Authors: Reinaldo S. Theodoro, Gustavo S. M. Santos, Matteo D’Andria, Henrique S. Gropelo, Sebastian Kravecz, Andreas T. Güntner, Diogo P. Volanti
Categories: Review, toxic gases, nanotechnology, electronic materials, semiconductors, metal oxides, devices
Source: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
with Nanoscaled Materials in Chemoresistive Gas Sensors
Authors: Reinaldo S. Theodoro, Gustavo S. M. Santos, Matteo D’Andria, Henrique S. Gropelo, Sebastian Kravecz, Andreas T. Güntner, Diogo P. Volanti
Air pollution is a pressing global concern due to its negative effects on human health and our ecosystem. For instance, pollutants, including particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, nitrogen- and sulfur-based gases, and ozone, are known to increase the incidence rates of respiratory, cardiovascular, and various cancer types, among others. Comprehensive monitoring of key gaseous pollutants is, therefore, critical to enforce adherence to regulatory limits or to control personal exposure. In this review, we analyze the progress on nanostructured and porous chemoresistive gas sensors over the last five years and critically compare their performance to air pollution guidelines. We start with a discussion of the major outdoor and indoor pollutants, describing their main sources and the associated health effects arising from short- and long-term exposures to concentrations exceeding national and regional limits. Thereafter, we describe the working mechanism of chemoresistive gas sensors along with their key performance parameters, followed by a literature survey of several nanoscaled porous materials for such applications. We highlight different engineering strategies focused on structural, morphological, and electronic control through heterostructures, surface functionalization, and metal–organic framework templates that tune air pollutant adsorption, catalytic conversion on their surfaces, and sensor signal generation. Finally, we briefly discuss the integration of these gas-sensing technologies into functional devices to translate material and surface innovation into environmental monitoring platforms for consumer electronics, wearables, and smart-home solutions.
Air pollution is a major social and environmental concern, causing severe impacts on both human health and the environment. Data published by the World Health Organization (WHO) on air quality standards indicate that 99% of the global population is routinely exposed to indoor and outdoor environments with pollution levels exceeding the recommended air quality limits. This is particularly critical in urban settings due to intense transportation and concentrated industrial activities. In 2019, air pollution was associated with approximately 6.7 million premature deaths worldwide, with a higher prevalence in developing countries, particularly in the Southeast Asian and Western Pacific regions.
Groups strongly susceptible to the adverse effects of air pollution include children and the elderly, middle-aged adults, pregnant women, and individuals with pre-existing health conditions, such as asthma, hypertension, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, studies have shown that older women and African Americans living in urban areas of the United States are more vulnerable to respiratory problems associated with air pollution caused by wildfires and the generation of particulate matter (PM). Further studies indicate that socioeconomic factors play a role; thus, low-income populations tend to be at higher risk.
The main air pollutants include CO, O3, NO*
x
, SO
x
*, Pb, Cd, and fine
particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and pathogens
(fungi, bacteria, and viruses). Long-
and short-term exposure to high levels of air pollutants has been
linked to an increased risk of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, headaches, dizziness, irritation of the mucous
membranes, skin, eyes, and allergic reactions. Furthermore, several compounds have toxic effects on the
body, including neurotoxicity, neurodegenerative conditions, and carcinogenicity. Among the carcinogenic compounds are benzene, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, naphthalene,
ethylbenzene, tetrachloroethylene, and styrene that have been associated
with the development of lung, breast, and thyroid cancer as well as
leukemia.
,
Air pollutants are also responsible for
climate change and damage to ecosystems. Acid rain, particulate matter
deposits and other air pollutants interfere
with plant metabolism and physiology, promoting acidification and altered nutrient cycling in soils that results in economic loss.
The development and application of innovative sensor materials and devices for monitoring and mitigating gaseous pollutants are of fundamental importance. However, most available air quality sensors lack the required performance to track critical pollutants. Figure illustrates the key performance and economic metrics that air quality sensors need to meet. Detection challenges (1) achieving a satisfactory lower limit of detection (LLOD) to recognize air pollutants at their typical trace concentrations, (2) selectivity to discriminate between different chemical species, (3) fast and reversible response needed for continuous monitoring, , (4) operational stability and (5) robustness against environmental conditions, including temperature and relative humidity fluctuations. , Furthermore, economic considerations encompass the scalable manufacturing and use of sustainable, low-cost materials with minimal energy consumption.

In solid-state chemoresistive sensors, surface interactions with gaseous molecules cause variations in the electrical conductivity of the material, , enabling the detection of chemical species. In this context, the response to air pollutants depends entirely on the interaction between these molecules and the active surface of the sensor, resulting in signal transduction at the interface. Promising strategies to design high-performance gas sensors rely on the deployment of nanometric porous materials (1–100 nm), −
semiconductor metal oxides, −
nitrides, , sulfides, , bromides, , metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), −
zeolites, , functionalized materials based on carbon nanotubes, graphene, , noble metals, and composites. , The nature of the physical and chemical interactions between the VOCs and the sensor surface affects the detection mechanism. Further, structural factors such as nanoparticle morphology, film architecture, specific surface area, density of active sites, grain size, and porosity influence the electrical gas responses of semiconductors. , Altogether, these highlight the need for a thorough analysis of the intertwined physicochemical and mesoscale features that ultimately govern gas–solid interactions and charge-transport pathways.
Previous reviews have explored the development of chemoresistive gas sensor materials with high porosity, surface area, −
activated adsorption sites, gas diffusion ability, , catalytic properties, and material defectsoxygen and metal vacancies −
very often responsible for improving sensing performance of many material types. These reviews covered diverse synthesis technologies, such as hydrothermal and solvothermal (including microwave-assisted), coprecipitation, chemical reduction, sol–gel, flame spray pyrolysis (FSP), electrospinning, and others to obtain different chemoresistive gas sensor materials. Also, operational concepts (e.g., light activation) and signal processing strategies have been covered. A wide range of applications is targeted, among health/medical, −
space and air quality, with different approaches to environmental monitoring based, for instance, on emerging “Internet of Things” (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) capabilities. −
Yet, none of them has offered a detailed comparison of sensor performance against current exposure guidelines from agencies such as the EPA (U.S.), EEA (Europe), and MEE (China). −
This review provides a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art
chemoresistive sensor technologies developed over the past five years.
We assess recent innovations based on their adherence to national
and regional air quality exposure guidelines to benchmark progress
and identify opportunities for further research and development. We
begin by summarizing the main toxic volatile compounds, their emission
sources, the recommended exposure limits for each analyte, and the
associated health effects of prolonged exposure (Section
). Based on these regulatory
requirements, we identify chemoresistive gas sensors (published within
the last five years) that achieve the required performance metrics
(Section
, Table
). Additionally, we
elaborate on the fundamental sensing mechanisms of chemoresistive
materials, such as metal oxides (MO*
x
*),
transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), transition metal nitrides
(TMNs), transition metal halides (TMHs), MXene composites, metal–organic
frameworks (MOFs) and their derivatives, conductive polymers, and
organic materials, highlighting the key physicochemical properties
and interactions that govern their sensing performance. From this
analysis, we identify strategies to overcome existing limitations
in sensing performance and in the practical implementation of these
materials into functional devices (Sections
). To summarize, Figure
shows a systematic overview of the transition
from nanoparticles and porous materials fabrication to real functional
devices, emphasizing the need for engineering across multiple length
scales to preserve the sensing performance while ensuring reliable
operation in real-time air quality monitoring under real conditions.

Exposure Limits
Air
pollutants are classified as primary and secondary, according to their
origin. Primary pollutants, such as SO2, NO*
x
*, CO, CO2, CH4, NH3, VOCs, and particulate matter, are emitted directly into the atmosphere,
primarily by industrial activities, fossil fuel combustion, mobile
source emissions, agricultural and deforestation activities, as well
as petroleum and mining processes. In
turn, secondary pollutants, such as ozone, nitrites, nitrates, peroxyacetyl
nitrate, sulfates, and aldehydes, result from chemical reactions between
primary pollutants and the atmosphere, intensifying the greenhouse effect and contributing to photochemical
smog.
,
Although there is extensive discussion of environmental pollution guidelines focused on particulate matter and inorganic compounds, little emphasis is given to the importance and impact of VOCs. These encompass a diverse class of hydrocarbon-based organic chemical compounds that have relatively high vapor pressure and low molecular weight, as well as resistance to spontaneous degradation. , Furthermore, VOCs can be classified according to their volatility and intensity of emission into the environment, highly volatile compounds, such as methyl chloride, propane, and butane; volatile compounds, such as alcohols, ketones, formaldehyde, and aromatic organic compounds (benzene, toluene, xylene, etc.); and semivolatile compounds, such as pesticides, organophosphates and PAHs. ,
Naturally occurring VOCs result from atmospheric emissions, forest fires, volcanic and geothermal activity, microbiological processes, dust, and aerosols. On the other hand, the main toxic VOCs are associated with emissions from anthropogenic sources, stationary sources, transport vehicles, and intense human activity, as represented in Figure . Studies indicate that many synthetic materials and human activities increase the release of toxic volatile compounds into indoor environments, resulting in VOC concentrations that are often higher than those observed outdoors. , This difference stems from the diverse sources of VOCs, such as acetone, ethanol, benzene, toluene, xylene, formaldehyde, and ethylbenzene, present in indoor environments, with approximately 52% derived from building materials alone. Furthermore, the use of cleaning, hygiene, and cosmetic chemicals, furniture and decorative materials, paints, heaters, cooking gas, and smoking primarily contribute to this effect. ,
This section reviews the main types of air pollutants, emphasizing their main emission sources, adverse effects on human health and in animal models, as available in the literature, and the exposure limits established by different regulatory bodies. The information presented in Table was compiled from databases provided by internationally recognized institutions such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and the American Lung Association (ALA). Furthermore, comparisons were made with the European Environment Agency (EEA), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of German Social Accident Insurance (IFA), Chinese Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE), and Chinese National Health Commission (NHC), as specified by the respective citations.
Methanol and ethanol are primarily present in distillation factories, motor fuels, pharmaceuticals, and pigments production. They are considered moderately toxic yet teratogenic compounds. Exposure can cause headaches, dizziness, and allergic reactions. Methanol is a widely used chemical feedstock in laboratories and chemical plants, posing a potential hazard for intoxication. Its ingestion, inhalation, or skin absorption leads to irreversible tissue damage to the eyes and nervous system, or even death. Especially in developing countries, methanol poisoning outbreaks occur frequently due to adulterated alcohol, such as in India with >90 deaths in February 2019. In 2025, a serious incident of methanol poisoning occurred in Brazil linked to the commercialization of adulterated alcoholic beverages. The outbreak resulted in severe symptoms in 209 suspected cases and 15 confirmed deaths as of the time of this discussion. Such events highlight the ongoing risks associated with illicit alcohol production and underscore the need for stricter regulatory monitoring and public awareness to prevent future occurrences.
Acetone is widely used as a solvent in various applications including chemical cleaning products, hygiene products, and paints. Long-term exposure can irritate mucous membranes and damage the respiratory and nervous systems. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommends a long-term (10 h) exposure of 250 ppm–594.0 mg/m^3^.
Formaldehyde (CH2O) is a colorless and flammable gas produced by the oxidation
of methanol or methane in the presence of a catalyst. Formaldehyde is a major indoor pollutant in
various industries, including the production of cosmetics, paints,
formaldehyde-based wooden products, and during the combustion of biofuels.
−
However, formaldehyde is also a concern in outdoor environments
due to the increase in forest fires and the large-scale consumption
of biofuels in recent years. Exposure to formaldehyde can lead to
various health issues in humans. Formaldehyde acute effects mainly
occur by inhalation and can cause coughing, chest pain, irritation
in different parts of the body, and wheezing. Other chronic disorders,
such as respiratory infections, dermatitis, and skin irritations,
can be observed after long-term exposure to formaldehyde. Acetaldehyde (CH3CHO) is a colorless
gas, flammable, and exhibits a fruity odor at lower concentrations. The main sources of acetaldehyde are summarized
in the production of resins, perfumes, and are used as a solvent in
the rubber and paper industries. Acetaldehyde
also plays an important role in the metabolism of plants and animals. Irritation of the eyes, skin, and respiratory
tract is one of the acute effects caused by. Acetaldehyde is classified
as a possible human carcinogen (Group B2) by the EPA.
Aromatic compounds, such as benzene, toluene, and xylene, exhibit a high degree of toxicity and carcinogenicity upon exposure. Benzene, for instance, is primarily released during gasoline handling at gas stations and is also found in building materials, tobacco smoke, and furniture. , Loss of consciousness, headache, confusion, and drowsiness are some of the acute effects caused by exposure to benzene. Benzene is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen in humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) during chronic exposure. Other chronic effects may be observed in humans, such as lung cancer and leukemia. Toluene and xylenes are primarily found in the automotive industry, cigarette smoke, gas stations, refineries, and as solvents in adhesives and cleaning agents. , These aromatic compounds also present high toxicity and carcinogenic levels. For instance, exposure to toluene may affect the central nervous system, causing headaches, fatigue, drowsiness, and cardiac arrhythmia. Upon exposure to xylene, similar effects can be observed in humans, including neurological issues, impacts on lung function, gastrointestinal function, and dyspnea.
Hydrogen sulfide
(H2S) is a flammable and colorless gas characterized by
the distinctive odor of rotten eggs. H2S is a gas of considerable
environmental and occupational concern. It is generated primarily
during processes such as oil and natural gas refining, the decomposition
of human and animal waste, the treatment of industrial effluents,
and the manufacturing of fertilizers and various chemicals.
,
In addition, large amounts of H2S are naturally released
in landfills as a byproduct of the anaerobic breakdown of organic
matter. Due to its physicochemical properties,
H2S is highly toxic and can be absorbed rapidly through
the lungs upon inhalation. Acute exposure may result in severe irritation
of the respiratory tract, often accompanied by neurological symptoms
such as seizures, headaches, dizziness, and even apnea. At higher
concentrations, the gas can impair cellular respiration by inhibiting
cytochrome oxidase, leading to systemic toxicity and, in extreme cases,
fatal outcomes. Exposure to H2S is a significant concern in public health, particularly due to
the large number of industrial facilities that release this pollutant
gas.
This class includes chloroform and carbon tetrachloride. Chloroform is derived from sources such as hydrochlorofluorocarbons, solvent use, water chlorination processes, pulp and paper mills, and landfills. Carbon tetrachloride is used in the manufacture of refrigerants, aerosols, solvents, rubbers, and paints. Among the acute effects, depression of the central nervous system, liver, and kidneys stands out, but exposure can also cause pulmonary edema.
x
, COx, NH3, SO
x
*, and O3
These pollutants comprise a group of gases released
into the atmosphere on a large scale, primarily through human activities
that intensify the greenhouse effect and contribute to the formation
of photochemical smog. CO2 and carbon monoxide CO are primarily
produced by the burning of fuels and wood, which is directly related
to financial interests at the expense of sustainability. Other gases,
such as NO*
x
Detection
Chemiresistive gas sensors are based on various
classes of materials
(Figure
) and can
be broadly divided into two inorganic and carbon-based materials.
The inorganic materials include semiconducting metal oxides (SMO*
x
*),
,
transition metal dichalcogenides
(TMDs),
,
transition metal nitrides (TMNs), transition metal halides (TMHs, e.g., bromide
compounds), and MXene-based materials (Figure
, orange-shaded). On the other hand, the carbon-based materials
comprise porous materials such as metal–organic frameworks
(MOFs) and covalent–organic frameworks (COFs),
−
graphene and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), conducting polymers, and other organic sensing materials , (green-shaded). These materials can be combined to yield new material compositions and interfaces capable of tuning sensitivity, selectivity, stability, response and recovery times, and lower limit of detection (LLOD).

Over the past five years, the literature has explored
various strategies
to modify materials based on advances in engineering of fabrication
processes followed by their assembly into sensing devices (Figure
). These approaches
aim to create novel materials with complex structural and electronic
composition. For instance, metal oxides and their heterostructures
can be manufactured with different approaches, surface-decorated with
active single metal atoms or clusters of varying size and even Janus-like these topics will be detailed in Sections
–3.1.3. Some crystal configurations of chemiresistive
materials, such as MXenes, perovskites, and spinel structures that
define both the electronic and chemical surface properties, will be
elaborated in Sections
and 3.3. Other materials such as
zeolites, MOFs/COFs (conducting polymers and organic materials), and
organic functionalizations (MO*
x
*/graphene
and/or reduced graphene) are inherently microporous, a key consideration
for molecular diffusion and active-site accessibility, as will be
discussed in Sections
–3.6. Collectively, these
design features are engineered to fine-tune the material’s
structural and electronic properties, including porosity, surface
area, pore architecture, gas adsorption behavior, and defect types
(oxygen and/or metal vacancies), resulting in enhanced detection performance
as schematically illustrated in Figure
.
This review analyzes the progress in the field
of chemoresistive
gas sensor material design in close comparison to the established
exposure limits (Table
). We elaborate on the merits of synthesis and characterization techniques
along with diverse surface and morphology engineering strategies,
which have greatly enhanced sensor development and performance. Table
identifies chemoresistive materials that have already met
(or are promising to meet) air pollutants’ exposure guideline
values under laboratory or even real-world conditions. In Table
, we meticulously
identify material composition, morphology, synthesis method, sensor
response, target gas concentration (ppm), operating temperature (°C),
and relative humidity (RH) conditions, selectivity, and lower limit
of detection, as well as response (t
resp) and recovery (t
rec) times.
x
*) Sensors and Strategies to Improve Toxic Volatile Detection
As can be noted in Table
, either pristine or heterostructured/doped semiconductor
MO*
x
’s are widely deployed across
most of the air pollutants, with the notable exception of CO2, where MO
x
’s are either interfaced
with other materials classes (e.g., MOFs, MXenes, CNTs), or very different
sensor concepts (e.g., optical) are
preferred. Next, we examine the theory behind chemoresistivity, with
particular emphasis on the most studied MO
x
*, which should share similarities in principle with other semiconductor
materials relevant to quality monitoring. After discussing some fundamentals,
we explain redox chemistry in microscopic relation
to electronic band structure and space-charge effects, followed by
a critical review of the mechanisms triggering such electrical responses,
in light of recent operando spectroscopic investigations.
x
In ideal, defect-free, and perfectly stoichiometric
oxide crystals, the Fermi level (E
F) lies
approximately at midgap between the valence band maximum (VBM) and
conduction band minimum (CBM), deviating only slightlytypically
by a few tens of meV, toward one band edge, depending on the relative
effective masses of holes and electrons in the VB and CB, respectively.
Owing to the absence of native donors (e.g., oxygen vacancies in n-type
MO*
x
) or acceptors
(e.g., cation vacancy in p-type MO
x
*), such a purely intrinsic semiconductor would exhibit negligible free-carrier density and therefore function
neither as an effective chemoresistor, nor as a suitable material
for other surface-redox processes, such as heterogeneous catalysis or electrochemical energy conversion. In fact, for these applications, native defects
are essential, as they (i) provide the donor–acceptor imbalance
necessary for carrier modulation via n- or p-doping, and (ii) introduce intrinsic nonstoichiometry
at the reactive surface, which typically fosters the adsorption, activation,
and conversion of air pollutant molecules, i.e., the receptor function.
Beyond native oxygen vacancies (n-doping) or interstitials (p-doping),
doping small quantities of aliovalent metals into the MO*
x
For both n- and
p-type MO*
x
*, resistance
changes are governed by redox-related electrostatic surface fields that shift E
F relative to vacuum
(E
vacuum), i.e., work function (Φ
= E
vacuum – E
F), thereby inducing a rigid
shift of all semiconductor energy levels below E
F, that is, those with positive binding energy. As shown in Figure
a,b, at the
surface, this can either bring these states farther from
or closer to E
F, depending on whether
Φ decreases (“reducing agents”, surface donors,
downward band bending) or increases (“oxidizing agents”,
surface acceptors, upward band bending), respectively. The spatial
extent (z
0) to which such energy-band
bendings extend into the material depends on the details of the space-charge
layer and further assumptions (e.g., the Schottky approximation used
in the “immobile ions” case). Therein, the Debye length
(λ
D) is a widely used order-of-magnitude
estimate of the electrostatic screening length scale.

Under the hypothesis that the sensing reaction
proceeds without
formation or consumption of any dipole-like adsorbates, the electron
affinity (χ) remains constant, and the magnitude of E
F-/Φ-shift exactly equals that of the
upward or downward band bending potential. Such an assumption, i.e., Δχ = 0, can
certainly be debatable even in dry conditions, especially given that
many typical reaction intermediates, such as carbonates from CO or
hydrocarbons, and nitrates derived from NO*
x
, may be dipolar (i.e., not ionized donors or acceptors) and remain
adsorbed on the surface during sensing. Nevertheless, this simplification has proved particularly useful
for elucidating the transducer function of semiconducting MO
x
, for instance, in rationalizing the generally
higher sensitivity of n-type compared to p-type materials. Given the above microscopic analogies between n- and p-MO
x
As illustrated in Figure
a,b, such changes in charge-carrier concentrations
occur at
the surface (z = 0) as the result of E
F-shifts relative to the relevant band edge, that is,
the CB and VB edges for n- and p-type materials, respectively. In
fact, for n-type MO*
x
,
upward (CB-)bending locally increases the separation
between E
F and the CB edge, reducing CB-electron
concentration in the space-charge layer (electron depletion layer,
EDL, higher resistance). For p-type MO
x
*, instead, upward (VB-)bending locally decreases the separation between E
F and the VB
edge, increasing VB-hole concentration (hole accumulation layer, HAL,
lower resistance). Opposite-wise occurs with downward bending, providing
a microscopic explanation of phenomenological electrophysical measurements,
substantiated by simple charge-carrier equilibrium populations in
the hypothesis that Boltzmann statistics are valid (see charge-carrier
statistics in Figure
a,b). This assumption typically works in conditions far from the
degenerate limit, which can be approached, for instance, by using
SnO2-based materials to detect relatively high concentrations
of H2 and/or CO in low-oxygen backgrounds.
Advancing materials research for high-performing air-quality monitors requires bridging phenomenological sensor outputs with an atomistic-level view of the events occurring on the surface. Such insights are usually obtained from in situ X-ray absorption and photoemission spectroscopies, which are now increasingly performed also under operando conditions. −
Traditionally, in the so-called “ionosorption model”, chemoresponse generation in both n- and p-type
MO*
x
Consequently,
recent studies have proposed alternative explanations
for conductivity modulation that rely on intrinsic oxygen species - namely, lattice oxygen ions (O^2–^) of the solid itself. Such participation of intrinsic oxygen is on par with the broader heterogeneous catalysis literature,
which highlights the mobility and reactivity of lattice O^2–^, together with the critical role of
oxygen vacancies (VO) in Mars-van Krevelen-type catalytic
oxidations occurring on reducible oxides, like many common sensing
materials (e.g., SnO2, WO3, Co3O4, etc.). Initially developed for n-type MO*
x
Therein, modulation of surface-VO population shifts E
F analogously
to the extrinsic “Oβ
^α–^ model”,
that is, VO-consumption and formation leads to upward and
downward band bending, respectively, as experimentally supported by operando X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies
on (n-type) SnO2, as well
as in-plane Fermi surface mapping from angle-resolved photoemission
spectroscopy (ARPES) on high-quality In2O3 single
crystals. The viability of such a novel
“VO model” for p-type materials has likewise
been proposed, with the main distinction
being that surface-VO-related electron states are “deep”
in the bandgap (i.e., close to VBM, owing to the strong O(2p)–metal(d)
character of upper-VB states). Electrons in these deep VO can recombine with VB holes, again leading to analogous E
F-shifts upon exposure to oxidizing and reducing
molecules.
The working principles of “Oβ
^α–^ model” and “VO model” are illustrated
in the example of an n-type MO*
x
Building on this theoretical framework, we now turn to the question
that has guided much of the recent how can one enhance
the sensitivity and selectivity of chemoresistive sensors? Almost
by “default”, there are two widely adopted
(1) the formation of heterojunctions and (2) the surface decoration
of pristine MO*
x
x
As a thermodynamic requirement,
when two semiconductors are brought into contact, any initial mismatch
in their E
F drives electron redistribution
across the interface until E
F becomes
uniform throughout the entire solid. With a common E
vacuum reference, electrons
flow from the semiconductor with a lower Φ (i.e., higher E
F) to the one with a higher Φ (lower E
F). Since the energy of all electronic states
on both sides remains referenced to its initial alignment with E
vacuum (i.e., assuming no change in χ)
this leads to upward band bending on the side with lower initial Φ,
and downward band bending on the side with higher initial Φ.
The result is the formation of two space-charge regions at the interface,
each characterized by its own width and band bending magnitude. This
so-called initial band bending arises purely from
contact-induced charge transfer, without involvement of any surface
chemistry or gaseous species.
The implications for sensing are
profound: (i) the built-in junction potential largely governs the
resistance of heterostructured semiconductors, providing a powerful means to modulate conductivity responses
to air pollutants; and (ii) semiquantitative semiconductor calculations
suggest that, in the presence of such initial band
bending, a given modification of surface charge (Q
S) produces a more pronounced change in electrical resistance.
Figure
a,b schematically illustrate the formation of a CuO-SnO2 p–n junction, which, owing to the lower initial Φ
of SnO2 relative to CuO, manifests as an electron-depletion
layer on the SnO2 side and a hole-depletion layer on the
CuO side. The report by Wang et al. underscores
these CuO-SnO2 heterostructures as highly effective CO
sensors operating under mildly humid air (25% RH) and at room temperature,
though exhibiting a pronounced response deterioration at higher humidity
levels (up to 85% RH).

Figure
d shows
the morphology of a Fe2O3/Ti3C2 composite, where MXene stacked nanosheets are decorated with
active Fe2O3 nanoparticles forming a uniform
Fe2O3/Ti3C2 heterointerface.
In transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the Ti3C2 surface exhibited numerous smaller, darker regions, suggesting
the formation of the Fe2O3/Ti3C2 composite, as confirmed by elemental mapping via energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, which revealed a homogeneous
distribution of C, O, F, and Fe. Figure
e shows the transient response of the Fe2O3/Ti3C2 sensor when exposed
to different H2S concentrations ranging between 0.01–500
ppm. As observed, the sensor exhibits an LLOD below 0.01 ppm, which
is 500 times lower than the maximum permissible exposure limit of
5 ppm for H2S. Furthermore, the MXene-based composite demonstrates
remarkable selectivity toward H2S even in the presence
of high concentrations of interfering gases (Figure
f), endowing the Fe2O3/Ti3C2 heterojunction with great potential
for monitoring indoor and outdoor air quality.
Figure
g shows
the morphological characteristics of yet another heterojunction, MXene/V2O5/Ag (MVA-4), analyzed by SEM, TEM, and high-resolution
TEM (HR-TEM). As observed, the MXene in the MVA-4 composite exhibits
an open, accordion-like lamellar structure with nanosheet delamination.
Vanadium oxide (V2O5) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles
are uniformly dispersed within the interlayers and on the surface
of the MXene nanosheets, showing a high dispersion and minimal agglomeration.
TEM analysis shows that the surface of MXene in MVA-4 is completely
covered by irregular polygonal Ag nanoparticles (highlighted in blue)
and elliptical V2O5 nanoparticles (highlighted
in red), both uniformly distributed across the material’s surface.
The HR-TEM features distinct lattice spacings corresponding to (101),
(−111), and (111) planes of the crystallographic MXene, V2O5, and Ag structures, respectively, in agreement
with XRD analysis. The MXene/V2O5/Ag heterostructure
exhibits a high response of ∼20 to 10 ppm NH3 at
room temperature, with a rapid response time of 8 s and LLOD below
0.5 ppm, ∼50 times lower than exposure regulationsalong
with outstanding selectivity against critical gases (Figure
h,i). We conclude that MXene-based
materials, when combined with other material classes via heterointerface formation (Section
) and/or surface functionalization (Section
), hold
great potential for the development of advanced gas sensors capable
of efficiently detecting air pollutants.
Sensors
Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are materials with remarkable potential for gas sensing due to their physicochemical properties, including high porosity, a large specific surface area, 3D-ordered structures, and well-established morphology control, which facilitates the adsorption of gaseous molecules. −
Pristine MOFs are used as precursors for the synthesis of tunable gas sensors. Still, they can also be directly combined to produce functionalized composite sensors , that enhance sensing performance due to the catalytic/filtering effects resulting from MOF incorporation.
The architecture control enabled by
MOF-templating is a key factor in developing porous structures with
a high surface area, which is crucial for gas-sensing applications.
In these applications, the synthesis conditionse.g., pH, temperature,
and solventare critical in determining the morphology. Several MOFs have already been applied in the
form of chemoresistive materials’ templating. MOF-5 is a well-known
porous cubic precursor for ZnO fabrication, consisting of terephthalic
acid as an organic linker and Zn4O clusters.
,−
In contrast, zeolitic-imidazolate frameworks
(ZIFs) represent a subclass of MOFs that contain the imidazolate linkers
forming metal-linker-metal structures with characteristic T
~
d
~ metal sites (e.g., Co, Zn,
Cd, Cu, Fe).
,
ZIF-67 and ZIF-8 are some examples
of Co- and Zn-based MOFs that can be thermally decomposed to obtain
Co3O4 and ZnO structures, respectively.
Over the past five years, the use of MOF-derived and functionalized
MOF-based sensors has increased significantly. Zhen et al. synthesized a Sn-based MOF decorated on TiO2 nanotube arrays (NTA), followed by calcination to form an
active SnO2/SnMOF interface for formaldehyde detection.
The authors reported that the SnMOF/SnO2@TiO2 (annealed at 200 °C) exhibited a high formaldehyde response
at room temperature, with fast response/recovery times of 4 and 2.5
s, respectively, albeit to a very high concentration of 6000 ppb.
They experimentally quantified down to 750 ppb, which is still ∼10
and ∼100 times higher than, for instance, the WHO guideline
(Table
) and the French
recommendation. The performance shown
in Figure
a,b was
attributed to the mild sintering of SnO2 nanocrystals upon
partial decomposition of the organic linkers, which improved electron
transport while retaining the intended SnMOF structure, as confirmed
by the homogeneous elemental EDX-map in Figure
c.

Park et al. developed
MOF-on-cMOF
(conductive MOF) thin films using different MOFs and thicknesses controlled
by the shearing speed, achieving a wide range of pore architectures
that immediately resulted in tunable sensing performance. For instance,
they could modify the MOF-on-cMOF response patterns toward NH3, H2S, and NO2 by varying the double-layer
preparation using ZIF-8, MIL-53(Al)-TDC, MIL-53(Fe), and MFM-300(Al).
Most importantly, the previous approach is very flexible in that the
cMOFs’ properties can be modified by choosing MOFs with ad hoc pore architecture, gas affinity, metal center, etc,
as early demonstrated in Figure
d,e and conceptually illustrated in Figure
f as a general concept toward
more efficient MOF-on-cMOF air pollutant monitors.
As an example
for MOF-templating, Zhao et al. fabricated
a bimetallic organic framework-derived (In/Fe
Bi-MOF) In2O3@Fe2O3 core@shell
nanotubes for CO detection. As shown in Figure
g,h, the sensor exhibited enhanced performance
compared to pure In2O3, with an approximate
4-fold increase in response to 200 ppm of CO at 260 °C. Beyond
the heterojunction effect (M1O*
x
/M2O
y
Carbon-based
materials, mainly in the form of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) interfaced
with MO*
x

Engineering carbon-based loading is an effective
strategy to tune
the directionality of electron flow in C/MO*
x
The DFT
analysis (Figure
f,g) revealed that HGO loading optimizes the NO2 adsorption
energetics (E
ads = −0.504
eV vs −0.459 eV for GO), favoring stronger substrate–adsorbate
charge transfer and tighter N-C bonding, as evident from the electron
localization function (ELF) contours. Although rarely employed in
the sensing literature, bond-contact analysisparticularly
the integration of the crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP)
up to E
F, yielding the integrated COHP
(ICOHP)is a valuable
computational descriptor of total bond strength that enables the investigation
of bond activation and formation mechanisms. Aleksanyan et al. fabricated a MWCNTs-functionalized
ZnO that was additionally decorated with Pd catalytic nanoparticles
for CO2 detection. The sensor was moderately robust to
higher-concentration interferents (Figure
h) and displayed the air-quality-relevant
CO2 dynamic range (Figure
i), which was attributed to the cofunctionalization
with Pd and MWCNTs that were uniformly distributed on the nanostructured
support (Figure
j).
Conducting polymer and organic materials have gained increasing
attention in recent years, mainly for gas sensing applications, including
environmental monitoring and air quality assessment.
,
Conducting polymers and organic-based nanostructured sensors can
detect a wide range of species, including heavy metal ions, explosive
materials, toxic gases such as CO, SO2, NO2,
H2S, and NH3, as well VOCs, water pollutants,
and othersmostly at room temperature.
,
In this context, Figure
and Table
present some state-of-the-art gas sensors based on conducting polymers
and organic materials developed over the past five years for the detection
of toxic gases such as SO2 and NH3.

The conducting polymer BBTBSe, which combines a
thiazole-decorated
conjugated polymer (BBT) with a benzo[2,1,3]selenadiazole ring (BSe),
was utilized as a room-temperature sensor for detecting SO2 selectively, as shown in Figures
a–d. Therein,
the combination of BBT and BSe significantly enhanced the SO2 sensing performance (100 ppm) and exhibited a response value (199.4)
that was 4.3 times higher than that of the BBT sensor (45.7). Moreover,
the BBTBSe sensor demonstrated rapid response-recovery times of 60
and 70 s, respectively. The BBTBSe sensor exhibits selective detection
of SO2 compared to other interfering toxic gases such as
H2S (100 ppm), NO2 (100 ppm), CO (200 ppm),
CO2 (500 ppm), and NH3 (500 ppm) (Figure
a). The authors
attributed improved sensitivity and selectivity toward SO2 to the higher number of N atoms in the aromatic rings of the BBTBSe
structure compared to BBT (Figure
b), resulting in enhanced delocalization of electron
density from N to electron-deficient S during SO2 reception.
As a result, electron density is withdrawn from neighboring C = N,
which disrupts the π resonance of the conjugated polymer rings,
producing an n-type response (electrical resistance
increases) with rather fast response/recovery dynamics between 1–100
ppm SO2 at 25 °C as shown in Figure
c. BBTBSe chemoresponsive signal is higher
than BBT (11.3 vs 6.3 at 1 ppm of SO2), and exhibits an
experimental and theoretical LLOD of 0.76 and 0.23 ppb, respectively
(Figure
d), i.e.,
∼9000 times lower than the guideline (2000 ppb).
PANI
materials are considered promising sensing candidates due
to their high electrical conductivity, good reversibility, ease of
fabrication, low cost, and excellent environmental stability.
Figure
e–h shows a BA/MXene/PANI aerogel fiber-based
sensor for selective NH3 detection, exhibiting an outstanding sensing performance with high
responsiveness of 807% and fast response/recovery times of 24.1 s/2.2
s, respectively (Figure
e), with a LLOD of 1 ppb that is 25000 times lower than exposure
guidelines. In addition, the sensor demonstrates excellent selectivity
toward NH3 against critical gases (Figure
f), and advantageous robustness to higher
concentration interferants and even in gas mixtures.
Increasing
the temperature between 20–50 °C (Figure
g), NH3 response decreases from
341% to 196%, attributed to lower NH3 adsorption on the
semiconductor polymer composite at higher
temperature. When the sensor is exposed to high-humidity conditions,
it shows only a slight variation in response at 90% RH, associated
with the dissociation of water molecules and fewer sites available
for NH3 adsorption. The polymer is a mixed electronic-ionic
semiconductor, and the reception mechanism behind NH3 detection
at the MXene/PANI surface is based on the deprotonation and protonation
of PANI during adsorption and desorption, respectively (Figure
h). Upon NH3 exposure, protons are captured from PANI to form NH4
^+^ ions, leading to a concurrent decrease in both hole-
and H^+^-density. The change in E
F yields measurable electrophysical signals that are amplified through
the p–n heterointerface, with a built-in EDL and HDL on MXene
(lower Φ) and PANI (higher Φ) sides, respectively.
Another conducting polymer is P-BNT, which is based on a novel
π-conjugated poly(triarylboron–boron–nitride–phenylene)
characterized by B–N bonds, fabricated by Wang et al. (Figure
i–l). It is one of many significant contributions
to the field of organic solar cells and
high-performance to NH3 detection, similar to other conducting
polymer materials reported in the literature. This material exhibits an outstanding sensor response of
32’000 to 40 ppm NH3 that is 3000 times higher than
the monomer BN-H (Figure
i and j), along with exceptional selectivity (>5 ×
10^3^) and a fast response time of 102 s, with, however,
long recoveries
due to strong analyte adsorption possibly limiting sensor’s
reusability. This was overcome by combining small monomer BN-H with
P-BNT (1:1) to produce a BN-H/P-BNT heterostructure. Despite having
a lower NH3 sensitivity, the hybrid sensor exhibits much
faster transients with response/recovery times of 65/25 s (Figure
k) and preserved
a very good selectivity (>100), with proven performance under fully
H2O-saturated environments (Figure
l) and a theoretical LLOD of 13 ppb. Therein,
the authors suggested that the monomer BN-H induces interfacial effects
that suppress strong acid–base interactions promoting NH3 oxidation, while enhancing the electronic properties of the
sensing layer.
Devices
The widespread use of air quality sensors in everyday applications is still limited, mainly because current devices lack sufficient selectivity to quantify trace pollutant concentrations in complex indoor or outdoor air that contain hundreds of potential interferants (e.g., >250 VOCs in typical indoor air). Here, we highlight strategies to bridge the critical gap between (a) identifying promising sensing materials or chemistries (Section ) and (b) turning them into devices that can operate reliably in real-world settings. Before doing so, we briefly review the engineering challenges of implementing semiconductor gas sensors in compact, low-power formats and how MEMS-type microhot-plate (MHP) technology makes their power consumption compatible with battery-operated and portable systems.
We give a general overview of how modern MHP gas sensors are built
and the criticality of their mechanical and thermal design. In Figure
a, a typical MHP
is shown with a small silicon island suspended on a thin dielectric
membrane obtained by etching. An embedded PMOS transistor serves as
a heater and a polysilicon resistor acts as a temperature sensor for
the control loop. A nanocrystalline semiconductor film on metallic
(commonly Pt or Au) interdigitated electrodes (IDEs) serves as the
sensing layer. Thanks to the low thermal
mass of the membrane and its suspension, the power needed to reach
a few hundred degrees °C is in the order of some tens of mW,
whereas the surrounding chip with its readout electronics remains
unheated. Figure
b shows the cross-section of such a MHP coated with a porous, flame-aerosol-deposited
MO*
x
![12: (a) Schematics
of a MEMS-type MHP: a small silicon island on a
thin dielectric membrane is heated by an integrated MOS transistor,
as monitored by a polysilicon temperature sensor, and contacted by
interdigitated electrodes that support a nanocrystalline semiconductor
film. Reproduced from ref . Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society. (b) Cross-section
SEM image of MHP-supported MO*
x
From a historical perspective, two types of MHP have been extensively studied. In so-called closed-type membrane MHPs, the thin diaphragm spans the entire cavity. According to finite element analysis calculations, this design is mechanically robust and relatively easy to fabricate, at the expense of broad heat-induced dome-shaped deflection, significant mechanical stress at the clamped edges, and higher heat transfer into the substrate that leads to larger power consumption. On the other hand, in a suspended-type membrane design, only a small central platform is left and held by narrow beams that strongly reduce heat transfer, yielding lower power consumption, and the hot zone is sharply confined to the sensing area. However, stress and bending induced by thermal deflection are concentrated in the beams, so careful engineering is required to avoid failure. Moving from closed to suspended membranes has been a key achievement in the microfabrication of gas sensors to reduce power consumption from hundreds to a few tens of mW at typical operational temperatures, while also keeping the embedded electronics for signal conditioning safely below their maximum operating temperatures.
A key step is the chemoresistive film preparation (Figure c), a demanding task especially in the small area of interdigitated electrodes of suspended-membrane MHPs. Therein, a reliable, consistent, reproducible preparation of the sensing layer is key and essential also for thicker ceramics-based chips used in “fundamental” sensor research with the aim to obtain mechanistic insights and further tailor materials design, as discussed throughout Section . Screen-and inkjet printing of suspensions containing semiconductive nanoparticles are robust and probably most established for the deposition of sensing films on MHPs. Thereby, the formulation of stable and functional suspensions is particularly challenging to avoid, for instance, in the case of inkjet printing, the formation of satellite droplets or splashing under operational conditions. , Also frequently used are drop-casting of suspensions or sol–gels that can be confined to the interdigitated electrode area, but film uniformity can be compromised by the coffee-ring effect. Sputtering and thermal or e-beam evaporation provide dense or only moderately porous thin films with excellent thickness control. Chemical vapor deposited films can be grown very conformally, also on complex MEMS topographies. Aerosol deposition allows direct deposition of very porous nanoparticle films by thermophoresis or denser films by impaction with variable film adhesion strength to the membrane.
As shown in Figure
d,e, a suspended-membrane MHP can reach
400 °C with less than
60 mW, and its temperature can be achieved within ms. Such fast and efficient heating makes it easy
to run temperature-cycling schemes,
,
where the
sensor is periodically heated and cooled to extract richer response
patterns and to speed up gas adsorption and desorption. Furthermore,
the film morphology can critically affect sensor performance. In a
previous study, a dry bromination of an aerosol-deposited CuO film
to CuBr yielded much higher porosity than wet-bromination (43 vs 78%). As shown in Figure
f, the highly porous CuBr sensor showed
a larger and faster response to the air pollutant NH3 (Table
) in humid air, attributed
to its open structure facilitating fast mass transfer within the mesoporous
film. As a result, deposition methods that promote porous or hierarchical
architectures can boost performance; yet, their interplay with the
mechanical and thermal constraints of MEMS MHPs remains only partially
explored.
the Selectivity
The critical challenge for semiconductor gas sensors remains their often insufficient chemical specificity, especially when analyzing real-world gas mixtures with many potential interferants. Once the MHP platform is in place, selectivity can be further enhanced by combining several, differently selective sensors to arrays (so-called electronic noses) , that have, for instance, led to promising discrimination in wearable sensor devices. , Processing their signals, in some cases with integrated ML–assisted methods, enables enhanced selectivity and/or simultaneous multitracer detection, , concepts that have been reviewed recently elsewhere. , Another simple but powerful approach is to precondition the gas mixture before it reaches the sensor. Filters before and overlayers on top of the sensing film alter the analyte matrix by exploiting (1) differences in physi/chemisorption strength or (2) chemical reactivity. In this section, we focus on sorption and catalytic filters, which have shown particular promise for turning laboratory sensor concepts into deployable devices.
In a sorption filter, a packed-bed of adsorbent particles
(for example, Tenax TA, a hydrophobic polymer) acts as a miniaturized gas chromatography (GC) column placed
upstream of an otherwise nonspecific sensor. As shown in Figure
a, in the simplest
linear-chromatography description, and neglecting axial dispersion
and mass transfer, the inverse analyte speed, dt/dz, scales with a combination of bed-void fraction (ε),
analyte’s thermodynamic adsorption strength (H
i), and the inverse interstitial velocity (u). Consequently, not only the choice
of sorbent but also filter-assembly parameters such as packing density,
diameter, and length must be tuned to obtain the desired separation
(Figure
b)a
design space that is, of course, well covered by high-performance
GC manufacturers but still needs more attention in the context of
low-cost sensor systems.
![13: (a) Working principle of a sorption
a packed bed behaves
like a miniaturized GC column and temporally separates analytes according
to their different retention time (τR). (b) Schematic
elution order for three VOCs with different τR. (c)
Example separation of methanol (red), ethanol (blue), and acetone
(green) on a hydrophobic sorption bed, where methanol elutes first.
(d) The separated peaks are detected downstream by a single MO*
x
In the example of Figure
c, when feeding a ethanol:acetone
mixture for a certain
duration (GC pulse, τp), their distinct retention
times (τR) allow the fairly nonselective MO*
x
Catalytic filters offer a very promising route to meet the
stringent
selectivity requirements of real-world gas sensing and to overcome
some intrinsic limitations of sorption-based preseparation. In fact,
in miniaturized sensor systems with sorption columns, strongly retained
analytes elute only after long delay times; their peaks are broadened
and flattened by axial dispersion (reducing sensitivity), and the
measurement itself is inherently discontinuous because the sensor
can only be read out during short elution windows. In contrast, catalytic
filters discriminate species through oxidation kinetics over heated
catalyst beds rather than τR. As the gas matrix passes
through the catalyst (Figure
f), interferants and target molecules are, in principle, converted
at (i) different rates and (ii) different
products. For trace analytes in air, where O2 is
present in excess, the surface reaction rate is well approximated
as pseudo-first-order; integrating the
reaction rate along the residence time coordinate yields an exponentially
decaying concentration profile. In some cases, target analytes may
be only mildly reactive and pass through the catalyst almost unaffected
(e.g., red line in Figure
g), while unwanted interferants are converted to “sensor-inactive” species, such as CO2 (so-called
oxidative filtering). In other nuanced
circumstances, the target analyte is reformed on the catalyst surface
to more “sensor-active” species, while
the interferants are still converted to inactive CO2 (so-called reforming enhancement).
As illustrated in Figure
h, a CoCu2O3 catalytic fixed-bed
reactor
operated at 170 °C strongly suppresses a broad range of VOCs
yet leaves benzene intact, rendering a typical SnO2 sensor
placed downstream as a selective benzene detector. In this configuration,
benzene was quantified down to 15 ppb even in the presence of up to
5000 ppb of other VOCs, including chemically similar aromatics such
as toluene and xylene. Despite this
excellent performance, packed-bed catalytic filters require their
own resistive heaters, unless operated at room temperature, which compromises power consumption and increases
the complexity of system integration.
As schematically illustrated in Figure i, catalytic filters can also be implemented as a catalytic overlayer on top of the sensing film to yield more compact integration and to avoid additional heaters. Gas molecules must diffuse through this reactive layer before reaching the sensing material, so the same oxidation kinetics apply but with an effective residence time set by diffusion and film pore size rather than by convective flow through a macroscopic packed bed. In many reported systems, however, the dominant mechanism remains unclear, largely because detailed catalytic characterization (e.g., conversion–selectivity measurements under realistic conditions) in such μm-thick overlayers is challenging. We see a clear opportunity for more systematic reaction studies to guide the design of overlayer architectures that deliberately shape individual sensor response patternsfor instance, tuning xylene selectivity as demonstrated in Figure j. Such overlayer-modified sensors also provide a more informative starting point for sensor array development, where multiple different overlayer structures have already been combined for air quality tasks such as selective detection and discrimination of aromatic VOCs.
Air pollution driven by the release of hazardous volatiles from anthropogenic sources has become a global concern, threatening human health and our ecosystem. Air quality detectors are needed for emission control, but the research and development of suitable sensors has been a challenge due to their interdisciplinary nature at the cross-section of chemistry, physics, materials science, and engineering. Nevertheless, the scientific communities have made great advances in recent years across disciplines ranging from the development of new sensing concepts, materials, systems, and devices to achieve air pollutant detection under real-world conditions.
Our review has identified various
chemoresistive material classes,
ranging from metal oxides (MO*
x
*) to conducting
polymers (Table
),
that are capable of approaching or even fulfilling present air pollutant
exposure guidelines. Notably, a considerable number of these materials
can detect gases such as NO2, NH3, CH4, H2S, acetone, and formaldehyde, some even at low operational
temperatures and under realistic humidity conditions. Yet, the chemoresistive
sensing of other critical pollutants, for instance, volatile halide
compounds or organochlorines such as chloroform (CHCl3)
and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) as well as aromatic ethylbenzene
and styrene, remains mostly unexplored and offers opportunities for
further research. We therefore position this review as a framework
to (i) identify under-investigated pollutant targets and (ii) evaluate
emerging sensor concepts against best-in-class chemoresistive benchmarks
in guideline-relevant concentration regimes.
From a sensor mechanistic perspective, a deeper investigation to obtain useful structure–activity correlations that can inform a predictive sensor design will be needed. Despite a large number of studies performing electronic structure and energy calculations to obtain, for instance, adsorption energies and/or net charge transfer, experimental validation is frequently missing, for instance, by X-ray-based spectroscopic techniques. Even fewer cases, albeit with some notable exceptions, −
perform such material and surface characterization under in situ and operando conditions. This could be explored in future work combining standard catalytic characterizations such as temperature-programmed chemisorption and comprehensive reaction analysis, elucidating both the catalyst kinetics (turnover frequency, apparent activation energy, reaction orders) and product distribution, which have been largely overlooked across the literature.
Other challenges include the reproducibility of sensing performance outside a well-controlled laboratory space, which requires thorough formulation and, most importantly, communication of experimental protocols. Finally, future efforts will enable us to integrate these sensor materials into suitable platforms for alarm systems and mobile robotic devices (such as drones and robot dogs) for distributed and automated air quality monitoring. In summary, the field of air quality sensor research offers significant opportunities for the scientific community to drive innovations with an immediate impact on industry and our society.