Authors: Alessandro Ghiani, Konstantinos Tsitouras, Azal Lutfi, Michaela Barnikel, Axel Tobias Kempa, Nikolaus Kneidinger
Categories: Research, Mechanical ventilation, Tracheostomy timing, Prolonged weaning, Spontaneous breathing trial
Source: BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Authors: Alessandro Ghiani, Konstantinos Tsitouras, Azal Lutfi, Michaela Barnikel, Axel Tobias Kempa, Nikolaus Kneidinger
Controversy exists on the optimal timing for performing a tracheostomy in critically ill patients, particularly in terms of clinical outcomes such as weaning failures, mechanical ventilation duration, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and mortality. The present study aimed to determine whether prolonged mechanically ventilated patients had a higher success rate in ventilator weaning after an “early” tracheostomy”, defined as ≤ 14 days following endotracheal intubation.
An observational, retrospective single-center study of 738 prolonged ventilated, tracheotomized patients treated at a national weaning center over 12 years. Propensity score matching and binary logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate whether an early tracheostomy independently predicted prolonged weaning failures, defined as the transition to home mechanical ventilation.
The entire cohort comprised 507 early procedures (69%), and propensity score matching yielded 220 patients in each group undergoing either an early or a late tracheostomy. Prolonged weaning failure rates (34% vs. 33%, P = 0.762) and other secondary outcomes – decannulation failures, frequencies of long-term oxygen therapy at hospital discharge, mortality rates – were not different between these groups, and an early tracheostomy was not independently associated with failure to wean in logistic regression analysis. However, the groups differed significantly in the total duration of mechanical ventilation (40 days [IQR 32–56] vs. 51 days [52–70], P < 0.01), primarily due to the additional days spent on ventilators before admission to the weaning center in cases of late tracheostomy.
No significant difference in weaning failure rates or other secondary outcomes was observed among prolonged mechanically ventilated, tracheotomized patients treated at a specialized facility, regardless of early (≤ 14 days) or late tracheostomy.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-026-04252-9.
The tracheostomy procedure is commonly performed on patients in the intensive care unit suffering from prolonged mechanical ventilation, loss of airway-protecting reflexes (e.g., in neurological diseases), or obstruction of the upper airways [1]. The use of a tracheostomy is reputed to offer several advantages over endotracheal tubes, relating to a reduction in sedative requirements, such as improved communication and swallowing, lower risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia, a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, and decreased mortality rates, with clinical trial data, however, providing inconsistent evidence to support each of the outlined assertions [2]. Moreover, it is essential to weigh these benefits against the potential adverse effects of the procedure, such as major bleeding, wound infection (surgical tracheostomy dominates), or tracheal stenosis [3]. Most research on tracheostomy in intensive care focuses on the optimal technique (dilatational versus surgical) [4] and the ideal timing of the procedure [3]. Theoretically, “early tracheostomies” could benefit patient outcomes (e.g., weaning outcomes, total ventilation duration, mortality rates), given their potential advantages over endotracheal tubes. However, studies have reported conflicting results on whether early tracheostomies are more beneficial than those performed later, likely due to patient heterogeneity and the wide range of definitions of an “early tracheostomy” [5–9].
To the best of our knowledge, no research has been conducted to date that exclusively evaluates tracheotomized subjects treated in a specialized weaning facility, focusing on specific outcomes such as prolonged weaning failures, transfer rates to home mechanical ventilation, decannulation failures, or frequencies of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) at hospital discharge. Our study hypothesized that prolonged mechanically ventilated patients treated at a national weaning center were more likely to be successfully weaned off the ventilator after an early tracheostomy, defined as ≤ 14 days following endotracheal intubation.
This retrospective study evaluated prolonged mechanically ventilated, tracheotomized patients consecutively admitted at a specialized national weaning facility. Institutional review board approval was obtained for this project (Ethics Committee of the State Chamber of Physicians of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, file number F-2025–050), allowing written informed consent to be waived.
Subjects included in the study had been referred from ICUs across Germany for prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation, meeting both the ICC (International Consensus Conference) and WIND criteria, which relate to failure of at least three weaning attempts or requirement of more than seven days of mechanical ventilation after the first separation attempt [10, 11] (Fig. 1). Additional preconditions for admittance were mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy tube with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) less than 10 cmH2O and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) less than 0.6, hemodynamic stability without the need for vasopressors or inotropes, and the absence of deep sedation. No restrictions were imposed on transferring patients to the weaning center based on the primary reason for mechanical ventilation or concomitant chronic disorders.
Fig. 1Patient flow diagram. *: Refers to the ICC or WIND criteria for prolonged weaning [10, 11]. Abbreviations: SBT, spontaneous breathing trial; ECLS, extracorporeal lung support; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index
Patient records were assessed for demographics (e.g., age, gender, body mass index), clinical features at the time of admission to the weaning center (e.g., APACHE-II score, type of tracheostomy, the primary reason for mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal lung support during the ICU stay), and comorbidities (including the Charlson index). We summarized weaning outcomes, including prolonged weaning failure rates, weaning duration, total mechanical ventilation duration, ventilator-free days within 90 days of intubation (VFD-90), decannulation failures, LTOT frequency at hospital discharge, and hospital mortality rates. Moreover, we analyzed ventilatory variables and indexes immediately before the first protocolized spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) following admission to the center [12, 13] to evaluate gas exchange, lung dimensions, respiratory mechanics, and ventilatory efficiency in each case.
Although tracheostomy is a frequently performed procedure on mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU, the optimal timing for tracheostomy placement remains a topic of debate and ongoing investigation. Considering most studies focus on the period between 10 and 14 days after endotracheal intubation [8, 9], we defined early and late tracheostomies based on the 14-day threshold, using the 10-day threshold for sensitivity analysis.
The outcome of prolonged weaning at the end of the ventilator liberation process was categorized as either failure or success, based solely on patients’ spontaneous breathing abilities [14]. Prolonged weaning failure is defined as “long-term ventilator dependence” due to persistent ventilatory failure with transitioning to domiciliary non-invasive (NIV, by face mask) or invasive ventilation (IMV, by tracheostomy tube). Ventilatory failure describes recurrent hypercapnia [PaCO2 > 45 mmHg] during daily weaning trials, preventing the extension of spontaneous unassisted breathing or hypercapnia occurring within seven days after weaning completion, determined by the last day on which the patient was ventilated. These patients usually remain ventilator-attached at discharge. Conversely, the definition of prolonged weaning success is sustained “autonomic breathing” (≥ 7 days) without concomitant signs of ventilatory failure (hypercapnia) after weaning completion. These patients remain ventilator-detached at hospital discharge [14].
After admission to the weaning center, pressure-controlled, assist-control (A/C) mechanical ventilation was used on all subjects to unload the respiratory pump effectively. A standardized ventilator liberation method, starting with a standardized first 30-minute SBT, was applied once weaning readiness criteria were met, including FiO2 ≤ 0.4, PEEP ≤ 8 cmH2O, stable hemodynamics without vasopressors or inotropic agents, and normocapnia on mechanical ventilation [12, 13]. Along with recording ventilatory variables, arterial blood gases (ABGs) were collected during A/C ventilation in the semi-recumbent position immediately before the onset of the weaning trial, which used a T-piece (with oxygen admixture at the same level as during mechanical ventilation) or CPAP (adjusted to PEEP levels). Each weaning trial ended with another ABG.
We collected the following ventilatory variables immediately before the onset of the first SBT: FiO2, respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (VT), peak inspiratory airway pressure (Pmax), PEEP, and dynamic driving pressure (∆Paw = Pmax–PEEP). Next, we calculated the following parameters to evaluate gas exchange variables, lung dimensions, respiratory mechanics, and ventilatory efficiency within each P/F ratio, predicted body weight normalized tidal volume (VT/PBW; representing lung dimension in the specific setting of prolonged weaning) [14], ventilatory ratio (VR; a composite measure of ventilation efficiency and shunt, correlating with the pulmonary dead-space fraction) [15], dynamic respiratory system compliance (Cdyn = VT/∆Paw; reflecting respiratory mechanics) [13], and mechanical power (MP), with the latter further normalized to Cdyn (referred to as power density) [13, 14] (Additional file 1).
We hypothesized that early tracheostomy (≤ 14 days following endotracheal intubation) would benefit weaning outcomes in patients on prolonged ventilation. Therefore, the primary objective was to compare prolonged weaning outcomes (failure versus success as defined above) between patients with early and late tracheostomy. Secondary outcomes included weaning duration from the first SBT upon admission to the weaning center, total mechanical ventilation duration, VFD-90, decannulation failures, LTOT frequency at hospital discharge, and mortality rates. Moreover, we compared ventilatory indexes reflecting gas exchange, lung dimensions, respiratory mechanics, and ventilatory efficiency among these groups at the time of the first SBT following admission to the center.
Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Depending on the continuous variables` homogeneity of variance, determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, differences between groups were analyzed through Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test.
Propensity score-matched cohorts were used to directly compare outcomes between patients with early (≤ 14 days) versus late tracheostomies. Each patient’s propensity score was calculated employing a logistic regression model, derived from observed demographics, baseline characteristics, and comorbidities, to estimate the predicted probability of an early tracheostomy after intubation (Additional file 1). Subjects were matched 1 without replacement using the nearest-neighbor method, with a caliper of 0.1 SD of the propensity score logit. We performed additional binary logistic regression analysis on the entire study population to determine if tracheostomy timing was independently associated with prolonged weaning failure, introducing this parameter either as a categorical variable (≤ 14 / >14 days following intubation) or as a continuous variable (the number of days between intubation and tracheostomy) into different models. The multivariable analysis employed forward selection of covariates for propensity score matching, as well as baseline parameters with P values < 0.2 in the bivariate analysis. Hosmer-Lemeshow and Nagelkerke R^2^ were used to evaluate the model’s goodness-of-fit. Probabilities are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). We plotted Kaplan-Meier curves for the probability of prolonged weaning failure in the early and late tracheostomy groups and compared them using the log-rank test. Finally, we conducted sensitivity analyses by redefining early tracheostomy as occurring within 10 days of endotracheal intubation.
We performed two-tailed tests; statistical significance was indicated by P < 0.05. The analyses were conducted using MedCalc software version 23.2.7 (Ostend, Belgium).
The study included 738 out of 950 (78%) screened patients between December 2011 and January 2024 (Fig. 1). This unmatched cohort comprised 507 patients (69%) who underwent early tracheostomy (≤ 14 days). A summary of the baseline characteristics of the entire study population is presented in Table S1 (see Additional file 1). Propensity score matching resulted in 220 patients per early (≤ 14 days) versus late tracheostomy (Table 1). The baseline characteristics of these patients were well balanced between groups (Additional file 1); however, the number of days spent on ventilators at weaning center admission was significantly higher in patients with late tracheostomy.
Table 1Clinical characteristics on admission to the weaning center – Comparison of propensity score-matched cohorts with early (≤ 14 days) and late tracheostomy (> 14 days)Clinical characteristicsAll patients(n = 440)Early tracheostomy(n = 220)Late tracheostomy(n = 220)P value^a^Age (years)69 (61–76)69 (62–75)69 (60–76)0.717^b^Female gender172 (39)88 (40)84 (38)0.696^c^Predicted body weight (kg)66 (58–73)66 (60–74)66 (58–73)0.984^b^Body mass index (kg/m^2^)26.0 (22.9–30.9)26.3 (23.1–31.1)25.6 (22.5–30.8)0.174^b^ * Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m* ^2^ ) 126 (29)67 (31)59 (27)0.399^c^Smoking history164 (37)81 (37)83 (38)0.844^c^APACHE-II (points)15 (12–19)16 (12–19)15 (13–19)0.736^b^Pre-existing domiciliary NIV22 (5)13 (6)9 (4)0.382^c^Extracorporeal lung support44 (10)22 (10)22 (10)0.999^c^Percutaneous tracheostomy316 (72)156 (71)160 (73)0.672^c^Intubation to tracheostomy (days)15 (9–19)9 (6–12)19 (17–22)–Ventilator days on center admission26 (19–37)20 (14–29)31 (24–42) < 0.01 ^b^ Reason for intubation Pneumonia159 (36)81 (37)78 (36)0.766^c^ * SARS-CoV-2 infection55 (13)28 (13)27 (12)0.856^c^ Surgery128 (29)63 (29)65 (30)0.834^c^ Cardiopulmonary resuscitation43 (10)20 (9)23 (11)0.631^c^ Sepsis (extrapulmonary)35 (8)21 (10)14 (6)0.218^c^ Acute exacerbation of COPD30 (7)17 (8)13 (6)0.450^c^ Acute heart failure11 (3)5 (2)6 (3)0.760^d^ Other34 (8)13 (6)21 (10)0.154^c^Comorbidities Charlson index (points)5 (4–7)5 (4–7)5 (4–7)0.869^b^ Renal insufficiency134 (31)68 (31)66 (30)0.836^c^ * Hemodialysis on admission84 (19)42 (19)42 (19)0.999^c^ Coronary artery disease112 (26)54 (25)58 (26)0.662^c^ Diabetes mellitus107 (24)57 (26)50 (23)0.437^c^ COPD88 (20)43 (20)45 (21)0.812^c^ Chronic heart failure65 (15)31 (14)34 (16)0.687^c^ Malignancy32 (7)14 (6)18 (8)0.463^c^ Hepatopathy22 (5)12 (6)10 (5)0.662^c^ Interstitial lung diseases16 (4)8 (4)8 (4)0.999^c^ Neuromuscular disease13 (3)6 (3)7 (3)0.779^c^Continuous variables are presented as median (– interquartile range [IQR]); categorical variables are presented as numbers (%). Significant values (P < 0.05) are in boldAbbreviations: BMI body mass index, APACHE-II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, NIV non-invasive ventilation, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasea: P value for differences between patients with early (≤ 14 days) and late (> 14 days) tracheostomyb: Mann-Whitney U-testc: Chi-squared testd: Fisher's exact test
There were no differences between groups in terms of prolonged weaning failures and the number of patients experiencing domiciliary NIV or IMV following discharge from the hospital. In addition, no significant differences were found in most secondary outcomes, except for total mechanical ventilation duration and VFD-90 (Table 2).
Table 2Results of prolonged weaning – Comparison of propensity score-matched cohorts with early (≤ 14 days) and late tracheostomy (> 14 days)Primary outcomeAll patients(n = 440)Early tracheostomy(n = 220)Late tracheostomy(n = 220)P value^a^Prolonged weaning failure147 (33)75 (34)72 (33)0.762^c^ * HMV-NIV* 57 (13)32 (15)25 (11)0.321^c^ * HMV-IMV* 90 (21)43 (20)47 (21)0.637^c^Secondary outcomes Weaning duration from first SBT (days)14 (11–21)14 (11–21)14 (11–20)0.853^b^ Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)^§^47 (36–61)40 (32–56)51 (42–70) < 0.01 ^b^ VFD-90 (days)43 (29–54)50 (34–58)39 (20–49) < 0.01 ^b^ Decannulation failure179 (41)85 (39)94 (43)0.383^c^ SB at weaning completion (hours per day)^^: The values of 15 patients who died during weaning were set at 0 hours per day^*^: Excluding 41 patients who died during their hospital stay
PF ratios differed slightly between patients with early (≤ 14 days) and late tracheostomies before their first weaning trial after weaning center admission, with no significant differences in PBW-normalized tidal volumes, dynamic respiratory system compliance, ventilatory ratio, mechanical power, or power density (Cdyn-MP) (Table 3).
Table 3Respiratory system evaluation at first SBT following center admission – Comparison of propensity score-matched cohorts with early (≤ 14 days) and late tracheostomy (> 14 days)Ventilatory variables and indexes(pre-SBT)All patients(n = 440)Early tracheostomy(n = 220)Late tracheostomy(n = 220)P value^a^P/F ratio (mmHg)279 (221–332)272 (211–325)280 (232–343) 0.048 ^b^
* P/F ratio < 250 mmHg*
160 (36)88 (40)72 (33)0.113^c^VT/PBW (mL/kg)8.3 (7.4–9.7)8.4 (7.5–9.5)8.3 (7.4–9.7)0.910^b^Dynamic driving pressure (cmH2O)16 (15–19)16 (15–19)15 (15–18)0.227^b^Ventilatory ratio1.90 (1.59–2.37)1.87 (1.59–2.31)1.93 (1.60–2.42)0.756^b^Cdyn (mL/cmH2O)32 (27–41)32 (27–41)32 (28–40)0.734^b^Mechanical power (Joule/min)20.8 (17.5–21.2)20.8 (17.5–25.3)20.9 (17.7–24.9)0.820^b^Cdyn-MP (cmH2O^2^/min)6600 (5054–8400)6704 (5054–8519)6384 (5070–8320)0.642^b^Arterial blood gas analysis(pre-SBT) PaO2 (mmHg)81 (71–92)81 (72–93)81 (71–89)0.632^b^ PaCO2 (mmHg)35 (31–40)35 (32–40)35 (30–39)0.350^b^ pH7.48 (7.45–7.52)7.48 (7.45–7.52)7.48 (7.45–7.52)0.503^b^Continuous variables are presented as median (– interquartile range [IQR]). Significant values (P < 0.05) are in boldAbbreviations: SBT spontaneous breathing trial, P/F ratio the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen, VT/PBW tidal volume normalized to the predicted body weight, Cdyn dynamic respiratory system compliance, Cdyn-MP mechanical power normalized to dynamic respiratory system compliancea: P value for differences between patients with early (≤ 14 days) and late (> 14 days) tracheostomyb: Mann-Whitney U-testc: Chi-squared test
In univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, after adjusting for baseline clinical characteristics, the main reason for intubation, and comorbidities, there were no significant associations between early tracheostomy (≤ 14 days) and prolonged weaning failure (Additional file Table S2-S3). However, including tracheostomy timing as a continuous variable in uni- and multivariable models indicated an inverse relationship between the interval between intubation and tracheostomy and the inability to wean from prolonged mechanical ventilation (Additional file Table S4-S5).
Based on the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, there were no significant differences in the probability of prolonged weaning failure between patients with early (≤ 14 days) and late tracheostomy (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier curves comparing patients with early and late tracheostomy. Comparison of prolonged weaning outcomes between patients with early (≤ 14 days) and late tracheostomy (N = 738)
The sensitivity analysis based on the 10-day threshold for defining early and late tracheostomy provided similar results in terms of the primary and secondary study outcomes (Additional file Tables S6-S9, Figure S1).
Study results can be summarized as Based on propensity score matching, there was no difference between prolonged ventilated patients with early (≤ 14 days) and late tracheostomy regarding weaning failures and other secondary outcomes, including weaning duration, decannulation failures, frequency of LTOT at hospital discharge, and mortality rates. Similarly, in binary logistic regression analysis, tracheostomy timing – introduced as a categorical variable into the models – was not independently associated with the primary outcome. However, the groups differed significantly in the total duration of mechanical ventilation and VFD-90, primarily due to the additional days spent on ventilators before admission to the weaning center in cases of late tracheostomy.
Based on recent meta-analyses of non-COVID-19 (including 17 randomized clinical trials (RCTs)) and COVID-19 patients (observational studies only), early tracheostomy was associated with shorter mechanical ventilation duration and decreased ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) risk but not with a reduction in mortality [5, 9]. These data contradict other reports involving non-COVID-19 patients (meta-analyses of RCTs only), particularly regarding VAP and mortality rates [6–8]. With early tracheostomy, the only outcome measure consistently improving across trials was total mechanical ventilation duration [5–9], which aligns with our findings. Interestingly, none of these meta-analyses and systematic reviews presented data concerning weaning failure rates. It is essential to note that studies examining the effects of tracheostomy timing on clinical outcomes reveal substantial heterogeneity regarding the definition of early versus late tracheostomy [6, 7] and patient characteristics. As a result of the heterogeneity of patients, it is difficult to formulate definitive recommendations, signifying that specific patient subgroups, such as those suffering from traumatic brain injury [16], may still benefit from early tracheostomy. By contrast, our findings may also point to potential differences in ventilator weaning procedures following tracheostomy placement, which may be equally important as the timing of the procedure. Despite extensive literature on the decision to insert a tracheostomy and the methods for performing a tracheostomy, questions remain about the optimal treatment following the procedure [17], and most studies do not detail the management of these patients [8]. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first analysis to evaluate subjects treated exclusively in a specialized weaning facility. Given this, our results may not apply to tracheotomized patients in medical or surgical intensive care units [17]. In addition, this is the only study to evaluate the transfer rate to home mechanical ventilation and other clinical outcomes, such as decannulation failures or the frequency of long-term oxygen therapy at hospital discharge, in relation to the timing of tracheostomy placement, displaying no apparent differences between early and late tracheostomies.
According to the present results, the increased total mechanical ventilation duration and less VFD-90 were primarily attributed to significantly more days spent on ventilators at the referring ICUs within the late tracheostomy group. One explanation for this finding could be that patients with late tracheostomies may have experienced a more extended period of unreadiness for weaning following intubation [18]. In such cases, most clinicians do not perform tracheostomies on patients with severe conditions associated with deteriorated gas exchange and ventilatory failure necessitating more aggressive mechanical ventilation (e.g., higher FiO2 or PEEP). Upon admission to the weaning center, there was no longer a difference between the groups in weaning duration or other clinical outcomes. Moreover, no clinically relevant differences were found in gas exchange variables or parameters reflecting lung dimensions, respiratory mechanics, and ventilatory efficiency at the first SBT following center admission. Some of these indexes, particularly dynamic respiratory system compliance and power density, have been shown to predict prolonged weaning outcomes reliably [14]. Measuring these parameters provides an indirect indicator of respiratory muscle load during unassisted, spontaneous ventilation, which is crucial for sustained autonomic breathing following prolonged ventilation. In other words, weaning readiness before and weaning trajectories after the first SBT were comparable between the two groups. Contrary to expectations [19], the net reduction in total ventilation duration for early tracheostomy did not benefit primary or secondary outcomes. Instead, logistic regression analysis revealed a significant inverse relationship between the primary outcome and the number of days from intubation to tracheostomy (Additional file Table S4-S5), evidence that may reflect selection bias, as patients with evidently worse prognoses regarding the ability to wean off the ventilator may have been tracheotomized very early in the course of their illness.
In the present study, secondary outcomes did not differ by tracheostomy timing, including failure to decannulate, LTOT frequency at hospital discharge, and mortality rates. A high rate of unsuccessful decannulations was observed, reaching 40%, consistent with previous findings [20, 21]. Common reasons for failure to decannulate include persistent, severe ICU-acquired dysphagia (resulting in excessive salivation and aspiration) and long-term ventilator dependence following prolonged weaning, neither of which was evaluated in the present study.
This study has limitations. First, external validity is questionable due to the study’s monocentric design and the restriction of findings to patients admitted to specialized long-term weaning facilities, which limits generalizability. Second, as this was a retrospective study, despite conducting propensity score matching and logistic regression analyses, we may have overlooked confounding factors that led to imbalances in covariates between groups. Accordingly, the inability to control for factors before transfer to the weaning facility, such as variability in ICU practices (e.g., sedation and mechanical ventilation management) and health care resources, could have biased the results. Third, given the limited information on managing patients in the referring ICU, we could not assess whether tracheostomy timing would affect other important outcomes, such as VAP. Similarly, patient-centered outcomes such as swallowing, speech, or mobility impairments may vary depending on the timing of the tracheostomy. Moreover, mortality rates are likely to be deflated, as only patients who survived their ICU stay were included in the study.
Among a large cohort of prolonged mechanically ventilated, tracheotomized patients treated in a specialized facility, early tracheostomy (≤ 14 days) did not result in higher weaning success rates – defined as transition to long-term home mechanical ventilation – or improvements in other secondary outcomes, but was associated with a shorter total duration of mechanical ventilation and more ventilator-free days at 90 days following intubation. Future research should focus on other patient-centered outcomes (e.g., dysphagia or speech and mobility impairments), which may also depend on the timing of the tracheostomy procedure.
Supplementary Material 1.
Supplementary Material 2.