Authors: Shruthi Narasimha, Rasiq Zackria, Jonathan Hughes, Vijay Jayaraman
Categories: Gastroenterology, cancer, diffuse large b-cell lymphoma, dysphagia, endoscopy, esophagus, Oncology
Source: Cureus
Doi: 10.7759/cureus.51885
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Although it can have gastrointestinal involvement, there are limited recorded cases that show primary esophageal DLBCL. This report discusses the case of an 85-year-old female who initially presented with weight loss associated with dysphagia and was later diagnosed with an esophageal mass by endoscopy. Pathology showed large, atypical lymphocytes, and the final morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings were most consistent with a diagnosis of primary esophageal DLBCL.
Keywords: diffuse large b-cell lymphoma, endoscopy, dysphagia, cancer, esophagus
Non-hodgkin’s lymphoma is the most common form of lymphoma, with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) being the most prevalent [1]. Primary extranodal involvement is noted in up to 50% of patients with DLBCL; the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the most frequent location for secondary extranodal involvement [2,3]. More than 80% of the DLBCLs in the GI system are found in either the stomach and/or small intestine. Most instances of esophageal involvement typically result as an extension of either mediastinal or gastric involvement; however, the esophagus is a rare primary site and accounts for fewer than 1% of all DLBCL cases [4]. We present a case report of new-onset dysphagia that was subsequently diagnosed with primary esophageal aggressive large B-cell lymphoma.
An 85-year-old Caucasian woman with a past medical history of Parkinson’s disease, hypothyroidism, and type 2 diabetes mellitus was initially referred to the advanced gastroenterology clinic for evaluation of worsening dysphagia with associated regurgitation for the past two months. Her symptoms were primarily associated with solid food intake and she reported an unintentional 20-lb weight loss that she attributed to poor oral intake. She denied a family history of malignancies. Although she denied current alcohol, tobacco, or recreational drug use, she reported being a 20-pack-year former cigarette smoker. The patient reported her functional status to have worsened over the past few months and now requiring assistance with activities of daily living due to weakness. Due to her worsening dysphagia, she underwent an esophagram that demonstrated a short segment of mucosal irregularity in the mid-esophagus, a small hiatal hernia, and reflux of contrast in the esophagus. She subsequently underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) that showed an ulcerated hard mass about 25 cm from the incisors. The gastroscope was unable to completely pass the stricture and multiple cold forceps biopsies showed necroinflammatory debris and fibrinopurulent exudate consistent with an ulcer bed with inflamed granulation tissue.
Due to high concern for malignancy, the patient was referred for an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle biopsy. Repeat EGD demonstrated a large, circumferential ulcerated mass at 25 cm from the incisors with luminal stenosis (Figure 1). With some difficulty, the gastroscope was able to bypass the stricture, and the circumferential lesion was measured to be about 7 cm in length. EUS showed a hypoechoic, heterogenous mass invading past the muscularis propria with two affected regional lymph nodes (Figure 2). This led to the staging of this possible malignancy as T3N1. Preliminary pathologic analysis suggested lymphoproliferative cells.
Figure 1 Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showing esophageal ulcerated stenosis (demonstrated by the red arrow) in the mid-esophagus.
Figure 2 Endoscopic ultrasound depicting a heterogenous mass, as measured by the blue line, is seen invading past the muscularis propria.
Microscopic examination of the aspirate showed numerous atypical lymphocytes, many of which were crushed in a background of dense fibrous tissue (Figure 3). Following the review of routine stains, a panel of immunohistochemical stains was performed to further classify the lymphoid population. The large, atypical lymphocytes showed positive staining for CD20, BCL2, BCL6, and CD10. A stain for the proliferation marker Ki67 revealed a nuclear labeling index of approximately 100%. The following stains were CD3, pan-cytokeratin, P63, CDX2, cytokeratin 5/6, P16, BCL1, and CD30. Molecular studies demonstrated gains of chromosomes 8 and 18q. Collectively, the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings were most consistent with a final classification of DLBCL. There was no evidence of double/triple hit lymphoma.
Figure 3 Histopathology with hematoxylin and eosin staining shows large atypical lymphocytes with large nuclei within a dense fibrous tissue background (demonstrated by the red arrow). Micrograph magnified at 200×.
Unfortunately, the patient was considered to have advanced disease and she decided to pursue hospice care.
The most common esophageal malignancies often arise from epithelial cells and usually turn into squamous cell cancer or adenocarcinoma. Primary esophageal DLBCL, a variant of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, is an extremely rare clinicopathologic entity that was initially reported in 1979 [5]. It accounts for fewer than 1% of primary GI lymphomas [6]. It predominantly involves immunocompromised patients, and positive HIV status is a potential risk factor [7]. Fewer than 30 cases of primary esophageal lymphoma have been reported in the literature, and a recent literature review found only 14 cases of confirmed primary esophageal lymphoma without any metastatic disease [8,9].
Initially, Dawson’s criteria was used to diagnose primary esophageal lymphoma. The criteria included mainly involvement of the esophagus, lymphadenopathy limited to only local lymph nodes, no involvement of the spleen or liver, and a normal granulocyte cell value [10]. However, a recent study in 2021 showed that over 40% of patients with the diagnosis did not meet these specifications [8]. Detection of this malignancy is hard due to the lack of specific symptoms as most patients have vague and varied symptoms with dysphagia being the most common. Additionally, gaining diagnostic pathology is made difficult because the tissue needed usually lies deep in the mucosa, an area that regular endoscopic biopsies may not be able to reach [11]. Tunneled biopsies or EUS-guided biopsies may be needed [8,12]. Bite-on-bite tunneled biopsies may yield diagnostic pathology in about 50% of cases but EUS is preferred. In a 2020 review, EUS demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 91.4% and 94.4%, respectively, in detecting T3 cancers. Additionally, this diagnostic modality is preferred because it allows clinicians to assess extraluminal pathology [13].
Age, extent of disease, immunocompromised status, bone marrow involvement, and serum lactate dehydrogenase are all prognostic factors but the exact effect of risk is unknown due to the rarity of the disease. Due to limited data, there is also a wide range of survival, ranging from 26% to 73% [14]. Furthermore, due to the paucity of patients being treated for primary esophageal DLBCL, there is no standard treatment approach for these patients. While chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and endoscopic resection are optional treatment modalities, many oncologists treat primary esophageal DLBCL similarly to other non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma subtypes [15,16]. The most common chemotherapy regimen is R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine sulfate, and prednisone) [17]. This chemotherapy can be used in conjunction with radiation to shrink masses. Surgical subtotal esophagectomy is sometimes considered in localized disease; however, in advanced disease, chemotherapy or radiation is pursued before surgical intervention [14].
DLBCL is a rare primary esophageal malignancy and few cases have been documented in medical literature. Non-specific symptoms and deep pathologic tissue make this a difficult diagnosis to make. Our case report highlights an uncommon diagnosis and helps bring clinical awareness to this malignancy to help providers pursue further testing when appropriate. Further research into the treatment strategies for primary DLBCL would be beneficial given the rarity of the malignancy.