Authors: Uxia Gurriaran-Rodriguez, Yves De Repentigny, Rashmi Kothary, Michael A. Rudnicki
Categories: Methodology, Myoregeneration, Skeletal muscle, Tangential flow filtration, Tissue derived extracellular vesicles
Source: Skeletal Muscle
We have recently made the strikingly discovery that upon a muscle injury, Wnt7a is upregulated and secreted from new regenerating myofibers on the surface of exosomes to elicit its myogenerative response distally. Despite recent advances in extracellular vesicle (EVs) isolation from diverse tissues, there is still a lack of specific methodology to purify EVs from muscle tissue. To eliminate contamination with non-EV secreted proteins and cytoplasmic fragments, which are typically found when using classical methodology, such as ultracentrifugation, we adapted a protocol combining Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF) and Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC). We found that this approach allows simultaneous purification of Wnt7a, bound to EVs (retentate fraction) and free non-EV Wnt7a (permeate fraction). Here we described this optimized protocol designed to specifically isolate EVs from hind limb muscle explants, without cross-contamination with other sources of non-EV bounded proteins. The first step of the protocol is to remove large EVs with sequential centrifugation. Extracellular vesicles are then concentrated and washed in exchange buffer by TFF. Lastly, SEC is performed to remove any soluble protein traces remaining after TFF. Overall, this procedure can be used to isolate EVs from conditioned media or biofluid that contains EVs derived from any cell type or tissue, improving reproducibility, efficiency, and purity of EVs preparations. Our purification protocol results in high purity EVs that maintain structural integrity and thus fully compatible with in vitro and in vivo bioactivity and analytic assays.
Keywords: Skeletal muscle, Tissue derived extracellular vesicles, Tangential flow filtration, Myoregeneration
In the past decade, protein secretion mediated by extracellular vesicles (EVs), has emerged as a physiopathological relevant process for distal intercellular communication [1]. Exosomes represent a population of small EVs of endocytic origin involved in intercellular interaction through the transport of essential cargoes such DNA, RNA, or proteins to distal places [2]. Numerous studies have shown the potential of EVs-based therapies as nanocarriers to treat different pathologies [3, 4]. Accordingly different techniques have emerged as standardized protocols to isolate EVs from different cell- derived conditioned media or biofluids [5–7] in agreement with the Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (MISEV) [8, 9]. Recently, tissue-derived EVs have been recognized as powerful role players in physiopathological process compared to biofluid-derived EVs, given the information enrichment from the tissue microenvironment [10, 11]. Despite the extensive research in the field, the clinical implementation of these findings is still far from being translated, mainly due to the technical complexity of EVs isolation and administration for reproducible and reliable experimentation [12, 13].
Particularly, there is an overwhelming evidence for the therapeutic use of EVs in muscle related pathologies [14–21]. In line with this, Wnt proteins, a conserved family of secreted glycoproteins that govern essential developmental, growth and regenerative stem cell processes, are a representative example of long-distance signaling and myoregenerative potential [22]. We have shown how Wnt7a/Frizzled signaling axis plays an essential role on myogenesis and muscle stem cell homeostasis at different levels [23–27]. Deciphering how Wnt7a release mechanisms are regulated in muscle is key for the therapeutic translation of all those discoveries and the implementation of standardized protocols for muscle research. Intriguingly, despite the relative hydrophobicity due to palmitoylation [28], in addition to acting in endocrine and paracrine signaling, Wnt proteins also have been suggested to activate signaling distally through several potential mechanisms such as lipoproteins, cytonemes, and association with soluble Wnt-binding proteins [29]. Recently, several studies have found that Wnt proteins act distally after secretion on EVs [30–32]. Indeed, we have recently discovered that upon an injury Wnt7a is secreted on the surface of EVs. More specifically, we have elucidated the Wnt7a structural motif that is required to direct Wnt7a onto EVs for long-range signaling, and its relevance in the myoregenerative response [33].
We identified the molecular sequence, within the Wnt7a structure, required for EV secretion, which we term the Exosome Binding Peptide (EBP). Mutation of EBP causes a disruption on long-range Wnt7a-EV secretion and a shift towards Non-EV bound Wnt7a secretion. This unprecedented mechanism is mediated by interaction with Coatomer proteins and independent of palmitoylation [33, 34]. Notably, a single intravenously injection of myotube-derived EVs bearing Wnt7a [34] rescued muscle regeneration in Wnt7a-deficient dystrophic mdx mice.
To date, previous isolation protocols for muscle-derived EVs were designed for EV isolation from conditioned media from myogenic cells [35, 36], or EVs derived from tissue after enzymatic digestion [37]. Here, we describe a detailed protocol to isolate small EVs secreted from regenerating muscle tissue explants combining Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF) and Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC). TFF is an ultrafiltration technique that allows the separation of EVs based on size [38, 39]. SEC provides a final purification step to separate free-protein cross-contaminants [40]. Combination these two techniques allow purification of EVs free of soluble proteins while maintaining structural integrity of EVs for downstream applications with an overall improved yield efficiency.
Conditioned media from Wnt7a-transfected HEK293T cells has shown that Wnt7a proteins are secreted on EVs surface, but also as non-EV bound free protein [33]. Here we compared the suitability of the golden-standard procedure for EVs purification, ultracentrifugation [41], with TFF to isolate Wnt7a-EVs from HEK293T cells. Ultracentrifugation purification of Wnt7a-transfected HEK293T conditioned media results in non-EV bound Wnt7a pellet down with EVs, producing a cross contamination difficult to discriminate (Fig. 1A). Conversely, TFF allows the physical separation of Wnt7a non-EV bound free protein that filtrates through the pores of the 500KDa cartridge and is collected in the permeate fraction, while Wnt7a-EVs are retained inside the cartridge as the retentate fraction (Fig. 1B). Note that samples were all run in the same gel, and have the same time exposure. Indeed, the double lipid membrane was not affected upon isolation using TFF (Fig. 1C), compared to ultracentrifugation that can easily disrupt and burst the fragile EVs (Fig. 1D). Overall, the use of TFF results in increased yields with cleaner intact EVs compared to ultracentrifugation (Fig. 1E-F).
Fig. 1 Tangential Flow Filtration allows purification of small EVs free of non-EV bound components. A iTEM of anti-HA immunogold labeling after ultracentrifugation protocol from Wnt7a-HA transfected HEK293T cells conditioned media showing isolation of non-EV bound Wnt7a cross-contamination (arrows) with Wnt7a-EVs (arrow heads). B Immunoblot analysis for Wnt7a showing separation of non-EV bound Wnt7a (filtrate) vs. Wnt7a-EVs (retentate) after TFF protocol. Samples were run all in the same gel and have the same time expousure. C iTEM of anti-HA immunogold labeling after TFF protocol from Wnt7a-HA transfected HEK293T cells conditioned media showing the absence of Wnt7a non-EV bound cross-contamination. Membrane bilayer indicated with arrows. D Comparative TEM of EVs isolated with ultracentrifugation and TFF. E Immunoblot analysis comparing EVs isolation efficiency with ultracentrifugation and TFF. F Comparative size distribution analysis of EVs samples after TFF protocol (blue bars) versus classical ultracentrifugation (grey bars). Scale bar 100 nm. Empty plasmid (CTR), Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). (n = 3, mean ± s.e.m., *p < 0.05)
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) revealed that 96 h following injury, induced by cardiotoxin injection, new muscle regenerating myofibers release high numbers of multivesicular bodies (MBVs) that are filled with EVs destined for secretion. Likewise, the surrounding intersttium in the injured muscle is fully infiltrated with the secreted EVs. Conversely, in uninjured healthy muscle, infiltration of EVs cannot be detected (Fig. 2A). Inmmunogold labeling of new regenerating myofibers showed how Wnt7a is secreted on EVs surface from new regenerating myofibers that produce MVBs containing those Wnt7a-expressing Intra luminal vesicles (Fig. 2B). Importantly, the same type of Wnt7a-expressing EVs were found in the surrounding injured tissue (Fig. 2C). This data suggests that new regenerating myofibers released Wnt7a on EVs to trigger a distal regenerative response. Here we present a specific protocol to isolate those released muscle-tissue derived EVs combining centrifugation, Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF) and Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) (Fig. 2D).
Fig. 2 Wnt7a is secreted on the surface of EVs upon a muscle injury. A Representative TEM image of a muscle transversal projection showing EVs secretion 96 h post injury. Uninjured muscle (1) containing quiescent satellite cells (2), does not secrete or uptake EVs. Conversely, new regenerating myofibers secrete EVs (3) presumably targeting and infiltrating distal injured muscle to exert a myoregenerative response (4). B Representative anti-Wnt7a iTEM labeling of a new regenerative myofiber transversal projection showing MVBs containing Wnt7a-expressing ILVs 96 h post injury. C Representative anti-Wnt7a iTEM labeling of an injured myofiber showing Wnt7a-expressing EVs infiltration 96 h post injury. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Extracellular Vesicles (EVs), Multi Vesicular Body (MVB), Intra Luminal Vesicles (ILV). D Workflow protocol of small EVs isolation derived from muscle injured tissue explants
No pre-acquired expertise is needed more than being qualified to work with animals to obtained the tissue explants. All the other expertise required for this protocol could be easily achieved by a single person familiarized with bench work in a research lab by following this protocol. The entire procedure should be performed under sterile conditions, autoclaving all the non-disposable material but cartridges and pressure sensors could be damaged by the high temperatures. Given that this last material cannot be autoclaved is highly recommendable to install the TFF machine inside of a tissue culture hood to minimize contamination due to the high content of biomaterial and the porous nature of the cartridges where impurities can lead to contamination easily. Also, the required rotors for pre-clarification and last pellet down steps can be difficult to find when there are not several different rotors available. However, in the present protocol, several options have been exposed to make it easier for the researcher.
This protocol has been standardized for muscle derived-EVs isolation with mice from different backgrounds, C57BL6 and C57BL/10ScSN. In our particular case, we have not found differences in terms of yield with different strains for these backgrounds. However, we cannot anticipate that changes in mouse strain could lead to differences in isolation yield. We recommend using mice aged 8–12 weeks independently of their sex, given that very young or old mice could have differences in EVs secretion.
All reagents were prepared and stored according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The use of alternative reagents from other companies may not guarantee the anticipated results.
Resuspend under sterile conditions the cardiotoxin powder to have a stock solution 100 µM. Dilute 1 mg in 1.47 mL of in 0.9% Sodium Chloride. Aliquot and freeze samples at -20 °C. Working solution is 10 µM in 0.9% Sodium Chloride. Working solution needs to be prepared freshly on a TC hood and unused solution should be discarded appropriately. Cardiotoxin is amyotoxin and should be handled with care. Protect the eyes and skin by wearing gloves and working in a biosafety hood.
Centrifuge FBS under sterile conditions at 100,000 g for 90 min using Beckman Coulter Optima L-100XP Ultracentrifuge, Rotor 45Ti (Beckman Coulter, cat. no. 339160) and tubes (Beckman Coulter, cat. no. 355622). Upon centrifugation carefully transfer the EVs-depleted FBS and make 50 mL aliquots. Storage them until use at -20 °C. Note, FBS for use in conditioned media supplementation should be centrifuged at 120,000 g for 18 h.
Centrifuge PBS 1x at 100,000 g for 90 min using Beckman Coulter Optima L-100XP Ultracentrifuge, Rotor 45Ti (Beckman Coulter, cat. no. 339160) and tubes (Beckman Coulter, cat. no. 355622). Upon centrifugation filter the PBS using a Stericup under sterile conditions and storage it 1 L sterile glass bottles.
Prepare NaOH 0.5 M in MilliQ water. Filter the NaOH under under sterile conditions using a Stericup and storage it 1 L sterile glass bottles.
Fig. 3 Tangential Flow Filtration setup. A Buffer exchange bottle showing female/male ports of the tubing circuit. B Auxiliary pump connected to the exchange/washing buffer showing special white tubing for the pump. C Hollow Fiber Cartridge with 500 MWCO connected to the Retentate/Permeate and Feed pressure sensors. D Entire TFF set up containing the machine and the circulation circuit with all the necessary components. E Representative schematic set-up of the TFF circuit. F Representative picture of the recording display measuring the different parameters along the purification TFF process. G Representative picture of the pre-settings pump control for the purification TFF process
Cartridges need to be rinsed before use as they are stored in glycerol. It is recommendable to perform the cartridge activation the day before the purification due to long duration of the procedure.
Critical step. Set up a permeate scale alarm in the settings panel to automatically stop the flow when a permeate volume of 500 mL is reached. Make sure to tare the scale before starting the procedure (Fig. 3D).
Critical step. Verify there is no leaking in the tubing or port connectors and adjust TMP to 5psi in the display. Once 5psi TMP is reached flow to permeate should be 9mL/min and flow to retentate should be 1mL/min. Verify this by checking Q inlet (mL/min), Q permeate (mL/min) and Q retentate (mL/min).
Critical step. If volume in the Flexboy bag is not steady, please modify flow rate of the auxiliary pump. If it is too low, bubbles will appear in the circuit, then increase flow rate, up to 3mL/min maximum. If it is too high, decrease up to 0.5mL/min. Thus, the volume entering the Flexboy bag is equal to the volume that is flowing through the cartridge.
Critical step. Keep the volume in the Flexboy bag steady if not proceed as in step 11.
Critical step. Given the high flux of the main pump (132 mL/min), there is no need to use the auxiliary pump to inject the PBS into the feed flow. Leaving all the ports open, the inherent high flow of the main pump will be sufficient for the washing PBS to get to the circuit.
Stop the flow. Remove the plastic cap on the T-valve and connect retentate flow for recirculation. Initiate the flux with a speed rate of 37mL/min and TMP 3psi.
Critical step. Recirculate 50 mL of PBS and check with pH paper strips if permeate fraction pH decreased up to 7, meaning non traces of NaOH remain inside the circuit that could damage the upcoming sample purification. Otherwise keep recirculating PBS until optimal neutral pH 7 has been reached.
Pause point. If sample filtration is going to be performed the following day, we can leave all the circuit set up already installed in the machine. Otherwise, remove it from the machine and store it in a safe place. The entire circuit including cartridge, tubing and pressure sensors can be stored all interconnected (see Fig. 3D-E).
Critical step. Never store the cartridge and sensors in NaOH 0.5 M, as the material can be damaged as well as difficult to disconnected upon prolonged exposures to NaOH.
Critical step. Is not recommended to perform more than 4 mice per experiment as it would be difficult to handle.
Critical step. Do not proceed to step 3 until you verify there are no signs of reactivity upon gentle pressure on the toes with a surgical forceps.
Fig. 4 Injured muscle explants preparation A Illustrative pictures of Tibialis Anterior and Gastrocnemius intramuscular injection of cardiotoxin injection. B Pre-injured hind limb muscles ready for muscle explants harvest. C Hind limb muscles harvested for explants model. D Muscle tissue fat and tendons pre-clearing. E Hind limb muscles tissue mincing. F Representative picture of dropwise muscle dissemination for explant secretion and EVs release
Critical step. Do not proceed to step 6 until there are no signs of reactivity upon gentle pressure on the toes with a surgical forceps.
Critical step. Each mouse should be treated as a separate single sample to minimize potential contaminations.
Critical step. Ensure that the large fat pad within the gastrocnemius muscle is removed (Fig. 4D).
Critical step. Removal of serum is crucial to allow attachment of tissue fragments to culture dish.
Pause point. At this point, medium can be stored at -80 °C prior to proceeding with EV isolation. However, is optimal to continue with the isolation protocol to avoid any loss of samples.
Critical step. After centrifugation, handle tubes gently to avoid pellet detachment and cross contamination with supernatant.
Critical step. Leave 3 mL of supernatant in the bottom of the Falcon tube to avoid potential aspiration of the pellet and consequent cross-contamination with cells fraction.
Critical step. Leave 3 mL of supernatant in the bottom of the Falcon tube to avoid potential aspiration of the pellet and consequent cross-contamination with apoptotic bodies fraction.
Critical step. Ensure tubes are filled accordingly to manufacture´s instructions with the minimal and maximal volume recommended to avoid spills and damage to the tubes.
Critical step. Centrifugation conditions are calculated based on the JA25.50 rotor. If a different rotor is used, recalculate the pelleting time taking into account the K factor specific for each rotor [42]. Pelleting time depends on the k factor, a parameter that is specific for each rotor. K factor measures rotor pelleting efficiency at maximum speed. The lower the K factor the shorter running time is going to be at the same speed. Smaller rotors have a lower K factor, as the pathlength of the sample to be pellet down is smaller. This is a critical point as longer running times could compromise the integrity of the vesicle.
Pause point. At this point, medium can be frozen in the Flexboy bag at -80 °C prior to conducting the TFF procedure. However, it is recommended to continue with the isolation protocol for optimal EV recovery.
Critical step. Adjust the permeate tubing with a manual clamp (Fig. 3E), to get a positive permeate pressure ~ 0.2 psi to dimmish loss of EV material through the cartridge pores due to the TMP.
Critical step. Maintain the volume in the bag low without allowing it to empty. Flow rate may need to be adjusted (0.5 mL/min-3.0 mL/min depending on sample type). Continue to adjust so that volume is steady, meaning same volume of PBS gets permeated than gets into the sample bag from the auxiliary pump. If the sample is getting too diluted, decrease the flow rate.
Critical step. For muscle explant derived EVs, use double the amount of the starting volume sample due to the high volume of undesired free proteins (e.g. if starting sample is 20 mL, use 40 mL of PBS). However, for Wnt7a HEK293T cell-derived EVs, the same volume of PBS as the sample volume is used to get wash out of the Wnt7a free protein. Adjust the PBS volume, depending on the origin and application of the EVs.
Critical step. To have a better control of this step, do not restart the back-pressure valve to set up the TMP at 3 when permeating the sample. The TMP generated by the main pump feed is enough to permeate the remaining volume of the sample. Otherwise, it would be too fast, and sample can be lost.
Pause point. At this point EVs can be frozen in a Falcon tube at -20 °C.
54Once the retentate fraction, that contains the purified EVs, is collected proceed to pellet it down by ultracentrifugation. To reduce the pelleting time is better to use a benchtop ultracentrifuge instead of a regular ultracentrifuge. Transfer the contents of the sample using 1mL pipette to an appropriate tube
A)Ultracentrifuge L:90 with rotor 70.1Ti and 10.4 mL polycarbonate bottles with cap (Beckman Coulter, cat. number tubes ref. 355603). Run for 70 min at 100,000 g (32,900 rpm for 70.1Ti rotor) at 4 °C.
B)Bench ultracentrifuge with rotor TLA.110 and 3.2mL polycarbonate tubes (Beckman Coulter, cat. no. 362305). Run for 30 min at 100,000 g (49,000 rpm for TLA.110 rotor) at 4 °C.
Critical step. If EVs are for in vivo or in vitro experiments, is very important to maintain the sterility working in a laminar flow hood and with autoclaved material.
Critical step. Depending on the volume, use several smaller 1.5 mL eppendorf tubes with the adaptors instead of 3.2 mL open tubes. The pelleting time is the same.
Fig. 5 Purified muscle-derived EVs with Tangential Flow Filtration and SEC. AUpper panel. Quantification of EVs concentration on the different fractions collected upon SEC. Lower panel. EVs size distribution graphs for F3 to F7 upon SEC, showing how fraction F4 to F6 correlate with small EVs size (fraction of interest) and not before (F3) or after (F7). B Immunoblot analysis showing the expression enrichment of EVs markers on muscle-derived EVs. C Representative TEM pictures of isolated EVs derived from new regenerating hindlimb muscles using post-embedding techniques. Representative of 3 independent experiments. Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC), Fraction (F), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
57Fractions of interest can be combined and pellet down as in point 54 or used directly. If they are required for in vivo or in vitro bioactivity assays is better to filter them using a syringe microfilter of 0.22 μm.
Analyze and quantify concentration following MISEV 2023 guidelines (Fig. 5):
Perform immunoblot analysis with different positive and negative EVs markers (Fig. 5B).
Perform Transmission Electron Microscopy (Fig. 5C).
Critical step. If media contains red phenol, make sure that the colorant is all washed off and the cartridge is not reddish anymore.
Critical step. Recirculate 50 mL of PBS and check with pH paper strips that pH is 7 approximately, meaning non traces of NaOH remain inside the circuit that could damage the upcoming sample purification. Otherwise keep recirculating PBS until optimal neutral pH 7 has been reached.
Critical step. Keep a record of the number of times the filter has been used and how much volume was filtered. Cartridges can be reused multiple times depending on the type of sample and how concentrated it is. With EVs from HEK293T cells, up to 1 L of filtrate can be prepared as long as the cartridge has been washed and stored properly. However, this volume can change depending on the origin of the conditioned media and the conditions of its use.
If pressure remains high, the cartridge may be clogged and needs to be washed or changed.
Tissue-derived EVs have recently emerged as ponderable sources of information with a high relevance due to its clinical potential [10, 11, 37, 43]. However, standardized protocols to specifically obtain muscle tissue-derived EVs have not been implemented yet. The standard procedures for tissue-derived EVs are performed with enzymatic digestion procedures to retrieve the EVs within the tissue [37]. Such an approach has the potential to degrade proteins located on the surface of EVs. Finally, EV isolation protocols are typically based on sequential ultracentrifugation protocols [44]. This implies that large volumes cannot be processed, as the rotors have a limited volume specially for ultracentrifugation steps. Conversely, TFF is readily scalable using commercially available cartridges. Moreover, there are pre-setup tables that allow upscaling smaller pilot experiments to adapt to any volume, even for GMP applications [45].
TFF has emerged as a non-ending filtration technique that isolates EVs, retaining the vesicle inside the TFF cartridge within the retentate fraction, and non-EV bound free protein is filtrated through the pores of the cartridge and is collected in the filtrate fraction [38, 39]. This is a key point when working with proteins that are secreted in several different modes such as Wnt [29]. Otherwise, EVs products are cross-contaminated with non-EV bound free protein, that could lead to false-positive results.
Overall, using TFF for in vivo and in vitro down streaming applications is particularly highly recommended. First, TFF is compatible with highly starting volumes as these types of applications usually require large numbers of EVs. This is a very important point when the secreting cells or tissue that do not secrete high numbers of EVs and large volumes are required to achieve desired yields. Second, TFF allows exchange buffer, in this case PBS. Thus, the final product will be already in the actual buffer further required for bioactivity assays. Third, TFF is a gentler procedure, so the characteristic EV double lipid layer keeps intact. Thus, downstream bioactivity applications are not impacted by the loss of EVs morphological integrity.
Importantly, our EV isolation protocol could be used for other types of tissue explants experiments or for the isolation of cell-derived EVs from conditioned media. However, it would be necessary to adjust the secretion and timing conditions accordingly to the experiment. We have used injection of cardiotoxin into the TA muscle to stimulate Wnt7a expression and EV secretion. Other modes of injury or challenges can be contemplated including exercise, disease status, or hormone or drug treatment. Overall, this is a standardized and reproducible protocol to isolate secreted EVs from injured muscle in a timely and efficient manner.
HEK293T cells were obtained from ATCC (CRL-3216) and verified to be free from mycoplasma contamination using the MycoSensor PCR Assay Kit (Agilent Technologies). Cells were cultured as in DMEM (Lonza) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 U/mL streptomycin and maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator equilibrated with 5% CO2.
Equal numbers of HEK293T cells, 20 millions cells per 150 mm dish, were seeded and pcDNA3_Wnt7a-HA plasmid was transfected with linear polyethylenimine (Polysciences), accordingly to manufacturer’s instructions. Later, transfected cells were cultured with 10% FBS EV-depleted [44] in DMEM (Gibco) and maintained at 37 °C in a humidified incubator equilibrated with 5% CO2. After 48 h of secretion conditioned media was collected for EVs isolation and samples were purified following the protocol described in this manuscript.
TEM on EVs was performed following our previous published protocol [33]. Briefly, EVs specimens were fixed in Karnovsky´s fixative for 2 weeks. Fixed EVs pellets were treated with 0.1% sodium borohydride in PBS. EVs were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min. After, EVs were blocked in blocking buffer (10% donkey serum + 0.6% gelatin from cold water fish skin in PBS) for 2 h. EVs were incubated with the primary anti-HA antibody (Benthly) for 48 h. Pellets were incubated overnight with the secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Immunogold-labelled EVs were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer and enhancement was performed with a silver enhancement kit on the immunogold-labelled cells. All samples were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. Then, samples were dehydrated in increasing concentration of ethanol and infiltrated in Spurr resin overnight at 70 °C. Ultrathin transversal Sect. (80 nm) were collected onto 200-mesh copper grids and counterstained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate and with Reynold’s lead citrate. Finally, specimens were observed under a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi 7100, Gatan digital camera). For our analysis, approximately 50 immunoelectron micrographs were examined per sample at at 100,000X and 150,000X magnifications. Importantly, the same protocol was applied to muscle-derived EVs but without immunolabeling in this case. For detailed information about iTEM muscle-derived EVs please refer to [33].
Immunoblot analysis was performed as described previously [46] with the following modifications. The lysates from EVs were not clarified by centrifugation. The immunoblot transferring was performed onto PVDF membranes.
iTEM was performed following our previous published protocol [33]. Briefly, Tibialis Anterior specimens were fixed in Karnovsky´s fixative for 2 weeks. After fixation all segments were subsequently washed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, and treated with 0.1% sodium borohydride in PBS. Samples were permeabilized with 0.1% triton X-100 and blocked with 10% donkey serum + 0.6% fish gelatin. TA samples were incubated with Wnt7a antibody (R&D). After 48 h incubation, segments were rinsed thoroughly with PBS and incubated overnight with the secondary antibody Ultra small (0.8 nm) Gold conjugated (EMS) in blocking buffer at RT. Later, samples were rinsed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate and post-fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate. Pre-embedding enhancement was realized with silver enhancement kit (AURION R-Gent SE-EM, EMS) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After enhancement, samples were secondly post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. Then, samples were dehydrated in increasing concentration of ethanol and infiltrated in Spurr resin. Ultrathin transversal Sect. (80 nm) were collected onto 200-mesh copper grids and counterstained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate and with Reynold’s lead citrate. Finally, specimens were observed under a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi 7100, Gatan digital camera). For our analysis, approximately 50 immunoelectron micrographs were examined per muscle at different magnifications.
Size distribution of EVs samples was defined measuring the Brownian motion with a NanoSight LM10 system equipped with a fast video capture and particle-tracking software (Malvern, UK). Each video was analyzed to acquire particle size and an estimate of the particle concentration. Each sample was acquired 3 times and average curve was calculated for each sample.
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed with the centrifuged retentate fraction. The pellet was resuspended in 0.5 mL of filtered PBS and purified with a 35 mm column using Automatic Fraction Collector V2, following manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the column was pre-washed with 17 mL of filtered PBS and then the sample was loaded, followed by 12 mL of filtered PBS to allow the sample to flow gently through the column. From each SEC column, 12 eluted 800 µL fractions were collected sequentially. These EV samples were stored at − 80 °C until further characterization.
Wnt7a construct was cloned in a pcDNA3 vector. Wnt7a was originated from a hWnt7a-HA plasmid that was previously designed in our lab and verified by sequencing.
The authors thank Jennifer Richie for the mice colony management, Maria Teresa Rojas (Centro Severo Ochoa, Spain) for technical help with Transmission Electron Microscopy, and Juan Anguita (CIC bioGUNE) for the legal advice with animal experimentation.
U.G.R: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing-Original draft and Funding acquisition. Y.D.R. and R.K.: Performed iTEM experiments. M.A.R.: Writing-Review&Editing, Supervision, Project administration and Funding acquisition.
This work was supported by Defeat Duchenne Canada (MAR). US National Institutes for Health R01AR044031 (MAR). Canadian Institutes for Health Research FDN-148387; PJT-183804 (MAR). Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine (MAR). Stem Cell Network (MAR).
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Housing, husbandry, and all experimental protocols for mice used in this study were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the University of Ottawa Animal Care Committee, which is based on the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. Committee’s reference 1. OHRIe-3868 - Experimental Protocol - Genetic Mouse Models for Investigating the Molecular Mechanisms of Muscle Regeneration [Expires June 30th, 2026]. 2. OHRIb-3826 - Breeding Protocol - Genetic Mouse Models for Investigating the Molecular Mechanisms of Muscle Regeneration [ Expires March 31st, 2026].
Not applicable.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Uxia Gurriaran-Rodriguez, Email: ugurriaran@cicbiogune.es.
Michael A. Rudnicki, Email: mrudnicki@ohri.ca
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.