Authors: Renata Cífková
Categories: Review Article, Cardiovascular risk after hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, Classification of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, Drug treatment of hypertension in pregnancy, Pre-conception counselling, Prevention of pre-eclampsia
Source: High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are associated with increased risk of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. It is important to distinguish between pre-existing (chronic) hypertension and gestational hypertension, developing after 20 weeks of gestation and usually resolving within 6 weeks postpartum. There is a consensus that systolic blood pressure ≥ 170 or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg is an emergency and hospitalization is indicated. The selection of the antihypertensive drug and its route of administration depend on the expected time of delivery. The current European guidelines recommend initiating drug treatment in pregnant women with persistent elevation of blood pressure ≥ 150/95 mmHg and at values > 140/90 mmHg in women with gestational hypertension (with or without proteinuria), with pre-existing hypertension with the superimposition of gestational hypertension, and with hypertension with subclinical organ damage or symptoms at any time during pregnancy. Methyldopa, labetalol, and calcium antagonists (the most data are available for nifedipine) are the drugs of choice. The results of the CHIPS and CHAP studies are likely to reduce the threshold for initiating treatment. Women with a history of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, particularly those with pre-eclampsia, are at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease later in life. Obstetric history should become a part of the cardiovascular risk assessment in women.
Keywords: Classification of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, Pre-conception counselling, Prevention of pre-eclampsia, Drug treatment of hypertension in pregnancy, Cardiovascular risk after hypertensive disorders in pregnancy
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) are a major cause of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality complicating about 10% of pregnancies worldwide. This rate is likely to rise due to the increasing age and obesity of conceiving women. Pregnant women with HDP are at risk of developing placental abruption, stroke, pulmonary edema, thromboembolic events, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and multiple organ failure. The fetal risk includes intrauterine growth retardation, prematurity, and intrauterine death, all of which are particularly high in pre-eclampsia. Neonates are at increased risk of preterm birth with low birthweight, prolonged high-level neonatal care, and postnatal death [1].
Due to vasodilation induced by local mediators such as prostacycline and nitric oxide, there is a fall in blood pressure (BP) early in the first trimester. This reduction in BP primarily affects diastolic BP (DBP), with the lowest values being achieved at weeks 20–24 (reduction of DBP by 8–15 mmHg), further followed by a gradual increase to pre-pregnancy values at week 36 [2].
This BP fluctuation is seen both in normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women. Women with pre-existing hypertension may have a greater BP decrease in early pregnancy and therefore the BP rise in the third trimester may be misdiagnosed as gestational hypertension.
Blood pressure usually falls immediately after delivery and then progressively rises over the first five postnatal days peaking on days 3–6 after delivery. It should be emphasized that 10% of maternal deaths due to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy occur in the postpartum period.
A summary of hemodynamic changes in pregnancy is provided in Table 1.
The initial BP measurement should be taken in both upper arms, with following measurements taken in the arm with the higher BP value, preferably in the sitting position or in the left lateral recumbent position during labor. A cuff of appropriate size should always be used with the arm being supported at heart level.
The mercury sphygmomanometer is still considered the gold standard for BP measurement in pregnancy with Korotkoff V phase to be used for DBP. However, as the sale of mercury sphygmomanometers has been banned in Europe, other devices for standard sphygmomanometry or automatic/semiautomatic (usually oscillometric) BP devices, validated according to standardized protocols (specifically for pregnancy and pre-eclampsia) should be used [3]. It is important to note that not all automatic devices are validated for use in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Those that are not specifically validated for this condition showed a tendency to underestimate actual BP levels and are thus unreliable in severe pre-eclampsia. A reasonable solution may be an auscultatory hybrid device with a liquid-crystal display on a vertical column simulating a mercury sphygmomanometer [4], however, these devices are not presently widely used. Wrist BP monitors are not recommended [5].
In hypertensive emergencies, BP should also be measured in both arms and in lower limbs if there is a clinical suspicion of aortic dissection [6].
Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) is superior to routine BP measurement for the prediction of pregnancy outcome [7]. It can help to rule out white-coat hypertension, which is quite frequent in pregnancy [8], and may identify nocturnal hypertension, a finding commonly reported in pre-eclampsia [9].
Home BP measurement (HBPM) is suitable for long-term monitoring, particularly in patients treated with antihypertensive drugs, despite two recently published studies (BUMP 1 and BUMP 2) not showing any convincing evidence. In BUMP 1 (Blood Pressure Monitoring in High Risk Pregnancy to Improve the Detection and Monitoring of Hypertension 1) in women at high risk of pre-eclampsia, self-monitoring with telemonitoring did not lead to earlier clinic-based detection of hypertension [10]. BUMP 2, a randomized clinical trial initiated by the same group of investigators [11], did not find differences in mean systolic BP recorded by healthcare professionals in women whose BP was measured at regular antenatal clinics compared with those who performed BP self-monitoring. Together with tele-transmission of BP data, self-monitoring may become a future solution, saving repeated office visits and hospital admissions [12].
Hypertension in pregnancy is diagnosed if systolic BP (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg, measured in the office or in hospital; it has to be confirmed, preferably on 2 separate occasions or at least 15 min apart in severe hypertension (i.e. ≥ 160/110 mmHg in the obstetric literature which usually recognizes only mild and severe hypertension rather than the three grades used by the European hypertension guidelines) [13].
Hypertension in pregnancy is not a single entity but comprises [1, 13] (Table 2):
Pre-eclampsia is a systemic disorder with both maternal and fetal manifestation occurring more frequently during the first pregnancy, in multiple pregnancy, in hydatidiform mole, in antiphospholipid syndrome, in renal disease or diabetes, or with pre-existing hypertension. It is often associated with fetal growth restriction due to placental insufficiency and is a common cause of prematurity. The only cure is delivery [14]. As proteinuria may be a late manifestation of pre-eclampsia, it should be suspected when de novo hypertension is accompanied by headache, visual disturbances, abdominal pain, or abnormal laboratory tests, specifically low platelet count and abnormal liver enzymes; it is recommended to treat such patients as having pre-eclampsia.
The above definition of pre-eclampsia is in concordance with the 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy [1]. However, the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) introduced a new, broader definition of pre-eclampsia, now being defined as gestational hypertension accompanied by one or more of the following new‐onset conditions at or after 20 weeks of (1) proteinuria; (2) evidence of other maternal organ dysfunction (including acute kidney injury [serum creatinine ≥ 1 mg/dl; 90 µ/l], liver involvement [elevated transaminases > 40 UI/L; 67 µkat/L]) with or without right upper quadrant or epigastric pain, neurological complications [convulsions, altered mental status, blindness, scotomata or headache], hematological complications [platelet count < 150,000/μL, disseminated intravascular coagulation, hemolysis]; or (3) uteroplacental dysfunction (e.g., fetal growth restrictions, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler wave form analysis for stillbirth) [15]. The combination of hemolysis, thrombocytopenia, and elevated transaminases defines HELLP syndrome as one manifestation of pre-eclampsia and therefore additional features of pre-eclampsia should be evaluated.
Pre-existing hypertension is associated with a 25% increased risk of developing superimposed pre-eclampsia [16], which is usually associated with a sharp increase in BP, and de novo development of proteinuria or any other maternal organ dysfunction as defined by the ISSHP.
The 2018 ISSHP recommendations [15] included transient gestational hypertension, which is usually detected in the clinic but settles with repeated BP measurements taken over the course of several hours. It is not a benign disorder, as it is associated with a 40% risk of developing true gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia later in the same pregnancy. Therefore, these patients should have a careful follow-up with home BP measurements.
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, particularly gestational hypertension with or without proteinuria, may induce changes in the hematologic, renal, and hepatic profiles that may adversely affect both neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Basic laboratory investigations recommended for monitoring patients with hypertension in pregnancy are presented in Table 3. All pregnant women should be assessed for proteinuria in early pregnancy to rule out pre-existing renal disease and, in the second half of pregnancy, to screen for pre-eclampsia. A positive dipstick test (≥ 1+) should prompt further investigations including an albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), which can be quickly determined in a single spot urine sample. A value < 30 mg/mmol (0.3 mg/mg) can reliably rule out proteinuria, but a positive test should possibly be followed by a 24-h urine collection. If proteinuria exceeds 2 g/day, close monitoring is warranted. It should be noted that 24-h urine collection is often inaccurate and delays the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. Thus, an ACR cutoff of ≥ 30 mg/mmol (0.3 mg/mg) can be used to identify significant proteinuria.
The following investigations may be considered additionally to the basic laboratory
All women with known pre-existing hypertension should receive pre-conception counselling aimed at ruling out possible secondary causes of hypertension and informing them about the high risk of developing pre-eclampsia, which could be reduced by a low dose of aspirin [23]. Renal Doppler ultrasound is suggested to be performed in all hypertensive women planning pregnancy. If fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is diagnosed before pregnancy, a search for other potential arterial damage in other vascular beds should follow [24]. Determination of urine metanephrine and normetanephrine assays in all pregnant women with hypertension is recommended by some authors [22] as a screening for pheochromocytma, which may be completely asymptomatic and, if not diagnosed before labor, fatal.
During pregnancy, a pheochromocytoma is among the most life-threatening conditions for both the mother and fetus. Although extremely rare (0.002% of all pregnancies), this tumor is infamous for its devastating consequences [25]. The signs and symptoms are variable but not specific, as is the case with non-pregnant women. Hypertension is only of one of the most dominant signs. If left undiagnosed, maternal and fetal mortality is around 50%. Early detection and adequate treatment during pregnancy lower the maternal and fetal mortality to < 5 and < 15%, respectively. For the biochemical diagnosis, plasma or urinary metanephrines are the test of choice since they have the highest sensitivity and the highest negative predictive value. For reliable localization, magnetic resonance imaging is the most suitable technique, having a sensitivity of more than 90%. When a pheochromocytoma is diagnosed in pregnancy, a laparoscopic adrenalectomy should be performed after 10–14 days of drug pretreatment (as in non-pregnant patients), using alpha-adrenoreceptor blockade combined with beta-adrenergic blockade started some days later. If the pheochromocytoma is diagnosed during the third trimester, the patient should be managed until the fetus is viable using the same drug regimen as for the surgical preparation. Caesarian section with tumor removal in the same session or at a later stage is preferred, as vaginal delivery is possibly associated with higher mortality.
Primary aldosteronism (PA), the most common cause of secondary hypertension outside of pregnancy, is underdiagnosed in pregnancy. Women with known PA before pregnancy or with clinical suspicion in early pregnancy should have a close laboratory work-up. However, optimal management of PA during pregnancy has not been established regarding the safety of mineralocorticoid antagonists and amiloride. It is also unclear if laparoscopic adrenalectomy of adrenal adenoma will improve the prognosis [26]. Eplerenone on top of the usual BP lowering treatment may be considered for uncontrolled hypertension in the second trimester [27]. Hypokalemia and BP may be aggravated postpartum due to the decrease in progesterone [26, 27].
Women at high or moderate risk of pre-eclampsia should be advised to take 100–150 mg of aspirin daily from 12 weeks to weeks 36–37 [1, 13, 23].
High risk of pre-eclampsia includes any of the
Moderate risk of pre-eclampsia includes ≥ 1 of the following risk
There is growing evidence that assisted reproductive technology (ART) is associated with an increased risk of developing pre-eclampsia [28, 29]. The risk is particularly high in frozen embryo transfers [30]. Thus, it is very likely that ART in the current pregnancy will be listed as an additional high-risk condition of pre-eclampsia recommending a low dose of aspirin to prevent it.
Calcium supplementation (at least 1 g/day, orally) is recommended for prevention of pre-eclampsia in women with a low dietary intake of calcium (< 600 mg/day)[31]. Vitamin D deficiency is very common in pregnant women and increases the risk of pre-eclampsia [32]. The beneficial role of vitamin D in the prevention of pre-eclampsia, independent of timing of supplementation, dosage, and maternal age, was shown by a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. [33]. Further research should be focused on the recommended regimen (daily, weekly or a single dose).
There is no evidence that vitamins C and E decrease the risk of pre-eclampsia [34, 35]. On the contrary, they are associated with low birth weight (< 2.5 kg) and adverse perinatal outcomes [36].
The majority of women with pre-existing hypertension in pregnancy have mild to moderate hypertension (140–179/90–109 mmHg) and are at low risk for cardiovascular complications within the short timeframe of pregnancy. Women with essential hypertension and normal renal function have good maternal and neonatal outcomes. Some women with treated pre-existing, mild hypertension may be able to have their medication withdrawn or reduced in the first half of pregnancy because of the physiological fall in BP during this period. However, close monitoring and, if necessary, resumption of treatment is essential.
There are not sufficient data regarding treatment of hypertension in pregnancy as pharmaceutical companies have been reluctant to test drugs in this small market with a high potential of litigation. Child-bearing potential without reliable contraception is an exclusion criterion in basically all clinical trials testing antihypertensive drugs.
The only trial of treatment of hypertension in pregnancy with adequate infant follow-up (7.5 years) was performed almost 50 years ago with alpha-methyldopa, now rarely used in non-pregnant women [37, 38]. Past clinical trials also have not supported a beneficial effect on pregnancy outcome of treating mild to moderate hypertension. There has been no reduction in perinatal mortality, placental abruption, or superimposed pre-eclampsia [39, 40]. The most recent Cochrane Review on this topic showed only a halving of the risk of developing severe hypertension [41]. More recently, a systematic review and network meta-and trial sequential analyses found that all commonly prescribed antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy reduce the risk of severe hypertension, but labetalol may also decrease the development of proteinuria/pre-eclampsia and fetal/newborn death [42].
A normal diet without salt restriction is advised, particularly close to the time of delivery as salt restriction may induce a low intravascular volume. However, women with pre-existing hypertension should continue any salt-restricted diet they already follow [43].
Aerobic exercise three to four times per week (30–60 min/session) is recommended to prevent weight gain and reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes, including hypertensive disorders and gestational diabetes mellitus, unless contraindicated [44–47]. Exercise of low to moderate intensity during pregnancy is particularly effective in decreasing the development of gestational diabetes and gestational hypertension, especially when supervised and when initiated in the first trimester [48].
As maternal obesity may be associated with poor outcomes for both mother and fetus, obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m^2^) are advised to avoid a weight gain of more than 6.8 kg. The recommended weight gain range for overweight pregnant women (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m^2^) is 6.8–11.2 kg [49–51].
The goal of treating hypertension is to reduce maternal risk without compromising the health of the fetus.
With values ranging between 160 and 180 mmHg/> 110 mmHg, there is no agreement on the definition of severe hypertension in pregnancy. However, there is a consensus that SBP ≥ 170 or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg in a pregnant woman should be considered an emergency, and hospitalization is indicated [1] (Table 4). The selection of the antihypertensive drug and its route of administration depend on the expected time of delivery. ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors are strictly contraindicated.
Labetalol, methyldopa, or nifedipine XL can be used for oral treatment. If parenteral treatment is needed, intravenous labetalol seems to be the drug of choice. Intravenous hydralazine should no longer be thought of as the drug of choice, as its use is associated with more adverse effects than other drugs [52] and should only be used when labetalol is contraindicated or other drugs prove ineffective. However, recent analyses of safety and efficacy, found hydralazine to be comparable to both labetalol and nifedipine [53, 54]. Oral short-acting nifedipine should only be used temporarily, e.g. until i.v. access is available, with the second dose administered only after one hour if severe hypertension persists. Short-acting sublingual nifedipine is contraindicated.
The definition of hypertensive emergency in pregnancy pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and SBP ≥ 160 mmHg and DBP ≥ 110 mm Hg or severely elevated BP (DBP > 120 mmHg) and progressive acute end-organ damage such as acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, respiratory failure, or aortic dissection. BP should be decreased immediately by 15–25% with the goal being SBP 140–150 mmHg and DBP 90–100 mmHg. The list of the most frequently used drugs for treatment of hypertensive emergencies is shown in Table 5.
Prolonged treatment with sodium nitroprusside is associated with an increased risk of fetal cyanide poisoning as nitroprusside is metabolized into thiocyanate excreted into urine [55]. Therefore, sodium nitroprusside should be reserved for extreme emergencies and used for the shortest possible duration.
The drug of choice in pre-eclampsia associated with pulmonary edema is nitroglycerine (given as intravenous infusion of 5 µg/min, gradually increased every 3–5 min to a maximum dose of 100 µg/min).
For prevention of eclampsia and for treatment of seizures, magnesium sulfate i.v. is recommended [56, 57]. Most guidelines suggest primary prevention of eclampsia in severe pre-eclampsia with persistent neurological symptoms (severe headache, visual disturbances, hyperactive deep-tendon reflexes). The recommended loading dose is 4 g i.v., followed by continuous infusion of 1 g per hour until delivery for a maximum of 24 h while monitoring the mother closely.
In the absence of randomized controlled trials, recommendations can only be guided by expert opinion. The European guidelines [1, 13] recommend initiating drug treatment in all women with persistent elevation of BP ≥ 150/95 mmHg and at values > 140/90 mmHg in women
Methyldopa, labetalol, and calcium antagonists (the most data are available for nifedipine) are the drugs of choice (Table 6). Beta-blockers appear to be less effective than calcium antagonists and may induce fetal bradycardia, growth retardation, and hypoglycemia; the type and dose should be carefully selected with atenolol avoided, as it was shown to be fetotoxic. Calcium-channel blockers are considered safe if not given concomitantly with magnesium sulfate (risk of hypotension due to potential synergism). Women with pre-existing hypertension may continue their current antihypertensive medication except for RAS blockers which are strictly contraindicated in pregnancy. As there is a reduction of plasma volume in pre-eclampsia, diuretic therapy is therefore inappropriate unless there is oliguria when low-dose furosemide may be considered. (Table 7). Magnesium sulfate i.v. is recommended for the prevention of eclampsia and treatment of seizures [56].
Future guidelines are likely to be influenced by two randomized clinical trials conducted in women with non-severe hypertension in pregnancy. The Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) assessed whether “more tight” or “less tight” control of hypertension was associated with better outcomes [58]. Most women included in this study had non-severe and non-proteinuric chronic hypertension (75%, 736 out of 987) and 25% had gestational hypertension. Similar to previous meta-analyses [39, 40], the development of severe hypertension was significantly reduced in the “more tight” arm of the study. In the subgroup of women with chronic hypertension, “less tight” BP control was associated with lower rates of small-for-gestational age newborns. Unfortunately, the study has several (a) the sample size was limited, not allowing for subgroup analyses, including that of small-for-gestational age newborns; (b) chronic and gestational hypertension were analyzed together as one group; (c) women with newly detected hypertension before week 14 did not qualify for enrollment ; (d) labetalol, being considered the drug of choice, was used only by 2/3 of women in the study; (e) systolic BP was ignored when assessing the study outcomes; (f) women with prior severe hypertension were more often randomly allocated to the “less tight” control group. Nevertheless, despite all the above limitations, most experts concluded that the study demonstrated that lowering BP in pregnancy to levels which are routinely achieved by non-pregnant women is safe for the fetus [59]. The investigator-initiated Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) project included a much larger study group of women with mild chronic hypertension of gestational age less than 23 weeks [60]. A total of 2,408 women were randomized to a BP goal of < 140/90 mmHg (active treatment) or to control treatment, in which antihypertensive medication was withdrawn or never given unless severe hypertension (SBP ≥ 160 mmHg or DBP ≥ 105 mmHg) developed. In the active treatment group, the study participants were supplied with labetalol or extended release nifedipine or other medication such as amlodipine or methyldopa, based on the patient´s preference. The primary outcome was defined as a composite of pre-eclampsia with severe features, medically indicated preterm birth before 35 weeks gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The primary-outcome events were reduced in the active treatment group (adjusted risk ratio 0.82; 95% CI 0.74–0.92). The overall mean BP was lower in the active treatment group (129.5/79.1 mmHg vs. 132.6/81.5 mmHg). The pre-specified composite maternal or neonatal secondary outcomes did not differ between groups, including small-for-gestational-age newborns. Severe hypertension was less frequent in the active treatment group, with no stroke in either group. The study results support antihypertensive treatment in women with mild pre-existing hypertension to achieve a target BP of < 140/90 mmHg. It should be noted that BP differences were more evident in the first half of the pregnancy. Low doses of aspirin were administered equally in the active treatment and control group (44.6% vs 44.7%).
Induction of labor is advisable for women with gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia beyond 37 weeks of gestation, as it has been shown to be associated with improved maternal outcome [61]. Factors such as fetal well-being, gestational age, and type of hypertensive disorder determine the optimal timing of delivery. Pre-eclampsia lacking severe features is possibly manageable by expectation. On the other hand, eclampsia requires delivery shortly after the mother is stabilized.
Cesarean delivery should be considered only for obstetric indications and in the rare case of pheochromocytoma. Otherwise, vaginal delivery is preferable for women with hypertension in pregnancy. Severe pre-eclampsia, regardless of gestational age, requires prompt delivery either vaginally or by cesarean section.
During labor and delivery, antihypertensive treatment should continue with the aim of keeping SBP < 160 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg.
Fluctuations of blood pressure in the postpartum period are common. After the usual fall in BP following delivery, there is a progressive rise over the subsequent five days. The postpartum period is also associated with a risk of the late onset of pre-eclampsia. Therefore, BP should be checked in all women within six hours of delivery. Transient hypertension may develop postpartum in women who were previously normotensive. This could be due to pain (because of inadequate analgesia), some drugs (non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs for pain relief, ergot derivatives for postpartum bleeding, or ephedrine), hypervolemia after regional anesthesia, salt and water redistribution into the intravascular compartment, or restoration of non-pregnant vascular tone. Mild hypertension postpartum usually resolves spontaneously. However, as late presentation pre-eclampsia is a possibility, it is necessary to check BP at least once a day for the first five days after delivery. It is advised to continue with BP measuring every other day for at least one week after discharge from hospital.
In the postpartum period up to 4 weeks, hypertensive women with the following symptoms should be suspected of having de novo pre-eclampsia: headaches, epigastric pain (possibly accompanied by nausea and vomiting), visual disturbances (blurred vision, flashing lights, double vision, floating spots, etc., dyspnea (potentially due to pulmonary edema), sudden swelling in the face, hands, or feet, or seizures.
Generally, breast feeding is not associated with an increase in BP in mothers. Bromocryptin, used to suppress lactation in some countries, may induce hypertension. All antihypertensive drugs are excreted into breast milk, mostly at very low concentrations, except for propranolol, atenolol, acebutolol (potentially inducing signs of neonatal betablockade), and nifedipine, achieving similar levels to those in maternal plasma. According to many guidelines, methyldopa is still considered the drug of choice for breastfeeding mothers, except for women prone to depression.
Labetalol, nifedipine, and enalapril are suggested as first line antihypertensive drugs for breastfeeding mothers by most guidelines. A list of antihypertensive drugs usually compatible with breastfeeding is provided in Table 8. ACE inhibitors can be used in lactating mothers except in cases of premature birth or renal failure in the newborn. Enalapril is the most widely prescribed ACE inhibitor to breastfeeding mothers because of its safety and favorable pharmacokinetics. It is also used for treatment of peripartum cardiomyopathy.
Calcium channel blockers, particularly felodipine and nifedipine, are considered safe and are therefore frequently used, despite nifedipine not being recommended to nursing mothers by the manufacturer. Nifedipine may be the drug of choice in Black women of African or Caribbean origin.
Labetalol and some beta-1 selective blockers, with the most favorable data being available on metoprolol, are also compatible with breastfeeding and are therefore recommended.
Diuretics should be used with caution, as they may reduce milk production.
Women with a history of gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia are at higher risk of developing hypertension and stroke later in life [62]. Pre-eclampsia was associated with a four-fold increase in heart failure and hypertension, and doubled the risk of ischemic heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular death [63, 64]. Women with a history of HDP developing hypertension within a decade postpartum were shown to have the most pronounced abnormal echocardiographic findings in left ventricular remodeling and diastolic function, compared to hypertensive women without previous history of HDP [65]. The 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines suggest initiating treatment with statins in asymptomatic, middle-aged women with an intermediate 10-year risk and history of pre-eclampsia [66]. HDPs are also associated with an increased risk of developing peripartum cardiomyopathy [67, 68].
Women with previous gestational hypertension may develop endothelial dysfunction and early alterations of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. They may also experience a relative hyperandrogenism which could, together with the metabolic abnormalities, partly explain the increased risk of developing CVD in later life [69].
A recent meta-analysis of 5 cohort studies with a total of more than 180,000 women with HDP and more than 2,300,000 women without HDP showed that the risk of all-cause and vascular dementia was substantially elevated in women with HDP (adjusted HR, 1.38; 95% CI 1.18–1.61, p < 0.01) [70]. There is also growing evidence for an increased risk of alterations in developmental cognition in the offspring [71].
Despite women with HDPs being recognized as high-risk individuals by the 2018 ESC/ESH hypertension guidelines, recommendations on systematic check-ups are still lacking. BP monitoring in the first postpartum months is strongly suggested, possibly by implementing BP self-measurement to be reported to the primary care physician or using e-health technology [72]. Larger validation studies with BP self-measurement are ongoing [73].
Cardiologists and general practitioners should include an obstetric history, regardless of the woman’s age, as part of the cardiovascular risk assessment. Unfortunately, this area is currently lacking data from randomized studies. There is general agreement that women with a history of HDP, particularly when associated with gestational diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or fetal growth restriction, should be closely monitored for the development of CVD. The timing of this recommendation is unclear, but experts suggest setting up an initial review 6–12 weeks postpartum and then at 6–12 months [74]. The examination should include BP evaluation and assessment of other modifiable risk factors [74]. There is a need to develop a CVD risk calculator assessing female-specific risk factors, including hypertensive and metabolic disorders of pregnancy [75].
In high-income countries 2–6% of children are conceived using ART, meaning that, worldwide, at least 8,000,000 children have been born using ART [76]. There is convincing evidence that HDPs are increased in all pregnancies following ART, regardless of the type of treatment [77]. This meta-analysis included 66 longitudinal studies (7,038,029 pregnancies and 203,375 following any ART). These results are confirmed by another meta-analysis showing higher odds of HDP and pre-eclampsia in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization (IVF) or in intracytoplasmic sperm fertilization (ICSI). The risk was particularly high in frozen embryo transfer and oocyte donation pregnancies [29]. Women who conceived via ART in their current pregnancy are advised to take a low dose of aspirin to prevent pre-eclampsia [78].
In 2015 a group of Swiss researchers declared that children conceived by ART have cardiovascular dysfunction and could potentially have increased CV risk later in life [79]. A total of 54 young individuals (mean age 16.5 ± 2.3 years) conceived by ART were compared with 43 spontaneously conceived controls of similar age [80]. Both groups were re-examined 5 years later. Premature vascular aging persisted in ART conceived individuals (impaired flow-mediated dilatation of the brachial artery, increased pulse-wave velocity, and carotid intima-media thickness). They also showed significantly higher SBP and DBP values by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), and 8 of them (15.4%) met the ABPM criteria for hypertension. A significantly lower left ventricular diastolic function was found in another study including children conceived by ART (mean age 12.85 ± 5.8 years) compared to spontaneously conceived controls of roughly the same age [81]. The risk of developing left ventricular diastolic alterations was particularly high in individuals born preterm.
HDPs complicate about 10% of pregnancies and are associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality for the mother, fetus, and the newborn. Diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy is based on BP values (SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic DBP ≥ 90 mmHg) measured in the office or in hospital, preferably on two separate occasions. Ambulatory BP monitoring should be used to rule out white coat hypertension to avoid unnecessary treatment.
Hypertension in pregnancy should be classified as pre-existing hypertension or gestational hypertension. Pre-eclampsia used to be defined as gestational hypertension with significant proteinuria. In 2018 a new definition of pre-eclampsia was introduced, no longer insisting on the presence of proteinuria, but requiring evidence of other maternal organ dysfunction.
Pre-existing hypertension is associated with a 25% increased risk of developing superimposed pre-eclampsia. A low dose of aspirin should be initiated in these women from week 12 to weeks 36 to 37. The same preventive measure is recommended to all women at high risk of pre-eclampsia, such as having had hypertension during a previous pregnancy, currently having chronic kidney disease, autoimmune disease, or diabetes. A low dose of aspirin should also be given to women at moderate risk of pre-eclampsia.
Calcium supplementation is recommended for the prevention of pre-eclampsia only in women with a low dietary intake of calcium (< 600 mg daily). Vitamin D is also suggested in the prevention of pre-eclampsia.
Women with pre-existing hypertension should continue their salt-restricted diet, otherwise a normal diet without salt restriction is advised. Exercise of low to moderate intensity during pregnancy is effective in reducing the risk of developing gestational diabetes and gestational hypertension. Obese women are advised to avoid a weight gain of more than 6.8 kg.
There is a consensus that SBP ≥ 170 or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg is considered an emergency and hospitalization should follow. The selection of antihypertensive drugs and their route of administration should be determined based on the expected time of delivery. Intravenous labetalol seems to be an almost universal drug of choice. For mild and moderate hypertension, methyldopa, oral labetalol, and calcium antagonists (with the most data available for long-acting nifedipine), are drugs of choice. Based on the CHIPS and CHAP projects, the threshold for initiating drug treatment for hypertension in pregnancy may be reduced to 140/90 mmHg.
Vaginal delivery is preferred for women with hypertension in pregnancy, provided there is no obstetric indication for cesarean delivery. Induction of labor after the 37th week, compared with the expectant approach, is associated with a better prognosis in women with gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia. Pre-eclampsia can also newly develop in the postpartum period and should be suspected if a rise in BP is associated with some symptoms (headache, epigastric pain, visual disturbances, dyspnea, edema in the face, hands, feet, or seizures).
All antihypertensive drugs are excreted into breast milk, most of them at very low concentrations. Labetalol, nifedipine, and enalapril are considered safe and are recommended by most guidelines. However, ACE inhibitors should not be used in cases of premature birth or renal failure of the newborn.
Women with a history of HDPs are at higher risk of developing CVD prematurely in later life.
Not applicable.
Open access publishing supported by the National Technical Library in Prague.
The author declares no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest, directly or indirectly related to the work submitted.
Not applicable.