude that surgery results in shorter union times and lower number of delayed union or non-unions (80, 99, 100, 101).
Intramedullary screw fixation with or without grafting is being widely performed (6, 13, 36, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59) (Fig. 4). To avoid complications such as hardware failure (Fig. 5) and refracture (102), several studies have been conducted to assess the properties a screw should have to achieve reduction and compression at the fracture site. The diameter of the screw should be no less than 4.5 mm in order to obtain adequate compression across the fracture line, and the largest screw possible which will achieve maximal contact interface with the dense cortical bone should always be used (97, 103, 104, 105, 106). Radiographic studies confirmed that excessive screw length should be avoided by keeping screw length less than 68% of length of fifth metatarsal (104). Interestingly, there was no correlation between age, straight segment length, and canal diameter. There were differences noted (not statistically significant) between male and female coronal canal diameter (5.2–4.8 mm) and at the curvature of the fifth metatarsal (104). The surgeon should take this into consideration with their K-wire insertion. Figure 4(A) Pre-operative anteroposterior and oblique radiographs showing a Zone 3 injury. (B) Intra-operative fluoroscopic images showing placement of an intramedullary screw. (C) Post-operative anteroposterior and oblique radiographs at 3 months showing complete healing. (Obtained with permission from George D. Chloros, MD) Figure 5(A) Post-operative view of a relatively small, thin intramedullary screw. (B) A 2-month post-operative radiograph demonstrates hardware failure. (Obtained with permission from George D. Chloros, MD)
Regarding the surgical technique for fresh fractures, the patient is placed supine on a radiolucent table with a bolster under the ipsilateral hip and a tourniquet is applied. The alignment of the fifth metatarsal is drawn with a marking pen and a 1 cm incision is made at the proximal aspect about 2–3 cm proximal to the base and parallel to the fifth metatarsal canal. Any small sural nerve branches are identified and retracted, and the interval between the peroneus brevis and the lateral band of the plantar fascia is identified and bluntly dissected down to the fifth metatarsal base. The entry point is crucial and is classically described as being ‘high and inside’, that is on the dorsal and medial aspect just medial and superior to the edge of the tuberosity. A guidewire is inserted and advanced into the canal past the fracture and thereafter the cannulated drill was passed over the guidewire to be on the fracture site several times in an attempt to break up the intramedullary sclerosis if present. Depending on the pre-operatively templated size, a smaller, for example a 5.5-mm, cannulated tap is initially used over the guidewire and based upon its clearance on fluoroscopy the appropriate size cannulated tap for example a 6.5 mm is finally used. The tap is removed, and finally an appropriate length solid screw is advanced into the canal to achieve excellent fracture compression, prevent bowing and plantar/lateral gapping. Cannulated screws are not preferred because of their lesser strength (107) and association with refractures and non-unions (108).
In cases of surgery on delayed/non-unions (Torg II and III types), the incision is from 0.5 cm proximal tuberosity to just distal to the fracture site, usually about 3 cm in total length. At the distal aspect of the incision the fracture site is exposed, cleared of all tissue, and the sclerosis taken down with a high-speed bur and 2.0 mm guidewires are used to make multiple drill holes in its proximal and distal aspect. The cannulated drill is passed several times at the fracture site in an attempt to break up the intramedullary sclerosis. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate, as well as autograft, is packed to the non-union site, and subsequently, a solid screw is passed as previously described. Final fluoroscopic images are obtained in multiple planes. Possible complications include refracture (102), sural nerve injury (12), malunion, delayed union/non-union, prominence of the screwhead, or chronic low level pain (109). Proper surgical technique and appropriate post-operative protocols are the keys to minimizing those complications. In athletes, relatively high refracture rates have been reported, up to 30% (6), and therefore alternative approaches may be adopted such as plate fixation (61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67). A cadaveric study from Duplantier showed promising results of plantar-lateral plate fixation, as plates could resist more the tension forces from fifth metatarsal and tolerate greater peak load to failure than intramedullary screws (110). In a recent study of plantar plate fixation in 38 athletes, there was a 10.5% rate of refracture and symptomatic hardware (111), however previous studies had shown no problems as far as union or refractures (63, 64, 67). This technique may be preferred in cases of a laterally bowed fifth metatarsal or comminuted fractures (112), however further clinical research is needed to better define its role.
In our practice, the treatment is individualized according to the patient’s needs and expectations through an informed consent process. If non-operative treatment is decided, the patient is placed in a short-leg cast, non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks and thereafter they are transitioned to a cam walker boot with weight-bearing as pain allows. As soon as the patient is asymptomatic, physical therapy is initiated with gradual return to activity within 12 weeks is the typical scenario. In cases of stress fractures/reactions, non-weight-bearing is typically prolonged for 12 weeks, and the patient is followed-up closely both clinically and radiographically to determine whether the reaction has subsided, that is diminished sclerosis and re-establishment of the medullary cavity. In case the patient is an operative candidate, an intramedullary screw fixation is our usual standard of care as described above. Post-operatively, the patient is placed in a non-weight-bearing splint after 1 week and transitioned to a non-weight-bearing cast for another 3 weeks, and then progressively transitioned to partial weight-bearing in a removable boot with crutches for another 2 weeks as pain allows. At this point, the patient is allowed to do some level of activity, for example stationary bicycle or swimming. At 6 weeks, the healing is evaluated clinically and radiographically and if the fracture has healed then full weight-bearing is allowed with a gradual return to full activity. If the fracture has not healed, then a bone stimulator is recommended, and the patient will revert back to non-weight-bearing and the healing closely followed clinically and radiographically. In cases of delayed union or non-union, the patient routinely undergoes metabolic workup to correct any deficiencies and is subsequently treated operatively with a primary or revision intramedullary screw and bone grafting ± bone marrow aspirate concentrate as described above. For the competitive athlete, CT confirmation of union is warranted prior to return to full play.
These fractures usually present late, as ‘stress fractures’. If they are acute, a trial of non-weight-bearing cast vs operative treatment (87, 113) is discussed with the patient. However, the latter may be favored in a high-demand individual such as an elite athlete (87, 113). The treatment is similar to Zone 2 injuries (114) as described above.
In general, non-operative treatment is preferred for these fractures and is quite effective leaving no sequela even in competitive athletes (115, 116). In a recent study, 33 patients were treated with a boot or a hard-sole shoe with a minimum of 10 months follow-up and showed excellent outcomes regardless of the degree of displacement, shortening, or rotation. There were 9% delayed unions, however, all patients ultimately united with an average time to union of 8.3 weeks. The hard-sole shoe showed superior outcomes compared to the boot. Of note, despite classically being associated with high-performance athletes, hence the name ‘Dancer’s fracture’, a recent study showed increased incidence in females over the age of 40 and when low energy trauma is involved in that group they should be considered as early fragility fractures and warrant metabolic workup (3).
Although surgical outcomes are widely successful (6, 13, 36, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 80, 94, 97, 99, 100, 101, 106), possible complications include hardware failure (Fig. 5) and refracture (102), sural nerve injury (12), malunion, delayed union/non-union, prominence of the screwhead, chronic low level pain (109), and iatrogenic fractures (12, 36). Table 1 summarizes the causes of non-union following fifth Metatarsal fractures. Table 1Non-union causes fifth metatarsal fractures (74, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124).Patient specificInjury specificSurgeon-specific factorsMedicationsSmoking statusZone 2/Zone 3 fracturesSmall diameter screws (<4.5 mm)NSAIDsDiabeticOpen fracturesSynthetic glucocorticoidsPeripheral vascular diseaseChemotherapy agentsVitamin D/calcium deficiencyHormonal deficiency (e.g. hypothyroidism)Increased ageNSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Refractures or non-unions may occur up to 12% of the intramedullary screw fixation cases (59, 100). However, the rate of refracture in elite athletes may be as high as 30% for intramedullary screw fixation (6) vs 10.5% for plate fixation (111), in recent studies. Table 2 summarizes the literature assessing the incidence of non-union and subsequent treatment strategy. Possible causes of failure may be technically related, for example inappropriate screw size/biology, failure to simultaneously address causative factors such as pes cavus, as well as secondary to inadequate post-operative protocols. In the past, symptomatic hardware has been reported in up to 30% of intramedullary screw fixation patients with a traditional screw, which is now rare with the use of fracture-specific screws (106) and the authors use them routinely (Fig. 4B). Headless screws are not recommended because of difficulty in removal (108). Plate removal has been reported in up to 31% of cases (111). It is important to note that removal of hardware may create stress risers and extreme caution is warranted especially in the case of athletes in which case it is recommended to occur only after retirement and in the meantime managed by shoe modification (117). Table 2Failed non-union treatment causes and rates.ReferencePatients, nPatients (n) with non-unions (M:F)Type of studyInjury pattern sustainedTreatment modalityType of failureTime to failureOther comments (treatment of non-union)Rettig et al. (84)88RCSJones fracture (not further classified)Conservative managementNon-unionUnknownFive non-unions shelled through lateral incision of peroneus brevis;One non union fragment was large and articulated cuboid;2 non-unions healed with screw fixationHolmes Jr et al. (93)9 (5:4)4 (1:3)RCSJones fracture acute type (narrow fracture line) as per TorgTreated conservatively in walking castNon-unionMean duration of use of PEMF was 2.8 months.Pulsed electromagnetic fieldsGlasgow et al. (125)113 (2:1)CSJones fracture (not further classified)Local bone graftRefracture10 monthsLocal graft, persistent canal stenosisCorticocancellous graftRefracture31 monthsShort bone graft persistent canal sclerosis4.5 mm malleolar screwDelayed union, screw deformation10 weeksNoneWright et al. (108)66 (6:0)RCSJones fracture acute type narrow fracture line) as per Torg4.5 mm cannulated screwRefracture7 weeksLimited activity5.0 mm cannulated screwRefracture11 weeks6.0 mm solid screw4.5 mm cannulated screwRefracture8 weeks6.5 mm Herbert screw4.5 mm cannulated screwRefracture12 weeksLimited activity4.0 mm cannulated screwRefracture5.5 weeksBone grafting4.5 mm cannulated screwRefracture6 weeksLimited activityLarson et al. (126)156RCSJones fracture acute type (narrow fracture line) as per Torg5.0 mm cannulated screwRefracture14 weeksInlay graft4.0 mm cannulated screwRefracture18 weeks5.0 mm screw ICBG4.0 mm cannulated screwRefracture44 weeksICBG6.5 mm cannulated screwRefracture16 weeksSliding BG6.5 mm cannulated screwNon-union48 weeksNone4.5 mm cannulated screwNon-union20 weeksAntibiotics 5.0 mm screw & ICBGMologne et al. (95)37 (35:2)6RCTJones fracture acute type (narrow fracture line) as per Torg18 patients cast19 surgical group (4.5 mm malleolar screw)Five non-unions and two refracturesN/ANon-union groupThree patients underwent fixation with 4.5 mm screw. Remaining two declined operation.RefractureOne patient underwent fixation with 4.5 mm screw.One treated conservatively with walking cast boot.One non-unionBone graft and repeat fixationHunt et al. (91)2121 (16:5)RCSJones fracture (Zone II Dameron)5 patients non-operative treatment16 patients previous surgical fixation5 patients symptomatic non-unions16 patients non-unions/refractureN/AEight patients, iliac crest cancellous bone graft.Eight patients, bone marrow aspirate and DBM. Four patients bone graft harvested from calcaneus.One patient, DBM aloneOne patient, no bone graft.Ritchie et al. (127)66RCSJones fracture (Not further ClassifiedSix patients Treated non-operativelySix patients symptomatic non-unionsMean 12.2 monthsExcision of avulsed fragment.Panteli et al. (128)417RCS (abstract)Isolated fifth metatarsal fracture (Lawrence classification)7 (Type I)22 (Type II)12 (Type III)26 Cannulated screwsSeven non-unionsN/ANine patients there was a residual gap following reduction and autologous bone graft12 ORIFThree fragment ExcisionGranata et al. (102)1494 (4:0)RCSJones fracture (not further classified)4.5 mm cannulated stainless steel screwRefracture, bent screw6 monthsThree were revised to a bigger size screw, while orthobiologics and external bone stimulators were also used to augment healing. Fourth patient was revised to the same screw, but also required a second revision surgery for non-union.5.0 mm cannulated stainless steel screwRefracture, bent screw7 months5.0 mm cannulated stainless steel screwRefracture, bent screw2.5 months3.5 mm solid stainless steel screwRefracture, bent screw15 monthsGrant et al. (54)3030 (10:20)PCSThe fracture pattern was categorized using the Dameron classificationZone 1 injuries- Weight bear in walking boot.Zones 2 and Three non-weight-bearing cast for 6 weeks.30 nonon-unionAverage time 5.9 monthsZone 1 injuries1 mm guidewire 90° to fracture. 3 mm compression screwZone 2/3 Injuries1.6 mm guidewirePredrilled 4-mm headed screw is then placed intramedullaryCS, case series; DBM, demineralised bone matrix; RCS, retrospective case series; RCT, randomized controlled trial; PCS, prospective case series; ICBG, Iliac crest bone graft.
Fractures of the fifth metatarsal remain a challenging problem to treat, especially in competitive athletes. In recent years, these injuries have been more clearly reported as the ‘true’ Jones fractures have been better differentiated from the rest as far as treatment and outcomes are concerned.
The intra-osseous blood supply to the fifth metatarsals’ greater tuberosity and proximal diaphysis differs. Fractures of the greater tuberosity both at a proximal and distal level have the propensity to heal given the numerous randomly distributed metaphyseal arteries. In contrast, fractures at the proximal metaphysis disrupt the nutrient artery, and hence create the so-called ‘avascular region’ (10). Considerations of fracture location and potential vascular compromise should therefore always be taken into account and considered in the treatment strategy.
The classification systems have evolved since the first described ‘Jones’ fractures in 1902 but despite this their remains a discrepancy in what is defined as a Jones fracture with some authors defining it as a fracture at the metaphyseal–diaphyseal junction and others at the proximal diaphysis. Therefore, we propose using a combination of Lawrence and Botte’s classification (14) in conjunction with Torg’s classification (35) to avoid any discrepancies when describing these fractures.
Conservative vs surgical treatment is decided based on the fracture type, associated injuries, and individual patient characteristics. Controversies remain regarding surgical treatment options for fifth metatarsal fractures intramedullary screw fixation with or without bone grafting, tension band constructs (60), and low-profile plates (61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67) being the most popular, especially in the general population. Nevertheless, depending on the zone of fracture, several of these may be treated non-operatively; however operative fixation (6, 13, 36) with intramedullary screw and possible biologic augmentation especially for the elite athletes with Zone 2 and 3 injuries remains the standard of care. In contrast, patients who are deemed ‘high risk’ for surgery with a predisposition to complications, for example vasculopaths or patients with diabetic neuropathy, should be treated non-operatively. Plantar plating may also provide an alternative option for treatment with some promising results to date (63, 64, 67). However, further high-quality studies are required to assess its efficacy and long-term complications (111).
The future for managing fifth metatarsal fractures leaves open several areas of research. First, cadaveric studies should be conducted assessing differences in medullary cavity geometry. Discrepancies affecting surgical management have been identified in other fields such as hip arthroplasty (118). Novel surgical techniques have also been proposed through fixation with an intramedullary screw combined with a high-resistance suture (Fibrewire suture no. 2 cerclage). This proof-of-concept cadaveric study provides an interesting option; however, it is awaiting biomechanical evaluation and comparison in trials to other accepted surgical options (119).
In this review, we have provided a framework of thought; however, the optimal strategy should be individualized to accommodate for both fracture and patient factors. Input from the multidisciplinary team should be sought, and the patient should be thoroughly educated and be actively involved in the decision process.
P V G declares having received grants from ZimmerBiomed, GrerenBone, and Hereaus. All remaining authors have received no grants and all authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the work reported here.
This work did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.