Authors: Dorothy Serwaa Boakye, Mawuko Setordzi, Gladys Dzansi, Samuel Adjorlolo
Categories: Research Article, Medicine and Health Sciences, Medicine and health sciences, Biology and Life Sciences, Biology and life sciences, Social Sciences, Research and Analysis Methods
Source: PLOS Global Public Health
Authors: Dorothy Serwaa Boakye, Mawuko Setordzi, Gladys Dzansi, Samuel Adjorlolo
Mental health problems, particularly depression and anxiety, are common in women and young girls living with HIV/ AIDS particularly in low- and middle-income (LMICs) countries where women’s vulnerability to psychiatric symptoms is heightened due to the prevalent intersectional stressors such as stigma and intimate partner violence. However, no synthesized evidence exists on the mental health burden of females living with HIV/AIDS (FLWHA) in Africa. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the current evidence on the mental health burden among FLWHA in sub-Saharan Africa. A systematic literature review of articles published from 2013–2023 was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). Five electronic databases; PubMed, MEDLINE with full text, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, and Health Source: Nursing Academic Edition were searched for articles published in English. Nineteen articles (15 quantitative, 3 qualitative, and 1 case study) from over 7 African countries met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the studies’ quality was determined to be moderate. The prevalence of depression ranged from 5.9 to 61% and anxiety from 28.9 to 61%. Mental health burden was a logical outcome of HIV diagnosis. Predictors of mental health outcomes in the context of HIV/AIDS were identified as intimate partner violence (IPV), stigma, childhood traumas, sexual abuse, poverty, unemployment, and social isolation. Social support and resilience were identified as protective factors against mental illness in FLWHA. Mental illness had a deleterious effect on viral suppression rates among FLWHA, resulting in delayed initiation of antiretroviral therapy treatment and increased mortality but had no impact on immune reconstitution in the face of ART adherence. Given the high prevalence rates of depression and anxiety and their relationship with HIV progression, it is crucial that mental health care services are integrated into routine HIV care.
Since the beginning of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, women and girls have been most infected and affected. The joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS reports show that globally, more than half (20.2 million) of the 37.7 million people living with HIV and AIDS are females [1]. The numbers recorded in sub-Saharan Africa are even more devastating. Approximately, two-thirds of the estimated 25.6 million people currently living with HIV and AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa are females [1, 2].
Mental health conditions affect females living with HIV and AIDS (FLWHA) at substantially higher rates compared with men living with HIV and AIDS (MLWHA) and HIV-negative women [3–6]. Thus, the established gender disparity in mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety is disproportionately increased in the context of HIV and AIDS [7]. Given the psychological distress associated with managing and coping with the illness, a diagnosis with HIV/AIDS may cause or worsen pre-existing mental illness symptomatology in women [4, 8].
FLWHA’s relative vulnerability to mental health conditions may be due to several intersectional stressors such as unemployment, financial stressors, decreased psychological resilience, limited social support, and increased susceptibility to neuropsychiatric side effects of some antiretroviral therapies such as zidovudine and abacavir [5, 9, 10]. Additionally, FLWHA in low- and middle-income countries have higher rates of intimate partner violence, stigma, discrimination, and social prejudice [10, 11, 12] as well as increased psychosocial stress with HIV status disclosure and sexual and reproductive health management [12, 13].
Higher rates of depressive and anxiety symptoms have been reported amongst FLWHA in several studies [3–7]. For instance, 82% of survey respondents in a study of 832 FLWHA from 94 countries reported having symptoms of depression, and participants indicated that their mental health concerns rose 3.5-fold after receiving an HIV diagnosis [14]. Furthermore, 28.9% of 357 FLWHA ages 18 years and above in an Ethiopian study experienced moderate to high levels of anxiety, as measured by a score of at least 11 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A) [6]. As depressive and anxiety disorders are frequently underdiagnosed among persons living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA), these rates are likely to be higher than reported [15].
Though a substantial burden of HIV associated depression exist in sub-Saharan Africa [16], the majority of the mental health interventions for this population have been developed and evaluated in resource-rich settings and with a limited focus on FLWHA. Along with this limitation even exist a major gap as there is a lack of systematic reviews that synthesize the available research evidence on mental health illness among FLWHA in Africa to direct policymakers to implement cost-effective and evidenced-based gender-specific interventions that are peculiar to our cultural context as Africans. The overall goal of this review was to synthesize the current existing knowledge on the specific mental health issues faced by FLWHA in Africa. Our study may have implications for the United Nations 95-95-95 treatment target by 2025 since the evidence shows FLWHA with untreated mental illness are less likely to adhere to their antiretroviral medication (ART) and more likely to experience virologic failure and HIV progression [17].
The primary goal of this review was to synthesize the current understanding of the specific mental health problems among FLWHA in Africa and describe the relationship between HIV/AIDS and mental health.
The main question that guided this systematic review methodology “Does HIV AND AIDS status negatively impact on the mental health of FLWHA?” (Table 1).
This systematic review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [18] (S1 Checklist). Before the commencement of the review, we conducted an initial search on Prospero and Cochrane Library using the main concepts of the topic in Table 2 to ascertain if the systematic review has been done already to avoid unintentional duplication and redundancy. We noticed that systematic reviews were conducted in the general population but not specific to FLWHA. Again, this search gave us a fair idea about the availability of literature on the topic. During the building process for the search terms, relevant synonyms were identified for each of the main concepts as shown in Table 2. All the key concepts and their synonyms were combined to construct a comprehensive search strategy for the identified databases. The protocol for this systematic review was registered via the PROSPERO database (CRD42023448947). The study focused on studies on mental health burden in females living with HIV/AIDS in Africa.
Articles were included in the review if they focused on mental health problems in females living with HIV/AIDS between 17 and 76 years and published in English in the last ten years from 2013 to April 2023. Articles focused on pregnant and post-natal women were excluded because 1) systematic reviews exist in the literature in Africa on this population and 2) pregnancy and its associated hormonal imbalance are considered covariates to mental health burden in FLWHA [19, 20]. The details of the criteria for inclusion and exclusion have been described in detail in Tables 3 and 4.
For the electronic search, five (5) major databases were selected. A systematic search of electronic databases using pre-defined search terms, supplemented by hand-searching, was undertaken in April 2023. These databases PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE with full text, Academic Search Complete, and Health Source: Nursing Academic Edition. Additionally, the reviewers searched Google Scholar engine, WHO website, UNAIDS website, Ghana’s Mental Health Authority website and approved institutional websites (Ghana AIDS Commission, Ghana Health Service) reporting findings and statistics on HIV/AIDS and mental illness for both grey and published literature. Also, the reference lists of the papers that were chosen for inclusion were used as a snowball for additional studies. Two reviewers (DSB & MS) conducted the final electronic search independently in the selected databases on 24 April 2023 with the help of the designed search strategy.
First, articles retrieved from the various relevant electronic databases and the other sources were title screened by the reviewers (DSB & MS) to determine whether they were relevant for inclusion. Second, the abstracts of the respective articles were also screened to ascertain whether their findings will contribute meaningfully to the research questions of the review. Third, the full text of the respective articles was screened and those that were found significant were added. At this stage reasons for exclusion of articles were provided (see Fig 1). Duplicates were removed manually during the selection process and also by the use of Rayyan, a systematic review software built with artificial intelligence (AI).

All titles and abstracts identified through electronic database searching and hand searching were examined for relevance. Full text articles of any potentially relevant studies were obtained and assessed for inclusion based on the above inclusion criteria. Where uncertainty arose within the examination process, full text articles were subjected to further scrutiny by the inclusion of a third reviewer (S.A). S.A who doubled as project supervisor and reviewer, also assisted with validation and review of a subsection of identified titles and abstracts. Less than 5% discrepancies arose between the authors (DBS & MS) and the third reviewer. These articles were not included in the review. Data from studies that met the inclusion criteria were extracted using an extraction format adapted from a recent systematic review [21]. Data extraction was carried out by the first and second authors (DSB & MS) and, scrutinized by the fourth author (S.A). Information extracted from relevant articles included publication details such as simple size and its characteristics, country, measures used, authors and year of publication. The objectives of this review guided the extraction of the major findings in the included studies.
Using the adapted data extraction format, relevant data was retrieved from each included study for the analysis. The author and year of publication, the title of publication, the country where the study was done, the sample size and characteristics, measure used, prevalence, risks/ correlates, protective factors, impact of HIV/AIDS on mental health, and the impact of mental health on HIV progression were extracted from each including. Special attention was paid to the methods of recruitment/selection of participants, data collection approach and data analysis done for each of the studies. Data were extracted into tables with pre-specified categories as stated previously. For quantitative studies, we collected data on prevalence of depression and anxiety, associated risk factors, impact of HIV/AIDS on mental health and impact of mental health burden on HIV progression. Main findings identified by the authors were summarised. For the qualitative studies, the authors collected information about the experiences of depression/anxiety, risk and coping. Data was extracted and synthesized collaboratively by two authors (MS & DSB). The fourth author (SA) validated and made suggestions on the themes. Some were modified and subsequently included in the review (Table 5).
The quality of the included studies were assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools [22]. This group of tools comprised checklists adopted for a range of study designs that includes a 9-item checklist for studies reporting prevalence data [23], an 8-item checklist for case reports [24] and a 10 item checklist for qualitative studies [25]. The checklists pose a series of questions regarding presence of specific information with response options “yes = 1”, “no = 0”, “unclear = 0”, and “not applicable = not scored” to guide appraisers toward conclusions about the methodological quality of a study or analysis. (See Tables 6–8). The 9-item checklist was awarded an overall score of 9 with scores of 1–3, 4–6 and 7–9 indicating low, moderate and high quality. The 8-item checklist was awarded a score up to 8 with scores of 1–3, 4–6 and 7–8 indicating low, moderate and high quality. The overall score of the 10-item checklist was 10 with scores of 1–3, 4–6 and 7–10 indicating low, moderate and high quality. The response score of each study were summed up to determine if the study was of low, moderate or high quality.
The search and screening processes is illustrated in Fig 1. A total of 19 articles were included in the review. All of these studies were published between 2014 and 2023. Out of the 19 articles, 15 were quantitative, 3 qualitative and 1 case study. The participants were aged between 18 and 76 years. In all 12,299 (adolescents, adults and the aged) made up the entire sample size for the nineteen (19) studies. The major findings in the included studies have been summarized in Table 5 (summary of data extracted from included studies). Most of the studies (n = 9, 52.6%) were conducted in South Africa, followed by Kenya (n = 2, 11.1%), Uganda (n = 2, 11.1%) whilst the remaining were conducted in Malawi (n = 1,5.5%), Tanzania (n = 1, 5.5%), Ethiopia (n = 1. 5.5%) Nigeria (n = 1, 5.5%), and parts of sub-Saharan Africa (n = 1, 5.5%). One study was conducted both in Zambia and Uganda (n = 1, 5.5%). For this review, the themes that appeared in at least two papers were kept.
Data on the prevalence of depression were published by Thirteen (13) studies (68.4%) [6, 26–34, 36, 40–42]. According to the data that were retrieved, the prevalence of depressive symptoms varies from 5.9%, among HIV-positive women in Nigeria [34] to 61% among HIV-positive women in Uganda, [33] demonstrating the lowest to the highest depression symptomatology at different study locations. High prevalence rates were reported by two studies conducted in South Africa 56.3% [27] and Uganda 61%[33]. Relatively lower rates of depression were reported in two studies. Thus 5.9% in Nigeria [34] and 6.5% in South Africa [32]. In a case study conducted in Kenya on a 42 year old unmarried FLWHA, she indicated fifteen (15) symptoms corresponding to mild depression on the Beck Depression Index [35].
The prevalence of anxiety symptomatology was reported in three (3) studies [6, 28, 36] representing 15.8%. The anxiety prevalence ranges from 28.9% among FLWHA in Ethiopia [6] to 61% among FLWHA in Uganda [36]. The reported anxiety prevalence in these three studies in terms of severity ranges from 61.0% [36] in Uganda, 53.0% [28] in Malawi and 28.9%, [6] in Ethiopia. In all, 704 FLWHA made up the entire sample size for the three (3) studies. Two studies reported prevalence rates on both anxiety and depression [6, 36].
Among the 19 studies that formally assessed anxiety and depression, 16 (84.2%) used standardized scales/measures while 3 (15.8%) used semi- structured interview guide [37–39]. Among the sixteen (16) studies, five (5) used the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) [27, 32, 39–41], four used the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25) [26, 30, 33, 36], three used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [31, 42], Five studies used different scales thus, the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) [29], Beck’s Depression Inventory II (BDI-11) [34], Beck’s Depression index [35], the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [6], and the Emotional distress scale [28]. Most of the scales used were developed and validated in high income settings and therefore lacked contextual (cultural and non -specificity to the HIV population) validity. The reliability coefficient of the scales was not reported in a majority of the studies (n = 11) [6, 26, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35, 37–39, 43].
Among the 19 studies included, seventeen (17) studies (89.4%) [6, 25–38, 40, 42] provided data on the risks, correlates and predictors of anxiety and depression among FLWHA in different countries. Regardless of the country, and the type of mental health outcome, these risks factors appear corroboratory. These risk factors arranged in decreasing order include physical intimate partner violence, sexual abuse, HIV/AIDS related stigma, post- traumatic stress disorder, childhood trauma, and higher HIV VL category. Other risk factors included loss of self-esteem, experiences of discrimination, loss of life partners and or other family members, poverty, educational status, victimization, living with people other than direct family members, homelessness, being single or divorced.
In 11 of these studies [6, 26, 28–33, 41–43], a univariate, multivariate or logistic regression analysis showed that sexual abuse, physical intimate partner violence, loneliness, enacted stigma, childhood trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, young age, high viral load, having no formal education, divorce, unemployment and low social support increased the odds of depression and anxiety in FLWHA and was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.005). However, one study [36] showed there was no significant correlation (P ≥ 0.005) between depression/anxiety symptoms and educational status, employment status, and ART treatment status.
Among the 19 studies included in this review, seven (7) representing 36.8% reported on protective factors against anxiety and depression symptomatology in different countries [6, 27, 32, 34, 36, 38, 43]. Specifically, five (26.3%) of these studies [6, 27, 34, 36, 43] reported on social support as a buffer against anxiety and depression. However, a study conducted by Spies & Seedat [32] in South Africa among FLWHA reported that whiles childhood trauma and post-traumatic stress symptoms contributed to depression severity, resilience reduced the severity of depression, acting as a protective factor. One qualitative study found four coping mechanisms, thus “psychological re-framing of negative situations, mobilization of emotional and financial support from inter-personal networks, churches and HIV support groups” as protective factors [38]. In the same study, participants also sought expert help from “traditional healers, medical services, and/or social workers” less frequently [38].
Data on the impact of HIV/AIDS on mental health outcomes of FLWHA was gathered from seven (n = 7) studies representing 36.8% [6, 26, 27, 34, 37, 39, 41] from four countries with relatively different sample characteristics. Among these studies, HIV/AIDS was projected as a significant correlate for depression and anxiety. For example, the study conducted by Spies et al. [41] observed higher rates of depressive symptomatology among women infected with HIV compared to uninfected women. However, three (n = 3) studies, representing 15.8% [31, 38, 40] reported that HIV/AIDS was not an independent driver of anxiety and depression among FLWHA. Two studies also reported that knowledge of HIV/AIDS-positive status and self-disclosure of HIV status was significantly associated with a decrease in depressive symptoms [40, 42].
From the included studies for this review, 5 studies [26, 33, 40, 42, 43] reported on the impact of mental health burden on HIV progression among FLWHA. In Sudfeld et al. [33], Tanzania, it was noticed that depression at the start of ART was significantly associated with a higher risk of death (95% CI: 1.15–3.20; P = 0.01) and an increased incidence of severe anaemia (95% CI: 1.07–2.37; P = 0.02) among FLWHA. Again, in the same study, depression was not found to be substantially linked with the trajectory of CD4 T-cell reconstitution or the likelihood of immunologic failure (P value >0.05) but women with depression had increased incidence of oral thrush (HR: 1.15; 0.84–1.58; p = 0.38) and wasting (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.81–1.83; p = 0.34) [33]. In three studies [26, 40, 43], higher levels of depression were linked to a lower likelihood of being virally suppressed. In Govender et al [40], this observation was more likely among younger women (AOR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.78, 0.97], p < 0.05) than older women. Higher score of depression was also highly significantly associated with less utilization of HIV care services and delayed initiation of ART treatment (p < 0.01) [40]
Over the past few decades, there have been an increasing focus on the mental health of women and young girls living with HIV/AIDs particularly in Africa due to their heightened vulnerability to mental illness in the context of HIV [6]. Secondly, the overburdened social roles, cultural, religious and political marginalization of women [4] even in a postmodern philosophical era further threaten the mental health of these vulnerable population. It is not surprising that research and publication on the mental health of FLWHA has gained a momentum boost. Nonetheless, these research and publications are stacked with individual journals and electronic databases making it difficult for policymakers and relevant stakeholders in the field to have a comprehensive synthesized understanding of the recent developments and evidence regarding mental health burden in FLWHA in Africa.
Based on the overall pooled prevalence estimates, the prevalence of depression and anxiety was 5.9% to 61.0% and 28.9% to 61.0% respectively [6, 26, 27, 29–33, 35, 40–42]. Moderately higher levels of depression (45.4%) [44] and anxiety (29.5%) [45] have been reported in the USA and Canada. This reveals the commonalities and realities of mental health issues among this population even across countries with different cultures, geopolitics and socioeconomic indices. That notwithstanding, the literature shows people who are disadvantaged socially and economically are more likely to develop depression [46]. The high prevalence rate in this review emphasizes the need to integrate mental health interventions in the HIV care cascade with special focus on women.
The prevalence rates varied substantially across the individual studies due to the different measurement scales [57], sample size, and geographical context. Even for studies that used the same measurement scale, information on the item number, cut offs and number of included somatic symptoms varied explaining a part of the variability in the data on prevalence rates. Given the earlier concerns of under detection and under diagnosis of depressive and anxiety symptomatology in FLWHA in Africa due to cultural/religious need to suppress the condition rather than reporting and/or clinically manifesting symptoms [15, 47], prevalence rates higher than what is reported in this study is possible. It is crucial that the existing measures/scales for depression and anxiety are modified and assessed for cultural validity. Dessauvagie et al., [48] has argued that scales developed and validated in high-income settings may be inappropriate in diagnosing and quantifying the magnitude of mental health burden in resource-poor settings. The development of a single validated measure for assessing depression and anxiety in sub-Saharan African regions may be a step in the right direction.
Our study highlighted a number of intersectional stressors that were considered as the most prevalent and strong predictors of depression and anxiety in the context of HIV. These factors individually or jointly mediated at least a part of the relationship between mental health and HIV. For instance, intimate partner violence (IPV) which affects about 30% of women globally and more prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa (36% of women) [49] were identified by four studies [29–31, 43] as a strong predictor of depression and anxiety in FLWHA. Stigma has shown to negatively impact the quality of life (QoL), social and psychological health and well-being of persons living with HIV [4, 50]. The effect of stigma on QoL is revealed in this review as five studies identified stigma [6, 28, 31, 33, 43] to predict mental health outcomes for FLWHA in Africa. A UNAIDS [50] report uncovered that “pervasive stigma and mental health issues are associated with barriers to access to and engagement in health care”. Childhood trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder were implicated in two studies [32, 41] to independently predict depression in FLWHA. The findings in this review align with findings from both low- and high-income countries [51–54]. Collaborative efforts of major stakeholders, health workers, and the community are needed to curb the deleterious mediating effects of these factors on the mental health of FLWHA. Community and healthcare sensitization against stigma [50], the empowerment of women and young girls [55], psychotherapeutic and cognitive behavioural interventions [4] may be crucial and advantageous at this point as such interventions have proven promising to ultimately impact the mental health outcomes of FLWHA.
Social support and resilience may not only have main effects on the mental health outcomes of women living with HIV/AIDS, but may moderate or buffer the negative effects of external and internal stressors on mental health of FLWHA. In one of the studies [6], Pearson’s rank correlation showed that social support had a significant negative correlation with depression. Seven studies [6, 27, 32–34, 36, 43] reported on the buffering effects of social support and resilience on depression and anxiety. In addition to their main effects, social support and resilience may function as moderators [56] to decrease the effect of stigma, intimate partner violence, sexual abuse, childhood trauma and posttraumatic stress disorders on the mental health of FLWHA. Therefore, women and young girls living with HIV in Africa may benefit greatly from mental health interventions that focus on building social support and resilience.
There is enough evidence to suggest that depression is a commonplace for FLWHA and previous research have argued that an HIV diagnosis may exacerbate preexisting mental illness or lead to depression and anxiety symptomatology given the psychosocial distress associated with managing HIV/AIDs [4, 8] especially in Africa. In this current review, HIV/AIDS was projected as the consistent and enduring risk factor for depression and anxiety by seven studies. This is supported by a previous systematic review and meta-analysis [57] that “mental health burden is a logical outcome of HIV/AIDs”.
However, contradictory findings on HIV and mental health outcomes emerged in this review. Three studies [31, 38, 40] observed that HIV diagnosis was not an independent predictor of depression and anxiety. Nonetheless, its association with other risk factors are enough to evoke psychological distress among people living with HIV/AIDS [38]. In addition, the review identified that knowledge of HIV positive status was significantly associated with a decrease in depressive symptoms [40, 42]. These divergent outcomes in the evidence is likely because, as discussed previously mental illness in clinical practice is highly underdiagnosed in SSA [15]. Secondly, the lack of a single validated culturally sensitive scale [57] may also contribute to these discrepancies. Lastly, the lack of training for clinicians and the poor integration of mental health in routine HIV care contribute to the under detection and underdiagnosis of depression and anxiety [57]. Albeit, a UNAIDS [50] report also had this to “Depression, anxiety and HIV are mutually reinforcing”.
The presence of depression in FLWHA in the present review was associated with delayed initiation of ART treatment, decreased likelihood of virologic suppression, increased in opportunistic infections, less utilization of HIV care services and higher HIV- related mortality [26, 33, 40, 42, 43]. Previous studies have also established a relationship between mental health and HIV disease progression [4, 56]. It is possible that mental illness may have clinically measurable biological and physiological implication on viral load and physical outcomes of people living with HIV/AIDs [26]. Relationships in the opposite direction is also likely as a few studies have identified ART mediated viral suppression to be associated with a decrease in the severity of depression symptoms [58]. The findings from this review suggest that the lack of screening for and treatment of depression and anxiety among FLWHA [4] has detrimental effects on their HIV related health outcomes. The integration of mental health services into the HIV care continuum may be an important step towards the achievement of UNAIDS 95-95-95 treatment targets by 2025 and may as well address the bidirectional links between mental health and HIV [59]. Co-integrated mental health services (cognitive behavioural therapy and anti-depressants) within HIV clinics have been found in both lower and middle-income countries to significantly improve the timely identification and management of depression and anxiety among HIV-positive individuals [9, 60–62]. This integrated approach reduces the stigma associated with seeking mental health support [62].
This review has several strengths including the use of evidence from 19 studies. Furthermore, the reviewers followed a clear predefined criteria for including and excluding studies. This approach minimized the potential for article selection bias. Also, this review was conducted following well-documented protocols, and the methods used are transparently reported facilitating the reproducibility and replicability to other disciplines. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed to be of a generally moderate quality allowing for a more objective evaluation of the evidence. The majority of the studies included in this review assessed depression and anxiety using standardized scales.
In spite of these strengths, this review has potential limitations. First, the papers in the final sample cannot represent what has been done in the field of mental health and HIV due to the purposive inclusion criteria used to guide this study. Additionally, our search was limited to 5 databases, and so it is possible that other relevant articles could have been left out. Articles published in languages other than English were excluded, potentially leading to a skewed representation of the evidence. However, they were eliminated because of the cost of translation.
The review’s findings highlight the critical need for the development of cost-effective and culturally appropriate mental health therapies for African women living with HIV/AIDS in order to address the specific challenges and disparities they face. Group-based interventions that incorporate culturally relevant practices, such as storytelling or traditional healing, may show promise in promoting mental well-being among African women. Jesse et al. [63] has demonstrated the effectiveness of a culturally tailored group therapy program in alleviating depression and anxiety symptoms among South African women. Task-shifting initiative which involves training non-specialist healthcare workers or community health workers to provide culturally sensitive counseling therapy to African FLWHA within the HIV care can be adopted. In Zimbabwe, the “Friendship Bench Intervention” designed by Chibanda et al. [64] to train lay health workers to deliver evidence-based talk therapy has shown to be cost-effective and feasible in addressing common mental disorders such as depression and anxiety. Co-integrated psychoeducational therapies rooted in the cultural context of African women can improve mental health awareness and coping skills among FLWHA, mitigating the impact of delayed detection and treatment of depression and anxiety.
There was high prevalence of depression and anxiety among FLWHA in Africa. This review revealed that the increased burden of mental health issues among this population were mediated by intersectional stressors such as stigma, intimate partner violence and trauma. Social support and resilience appeared to moderate the relationship between HIV/AIDS, intersectional stressors and mental health burden (depression and anxiety) among FLWHA. A mediation and moderating analysis are needed in the future to authenticate this.
There were contradictory findings on predictive main effect of HIV on mental health burden. While some studies showed an increased in depression and anxiety symptomatology in the face of an HIV diagnosis, others’ findings suggested there was no significant relationship between HIV and mental health burden in FLWHA. The lack of existing true experimental findings on HIV and mental health outcomes could account for these discrepancies and the lack of conclusive evidence. Future studies should focus on establishing a causal relationship between HIV and mental illness through experimental studies.
The current evidence on depression and anxiety among FLWHA in sub-Saharan Africa is inadequate and non-widespread as the majority of the studies reporting on this public health menace is concentrated in the South and East of Africa. There also exist substantial methodological limitations in most of the studies. Small sample size, unclear justification of sample size used, and unclear methods of recruitment (sampling methods) resulting in selection bias, a decrease in the statistical power and increased alpha. Future studies should employ standardized methodological approaches, use sufficiently large samples and utilize a robust statistical analysis.
Given the frequency of stresses and mental health issues that FLWH experience, as well as the relationship between the symptoms of mental illness and suboptimal disease treatment, a cost-effective, feasible mental health interventions tailored to the unique and cultural needs of this population are crucial [4].