Authors: Himani Tripathi, Preshita Bhalerao, Sujeet Singh, Hemant Arya, Bader Saud Alotaibi, Summya Rashid, Mohammad Raghibul Hasan, Tarun Kumar Bhatt
Categories: Review, Diagnostics, Malaria therapeutics, RTS,S, Rapid diagnostic test, Vaccine
Source: Parasites & Vectors
Malaria is a vector-borne parasitic disease caused by the apicomplexan protozoan parasite Plasmodium. Malaria is a significant health problem and the leading cause of socioeconomic losses in developing countries. WHO approved several antimalarials in the last 2 decades, but the growing resistance against the available drugs has worsened the scenario. Drug resistance and diversity among Plasmodium strains hinder the path of eradicating malaria leading to the use of new technologies and strategies to develop effective vaccines and drugs. A timely and accurate diagnosis is crucial for any disease, including malaria. The available diagnostic methods for malaria include microscopy, RDT, PCR, and non-invasive diagnosis. Recently, there have been several developments in detecting malaria, with improvements leading to achieving an accurate, quick, cost-effective, and non-invasive diagnostic tool for malaria. Several vaccine candidates with new methods and antigens are under investigation and moving forward to be considered for clinical trials. This article concisely reviews basic malaria biology, the parasite's life cycle, approved drugs, vaccine candidates, and available diagnostic approaches. It emphasizes new avenues of therapeutics for malaria.
Keywords: Diagnostics; Malaria therapeutics; Plasmodium species; Rapid diagnostic test; RTS,S; Vaccine
Malaria is one of the most severe and life-threatening diseases. It is a mosquito-transmitted infectious disease and a major global health issue in tropical and subtropical regions. The mortality rate of malaria is very high compared to other protozoan diseases. As per the World Health Organization (WHO) 2020 reports, 241 million malaria cases were recorded worldwide; 627,000 people died from malaria. WHO announced the Global technical strategy (GTS) 2016–2030 to eradicate malaria by reducing malaria case incidence and mortality rates by at least 90% [1]. Malaria elimination depends on (i) preventive measures (including vaccination) and vector control, (ii) a sensitive diagnostic technique, and (iii) proper treatment of malaria infection on time [2]. Malaria is categorized as (i) asymptomatic malaria (caused by most of the Plasmodium species; infected individuals exhibit no symptoms or clinical signs), (ii) uncomplicated malaria (caused by human infecting Plasmodium species; symptoms include fever, moderate to severe body shaking, chills, sweating, anemia, vomiting, and nausea), and (iii) severe malaria (mainly caused by Plasmodium falciparum; symptoms include severe anemia, multiple organ failure, coma in case of cerebral malaria, pulmonary complications, acute kidney-associated injury, blood coagulation problems, metabolic acidosis, high temperature of 39 to 41 ºC, polyuria, and myalgia). Malaria is often fatal when not diagnosed and treated in a timely manner [3].
Five different species of Plasmodium (P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae, and* P*. knowlesi) cause malaria infection in humans. The parasite is infective and motile to the vertebrate host, and the malaria parasite life cycle involves two hosts (digenetic): human (intermediate host) and female Anopheles mosquito (definitive host) [3]. When an Anopheles mosquito bites a healthy human being, it injects sporozoites (infective stage for humans) while sucking the blood meal. These sporozoites are transferred to the hepatic cells (in the liver) through the blood circulatory system. These sporozoites mature into merozoites (exo-erythrocytic cycle) inside the hepatic cells. They are released into the blood vessel and invade the erythrocytes in which they grow and re-invade the fresh red blood cells (RBCs) for the completion of the erythrocytic cycle (asexual stage) (Fig. 1) [3–5].
Fig. 1 Life cycle of malaria parasite
In the erythrocytic cycle, merozoites convert into ring-stage trophozoites, further developing into mature trophozoites and then into schizonts, and this development cycle takes around 48 h for P. falciparum. Later, schizonts rupture and release 8 to 36 merozoites to invade the new RBCs and continue the cycle where some of the merozoites undergo sexual development and mature into the male and female gametocytes (infective stage for mosquito); this process is called gametocytogenesis [6]. These gametocytes are taken by mosquitos while sucking the blood meal. Inside the mosquito gut, the microgamete (male gamete) fuses with the macrogamete (female gamete) and produces a zygote (gametogenesis) [6]. The zygote matures into ookinetes, which takes approximately 24 h. The ookinetes then develop into oocysts; this maturation occurs between the epithelium and basal lamina of the mosquito gut. The oocysts grow and rupture, releasing sporozoites (formed by asexual replication). The sporozoites are released and migrate through the hemocoel; they invade and are stored in the salivary gland of mosquitoes (Fig. 1).
Malaria is one of the major global health problems and annually causes significant mortality, morbidity, and socioeconomic burden. In the last 20 years, the world has achieved enormous progress in eliminating malaria. Timely diagnosis and effective treatment can prevent human health from diseases, including malaria [7, 8]. Several methods, such as rapid diagnostic test (RDT), microscopy-based analysis, and thick and thin layer blood smear analysis, are available to diagnose malaria. RDT is an accurate, quick, and WHO-recommended approach for identifying persons with symptomatic malaria and high parasite counts, and it is also used outside health institutions (remote areas) where a sophisticated lab is not established for malaria testing [9]. The RDTs are very affordable and straightforward to use. There is no requirement for a trained person. The available malaria diagnostic methods are explained in this review article.
A therapeutic approach can be preventive or curing. A vaccine is the most trusted preventative measure to control many infectious diseases. A vaccine is vital in eliminating any disease because it provides sterile lifelong immunity [8]. WHO recently approved RTS,S vaccine to cure malaria. The RTS,S vaccine targets the P. falciparum circumsporozoite surface protein (PfCSP) and shows < 37% protection against the P. falciparum parasite in the third phase of clinical trials [6, 10]. Several malaria vaccines targeting various stages of the parasite’s life cycle have been tried, but vaccine development against the eukaryotic malarial parasite is still very challenging. This review also discusses the potential malarial vaccines [11]. In addition, the availability of effective drugs for any disease may lower the overall mortality rate. Commonly used antimalarials are chloroquine, amodiaquine, quinine, mefloquine, halofantrine, lumefantrine, primaquine, and atovaquone. These drugs provide first-line protection to malaria patients. Moreover, WHO recommended artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) as the first- and second-line treatment for the uncomplicated P. falciparum and chloroquine-resistant P. vivax malaria [12, 13]. In the ACT approach, artemisinin is combined with its derivatives, such as artesunate, dihydro-artemisinin, and artemether, and given to malaria patients for their betterment. Unfortunately, the malaria parasites are becoming resistant to the existing anti-malarial drugs, so there is an urgent need to develop or identify new potential drug/s against the malaria parasite [9, 13, 14]. This review article touches upon all the aspects of malaria therapeutics, explaining available therapeutics (vaccine/s and drug/s), diagnostic methods, and possible advancement in the respective fields.
Malaria is a severe global health problem that can lead to death if not treated in a timely manner. A drug is a chemical substance (natural or synthetic) used to diagnose, prevent, treat, and cure a disease [13]. Several antimalarial drugs are used worldwide to treat and prevent malaria infection [15]. Antimalarials are divided into several classes based on quinoline (4 and 8 aminoquinolines), cinchona alkaloids, diaminopyrimidine, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, naphthoquinones, and sesquiterpenes [16, 17]. Antimalarials are used as prophylaxis for malaria, and most kill parasites in the infected RBCs. Unfortunately, mosquitoes are becoming resistant to most of the approved antimalarials. Many have severe side effects such as blurred vision, stomach upset, nausea, vomiting, insomnia, headache, loss of appetite, hair loss, and mood swings [18]. One of the focuses of this review paper is to list all the anti-malarials and their drug targets (Table 1 and Fig. 2).
Fig. 2 List of approved antimalarials
Primarily, drugs interact with biological macromolecules (protein/DNA/RNA) in the human body to alter the physiological function and produce the desired effect. Drugs perform specific acts by interfering with macromolecules and altering cellular or biochemical processes, often called ‘drug targets.’ The structure and biochemistry of the Plasmodium parasite were studied very well, leading to understanding and identifying potential drug targets to overcome malaria. Malarial drug targets are classified based on their location in the parasite (e.g. food vacuole, apicoplast, cytosol, membrane, and mitochondria) and their mechanism (e.g. heme polymerization, pyrimidines de novo synthesis, DNA/protein synthesis, TCA cycle, ETC pathway, membrane transport, and hemoglobin hydrolysis). The essentiality of any protein in parasite development makes them potential drug targets [40, 41]. Table 2 and Fig. 3 collect all the reported drug targets for malaria disease.
Fig. 3 Antimalarials targeting the parasite’s life cycle
The vaccine as a preventive measure or to generate herd immunity in the community is essential in eradicating any disease. Some WHO-approved or under clinical trial vaccines for protozoan diseases are Leish-F1 and ChAd63-KH vaccine (human leishmaniasis), Leishmune and CaniLeish (canine leishmaniasis), s48 vaccine (toxoplasmosis in sheep), Mosquirix or RTS,S (malaria) [106, 107]. RTS,S is the only malaria vaccine approved by WHO for its pilot implementation in the malaria-endemic regions. Despite several efforts, RTS,S could generate only 50% protection and a subsequent decline in efficacy after a four-dose regimen. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an improved, efficient, and potential vaccine against malaria. The increase in cases or deaths and drug-resistant strains is dismaying and demands a safe and immunogenic vaccine against malaria.
It has been more than 5 decades since Nussenzweig et al. used irradiated Plasmodium berghei sporozoite to immunize mice in their study and found that mice were protected when challenged with infectious sporozoite [108, 109]. However, mice were infected when challenged with blood-stage parasites, meaning only stage-specific protection was generated. An important lesson concluded from this study was to explore the parasite’s proteome, select essential protein/s from different stages of the Plasmodium’s life cycle, and develop stage-specific vaccine candidates to eradicate malaria worldwide. Stage-specific malaria vaccine could be produced by targeting the life-cycle stages such as (i) pre-erythrocyte stage, (ii) erythrocyte or blood stage, and (iii) sexual or transmission-blocking vaccine (TBV) (Fig. 4) [110]. Keeping this in mind, several proteins or biomolecules present on the surface of sporozoite, [circumsporozoite protein (CSP), cell-traversal protein for ookinetes and sporozoite (CELTOS)], blood-stage merozoite [merozoite surface protein (MSP), apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1)], gametocyte (Pfs230), and ookinete (Pfs25 or Pvs25) have been characterized [111]. For instance, the identification of the CSP and its characterization has created a path ahead for malaria vaccine development [112]. CSP found abundantly on the sporozoite surface is the most potent candidate due to its high immunogenicity. It has a central repeat sequence [Asn-Ala-Asn-Pro (NANP) in P. falciparum], N-terminal region I, and a C-terminal region II which show similarity to thrombospondin and other adhesive proteins (Fig. 5) [113]. However, there is a distinct difference (sequence heterogenicity) between the repeat region of P. vivax VK210 (Type 1) and VK247 (Type 2) strains [114]. A chimeric construct targeting conserved C-terminal and repeat regions from these diverge strains would be suitable against pre-erythrocyte stage infection and prevent the hypnozoite dormant stage of P. vivax [115]. A junction between N-terminal and central repeats was recognized by antibodies specific to NANP repeats. The dual-capacity antibody can bind to the junction region and the NANP region and is characterized as the most potent among other antibodies against PfCSP [116]. Several vaccines have been designed and developed taking CSP as an antigen and tested in mice models [117]. A trend of subunit vaccines has been set employing NANP repeats and the C terminal region of CSP antigen for a malaria vaccine [118]. Further in this review, we will discuss the emerging candidates for the malaria vaccine (Table 3 and Fig. 4).
Fig. 4 An overview of malaria vaccines and their mechanism. a Target stage (sporozoite, merozoites or gametocytes and ookinete). b Vaccine type (whole parasite vaccines, subunit vaccines, recombinant DNA/RNA vaccines) and target antigens. c Immune cell and response (cell-mediated or humoral antibody response). d Mode of action (killing of infected cell or cell invasion inhibition) of vaccine. (e) Vaccine name/s. DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; RNA, ribonucleic acid
Fig. 5 Schematic representation of (a) CSP region I and region II at N-terminal and C-terminal, respectively, and a central repeat region consists of NANP amino acid repeats. The junction region joins central repeat region to N-terminal and a signal sequence and GPI anchor sequence at N-terminal and C-terminal end, respectively. Central repeats (NANP) and junction region induce antibody generation while CD4 and CD8 T-cell epitopes at C-terminal trigger cell-mediated immune response. b RTS,S vaccine consists of B-cell epitopes from central repeat region at N-terminal and T-cell epitopes from region II of CS protein fused with hepatitis surface antigen (HBsAg) at C-terminal along with three copies of HBsAg (not in fusion with CS protein). c Yeast cell producing VLP (RTS,S and R21 vaccines) expressing CSP antigen on surface fused with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; CD, clusters of differentiation; CSP, circumsporozoite protein; VLP, virus-like particle
After Nussenwieig’s research, several studies were performed by taking the whole parasite to develop a malaria vaccine using malaria-infected mosquitoes, irradiated by gamma radiation and allowed to feed on non-human primates and human subjects [108]. The idea was to mimic the natural infection. Complete protection was observed for weeks and months when challenged with infectious sporozoite or controlled human malaria infection (CHMI). Sanaria P. falciparum sporozoite (PfSPZ), a fast-track designated vaccine, has shown promising efficacy during its first and second clinical phase trial and is likely to move into the phase IIb/III trial. This non-replicating whole parasite was purified from irradiated mosquito's salivary glands and injected intravenously [119]. High-level protection was obtained against malaria up to 14 months after final immunization at a 9.0 × 10^5^ sporozoites dose when administered intravenously [120]. PfSPZ or whole parasite vaccine efficacy depends upon the number of sporozoites and dose regimen and the route of vaccine administration. Another method employed to use the live parasite is to inject PfSPZ along with anti-malarial drugs, e.g. chloroquine or pyrimethamine (termed as chemoprophylaxis vaccine PfSPZ-CVac), which kills the parasite and checks the intra-erythrocyte development cycle [121]. However, it does not affect the parasite’s liver stage development and continues to produce sporozoite, which triggers the immune response without causing the disease.
Since the PfSPZ-CVac has live sporozoite to induce an immune response, an increased fold of protection can be generated through this method compared with radiation attenuated sporozoite [122]. In parallel, PfSPZ-GA1, a genetically attenuated parasite (GAP), is a candidate vaccine (phase I/IIa) in which attenuation was obtained through genetic modification in the parasite genome [123]. GAP showcases all the sporozoite surface protein but fails to produce merozoites and prevent progression to the blood stage. In genetically attenuated vaccines, the modifications are being done by deletion of essential genes(s) (single, double, or triple gene knockout), resulting in loss of function or gain of function, or by overexpression of immunogenic protein or toxins (referred to as a suicidal parasite) [123–125]. Several researchers are trying to produce chimeric parasites that express the surface immunogen but cannot perform invasion activity. For example, the P. falciparum parasite expressing P. vivax CSP is a partial functional replacement of CSP and could be an excellent choice for whole parasite vaccine candidate as this chimeric parasite fails to generate infection [126]. The whole parasite or attenuated vaccine is always questioned for safety concerns due to incomplete attenuation and chances of revival of the parasite. Another major problem associated with the whole-parasite vaccine is the production of attenuated sporozoites (irradiated or genetically modified) and their storage and transportation, especially to the remote area of Saharan countries.
Subunit vaccine is the safest method of immunization with the most negligible probability of toxicity and reactogenicity. Also, the scale-up process of recombinant antigens is much easier than large-scale production and maintenance of attenuated parasites, making subunit vaccines a better choice for community immunization. Here are some examples of subunit vaccines for malaria, which are broadly categorized based on their target at various developmental stages of the parasite.
RTS,S (Mosquirix), the first WHO-approved malaria vaccine, has set a milestone in WHO’s malaria eradication roadmap effort [127]. Based on virus-like particle (VLP) technology, RTS,S is a subunit vaccine having CSP antigen (NANP repeats and C-term region for P. falciparum vaccine) fused with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) on VLPs (Fig. 5) [128–130]. Four doses of RTS,S elicited short-lived protection that varied with different age groups and parasite strains [110]. R21/Matrix M, a subunit vaccine, has shown an increased efficacy compared with RTS,S in its second phase of clinical trials, employing the VLP technique and CSP antigen similar to RTS,S [131]. Unlike RTS,S, R21 does not contain hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in a separate form. HBsAg is expressed as a fusion protein with CSP antigen. In response to this fusion protein present on VLPs, most antibodies will be produced against the CSP and not against the HBsAg. This makes R21 (Rv21, P. vivax vaccine candidate) a promising vaccine candidate for malaria in the coming year [131]. However, high efficacy vaccine against malaria remains a challenge.
Various adjuvants have been tested with the CSP-based malaria vaccine for their efficacy, including AS02A, an oil-in-water-based adjuvant, and a polymeric glyco adjuvant p (Man-TLR7) conjugate with CSP, adenovirus 35/26 expressing CSP. The approved version of RTS,S vaccine for malaria, employed adjuvant system 01 (AS01) consisting of MPL A, a TLR4 agonist that induces biased Th1 response, and QS21, a highly purified saponin that does not work through only one such PRR or signaling cascade; instead, they enhanced antigen uptake and induced a strong Th1 and Th2 response [117, 132–135]. R21 formulated with different adjuvant Matrix M, a saponin-based adjuvant, has achieved 77% efficacy in clinical trials.
MSPs present on the surface of erythrocytes infecting merozoites are the most studied blood-stage antigen(s) for drug and vaccine development among all Plasmodium species. This includes MSP1, MSP2, MSP3, MSP4, MSP8, and MSP10, characterized in parallel for vaccine development [136, 137]. MSP1, the prime target of antibody response of naturally acquired immunity during the parasite's blood stage, is often considered for the blood-stage vaccine. MSP1 is a high-molecular-weight protein (185 kDa) with multiple proteolytic cleavage sites. A C-terminal fragment of 42 kDa is found to be immunogenic and cleaves again into 33 kDa and 19 kDa fragments during invasion [138]. This 42 kDa (19 kDa fragment) fragment of MSP1 alone or in combination with other merozoite antigens (AMA1) was tested in clinical trials [136, 139]. Likewise, PvMSP1 (42 kDa) fused with PvMSP8 has been recently tested as a vaccine candidate against P. vivax infection [138]. Controlled blood-stage human malaria infection using inoculum of parasitized blood is a new approach to developing P. vivax vaccine. Currently, vaccine candidates targeting blood-stage which are under trials include ChAd63-MVA RH5 and MSP3-CRM-Vac4All.
Other vaccine candidates based on merozoite antigens for inhibition of erythrocyte invasion or clinical symptom progression are AMA1, RH5, SERA5, and PvDBP (P. vivax duffy binding protein), which measurably fail to generate a protective immune response [140]. Reticulocyte binding protein homolog 5 (PfRH5) can induce antibody response, which can inhibit parasite growth more efficiently than antibody response by PfMSP1 and PfAMA1, suggesting the critical role of RH5 in parasite growth and survival [11]. An effective delivery system and TLR-based adjuvants are required to enhance the immunogenicity of these polymorphic antigens. P27A is one such vaccine candidate that showed good immunogenicity in its first clinical trial and needed to be improved by considering an immunogenic delivery system [141].
Candidates for TBV or sexual stage vaccine are Pfs25M-EPA/AS01 (Phase I) and Pfs230D1M-EPA/AS01 (Phase II). The parasite's blood stage is linked to causing symptomatic/clinical malaria and disease transmission through the transfer of gametocytes from an infected human to vector Anopheles. In parallel with pre-erythrocyte and erythrocyte stage-based vaccines, sexual-stage or gametocyte surface antigen-targeting vaccines are used to treat malaria [142]. Targeting the sexual stage or gametocyte antigen prevents ookinete maturation and sporozoite development, release, and transmission. Still, it does not stop malaria symptoms in infected individuals. The antigens that are being targeted are ookinete surface protein Pfs25, a male gametocyte protein P48/45 (P. vivax Pvs48/45 and Pvs47), Pfs47, and gametocyte antigen Pf230 [143–146]. Cell-transversal protein for ookinete and sporozoite (CELTOS), an anticipated vaccine candidate required for ookinete transversal and sporozoite infection, has shown increased immunogenicity when adjuvanted with CpG or poly IC or both [147]; 25 kDa ookinete surface protein (Pfs25) fused with a complement inhibitor C4b-binding protein IMX313 encoded by ChAd63 and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) viral vector is a recombinant DNA or vectored vaccine candidate for transmission blocking [143]. Recombinant IMX313 protein acts as a carrier by creating heptamer with antigen and generating a solid antibody response [143]. Antibodies that respond to these antigens have been tested for blocking activity through a standard membrane-feeding assay (SMFA). A certain antibody titer level is required to secure the parasite's sexual stage progression in mosquitos. Pfs47 sexual stage antigen display on Acinetobacter Phage AP205 VLP elicited a robust transmission reducing activity (TRA) by antibody at a 5 µg/ml concentration purified from immunized mice [145]. In addition, considering mosquito midgut protein anopheline alanyl aminopeptidase N (AnAPN1) critical for traversal of parasite ookinete in mosquito midgut can be a proven potent strategy for transmission-blocking activity. A second-generation AnAPN1 vaccine construct containing crucial peptide epitopes adjuvanted with glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant and saponin QS21 in liposomal formulation elicited antibody production [148].
DNA or vectored vaccine, ChAd63 MVA ME-TRAP (phase II), is a current vaccine technology to present intracellular antigens and induces a strong CD8 + mediated immune response with pro-inflammatory cytokine production required against malaria infection. Chimpanzee Adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) and MVA, a non-replicating viral vector encoding different malaria proteins, includes 25 kDa ookinete protein Pfs25, RH5, PvDBP, CSP, and multiepitope chain of TRAP (ME-TRAP) [143, 149–151]. Self-amplifying RNA vaccine is a novel vaccine technology that introduces an mRNA construct encoding an antigen Plasmodium macrophage migration inhibitory factor, a Plasmodium protein that can quench the host pro-inflammatory cytokines, and a replication machine for self-amplification [152]. This novel self-amplifying RNA vaccine will minimize the number of doses and reduce the declination of antibody titer over a while. Table 3 summarizes the malarial vaccines, approved or under clinical trial or investigation, along with their vaccine type, target antigen, and mode of action.
Vaccine delivery, antigen uptake, and accurate antigen presentation are crucial for a vaccine's efficiency. A self-assembling protein nanoparticle is a current strategy to present Th or Tc cell epitopes of CSP or other blood and sexual stage proteins [153, 154]. Synthetic or inorganic nanoparticles can be proved to be a safe and novel approach to delivering or presenting antigens without any negative impact in the murine model [155, 156]. A carrier protein is sometimes required to particulate the antigen in nano size and simultaneously works as an adjuvant. Exo-protein A from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and IMX313, a homolog of human complement four binding protein (C4bp), were tested for their reactogenicity and immunogenicity with different vaccine candidates. At the same time, Advax (delta inulin polysaccharide), a co-adjuvant with poly (I:C), increases the half-life of the antigen, resulting in persisting immune response [136, 143, 157].
According to National Institutes of Health, diagnosis is a complex process to identify a disease, illness, or injury by examining the signs and symptoms and comparing them to an existing set of categories that define a particular condition, as the medical profession agrees. Diagnosis is the distinguishing of a diseased condition from health, and it leads to the appropriate treatment and prognosis [158]. Diagnosis occurs at three first, where a class of disease is determined (such as a cardiac disorder); second, the subject to be diagnosed is particularized (such as a 45-year-old male); third, a specific reasoned categorization is made (such as coronary artery disease) [158].
The detection of malaria is essential at the initial stage. Otherwise, the disease might develop severe complications, especially P. falciparum infections, which may be fatal [159]. The review paper explains the available diagnostic methods, such as RDT, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and microscopy (Fig. 6), to detect malaria parasite infection and their recent advancements.
Fig. 6 Diagnosis methods for malaria detection using (a) PCR. (b) Use of microscopy in malaria A blood sample is taken by pricking the finger, and two types of smears can be thick (for the presence of Plasmodium) and thin (for identification of species of Plasmodium). The figure shows how the trophozoite stage is visualized in thick smear and thin smear. c Flow cytometry in malaria Fluorochrome staining and analysis by flow cytometry. d Rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for Cassette and interpretation of the assay results as positive, negative, or invalid. (e) Diagnosis by RDTs using samples other than blood such as saliva and urine. PCR, polymerase chain reaction
This type of malaria diagnosis is based on the symptoms displayed by the infected individual. It is used for diagnosis in case of the unavailability of laboratory facilities or self-diagnosis [160, 161]. Like malaria, many diseases cause symptoms such as fever, headache, fatigue, and anemia at later stages. In ancient times, people found it clinically challenging to distinguish malaria from other fevers. Significantly, the two conditions (malaria and typhoid) were most likely to be confused [162]. Self-diagnosis and self-treatment are prone to errors [163]. Therefore, clinically suspected individuals should constantly be tested using the diagnostic tools available at the hospitals.
A famous German chemist and bacteriologist, Gustav Giemsa, introduced a mixture of methylene blue and eosin in 1904, after which Giemsa staining, followed by imaging, was used for malaria diagnosis [164]. Although advanced diagnostic methods and automatic devices are being developed, the microscopic examination of blood films remains the gold standard method.
Eosin and methylene blue are the two main components that make up the Giemsa staining solution from which eosin stains the parasite’s nucleus red. In contrast, methylene blue causes the cytoplasm to appear blue colored [165]. A thick blood film stained using Giemsa stain is usually used to determine the presence of parasites, whereas a Giemsa-stained thin blood film helps identify the species under light microscopy. Approximately 50 times more blood is examined in a thick blood film than in a thin blood film [165]. However, while staining, 60–80% of parasites may be lost in the case of Giemsa-stained thick blood film [166]. The inexpensive Giemsa microscopy differentiates the Plasmodium species and quantifies the parasites.
Since mature erythrocytes do not contain DNA or RNA, whereas the parasites do, fluorescent dyes such as acridine orange are used to detect the Plasmodium parasites. For this, the patient’s blood sample is incubated with acridine orange, staining the DNA and RNA of different developmental stages of Plasmodium [167, 168]. The fluorescent parasites are then observed using a conventional fluorescence microscope or a fluorescence microscope based on LED [167, 168]. A fluorescent microscope with an interference filter was developed to image the thin blood films stained with acridine orange [169]. Although this method is feasible, trained personnel must correctly label the patient’s blood sample and have the expertise to read the slides.
RDT is a device that detects the malaria parasite and proves to be an important alternative in cases where there is a lack of a microscope or time to scan the blood films [170]. It is a simple and fast diagnostic tool that detects the parasite in a small amount of blood sample (5–15 µl) by immunochromatographic assay, which involves monoclonal antibodies against the parasite’s antigen [171]. Currently, the available RDTs detect HRP2 (histidine-rich protein), pLDH (parasite lactate dehydrogenase), and aldolase [170]. They are more than 95% sensitive in P. falciparum infections, but this sensitivity level has not yet been achieved for non-P. falciparum infections [171]. The RDTs are available in different formats, such as dipsticks, cards, and cassettes [172].
Dipsticks have been used worldwide to detect malaria antigens in the blood. These rapid immuno-chromatographic tests (based on detecting the circulating antigens) are specific to the parasite with the help of specific antibodies attached to a membrane [173]. Dipstick tests were initially used to detect P. falciparum infections only as they target HRP2 expressed by P. falciparum during the trophozoite stage [174, 175]. Examples include Parasight-F, ICT Malaria P.f., and PATH Falciparum Malaria IC Strip [176]. However, newer tests, such as the OptiMAL assay and the ICT Malaria P.f/P.v assay, can detect P. falciparum and P. vivax infections. Both tests can also differentiate between the two species. The OptiMAL assay is based on pLDH detection, and these two parasitic species show antigenic differences in their pLDH isoenzymes [177]. The ICT Malaria P.f/P.v assay targets HRP2 of P. falciparum and P. vivax [178]. The dipsticks are simple to use and handle. They can be used for malaria self-testing, so travelers and tourists visiting malaria-endemic regions are advised to carry them [173]. In febrile cases, they can use these test kits when they cannot reach adequate professional help in time [179].
Cards and cassettes are safer to use than dipsticks as they can prevent blood contamination, but the disadvantage lies in their cost, which is 40% higher than for dipsticks. Another issue is that they are more time-consuming than dipsticks. Most available cards and cassettes target two HRP II/pLDH, HRP II/pan pLDH, or HRP II/pan aldolase [172].
PCR-based tests have improved the limit for detection of malaria infection with < 0.02 parasites/µl [180, 181]. Although PCR detects cases with low parasitemia, it has been observed that it may miss some cases even with high parasitemia [182]. The PCR uses thermostable DNA polymerases of bacterial origin and amplifies even tiny fragments of DNA by using different temperatures at different stages of the cycle. Several PCR approaches are used to detect Plasmodium infection.
Nested PCR involves two consecutive rounds of amplification with two sets of primers. The first amplification product is used as the template for the second round, in which species-specific primers are used [183, 184]. For the first reaction, the primers rPLU1 and rPLU5 are used for the amplification of the genomic DNA of Plasmodium; for detecting P. falciparum, the products of the first reaction are then amplified using rFAL1 and rFAL2, rVIV1 and rVIV2 for P. vivax, rOVA1 and rOVA2 for P. ovale, and rMAL1 and rMAL2 for P. malariae [185]. Furthermore, the PCR products are separated by running agarose gel electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide, followed by visualization under UV light to check which lanes contain products positive for malaria [186].
Real-time PCR or qPCR is used for real-time observation of the replication and amplification process [184]. Fluorescent labels such as SYBR green, sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes, and photo-induced electron transfer fluorogenic primers are used to monitor the amplicon formation [187–189]. This is based on the principle that their fluorescence intensity is closely related to the number of amplification products [184].
Direct PCR assays are also available for Plasmodium detection. In most forms of PCR, DNA extraction from blood samples is a crucial step, but direct PCR bypasses DNA extraction [190]. Therefore, the time, cost, and labor required to get DNA is reduced, but this procedure might miss the asymptomatic infections because of relatively low parasitemia [184]. Phusion blood direct PCR kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) has been used to perform direct PCR using dried blood spots as the sample [191].
Reverse-transcriptase PCR allows the targeting of expressed RNA sequence instead of the gene, which enables the determination of Plasmodium in its specific stages [184]. A real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR was developed to detect Plasmodium by amplifying the RNA and DNA of 18S rRNA genes [192]. It can detect infections with parasitemia as low as 0.002 parasite/μl [184].
During the life cycle of Plasmodium, the parasites invade the RBCs and further grow and multiply in these cells. Therefore, these stages cause clinical symptoms and are the targets for various drugs [193]. Also, the detection of the presence of Plasmodium in the blood is used to diagnose malaria for which flow cytometry has proved useful [193]. The analysis of the development of the blood stages by flow cytometry is reproducible and rapid [193, 194]. Flow cytometry is performed using fluorescent dyes specific to nucleic acids since RBCs do not contain DNA. Any DNA-specific fluorescence detected in the RBC population results from the fluorescent dyes bound to Plasmodium DNA [193]. Therefore, infected cells can be differentiated from non-infected cells, and this method can even be used to determine the parasite’s developmental stage. As the plasmodia multiply in the RBCs, the stained parasites' fluorescence intensity increases during their development [193]. It is a sophisticated approach to diagnosing malaria, but the equipment is expensive and requires trained personnel for operation and maintenance, which would affect the accuracy severely [170].
These can detect parasites at low parasitemia levels, such as 5–20 parasites/µl of blood, but light microscopy, if performed by an experienced pathologist, might detect even lower parasitemia levels [195]. Therefore, the automated blood analyzer is not appropriate as a screening test. Still, it plays a role in detecting additional cases, such as those with no clinical suspicion that lead to a specific request for a malaria test [196]. For determining the species of Plasmodium and parasitemia, microscopy is required as the automated blood cell analyzer, Abbott Cell-Dyn 3500, only lets one know about the presence of abnormal monocyte and neutrophil cell populations [197]. The instrument’s sensitivity is based on pigmentation. Therefore, early infections might not get detected because of the low abundance of malaria pigment in the initial stage [198]. New models with higher sensitivity for malaria detection have been developed [199].
The antibodies to Plasmodium may persist for months once they appear after the erythrocytes are invaded by the parasite [196]. This can be used to diagnose the presence of Plasmodium in the serum of the patients. The immunofluorescence antibody test has been used to detect Plasmodium-specific antibodies in serum samples [200]. The serum sample is applied to a slide on which Plasmodium antigen was prepared and stored at –30 ºC, followed by a quantitative result using fluorescence microscopy to determine the amount of IgG and IgM [200]. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay can also be used for antibody detection [201]. Although these two techniques are simple, they require more time and trained personnel [170].
Samples other than blood, such as body fluids (urine and saliva) or fecal matter or hair, represent an alternative as they are obtained without invasion, thus avoiding the pain associated with invasive procedures and the consequences of the social and cultural beliefs related to blood sampling, leading to an increase in the participation in mass screening programs [202, 203]. Techniques like PCR, immunoassay, microfluidics, and immunochromatography are used for Plasmodium detection in such samples [170].
Malaria detection is a crucial step for proper and timely treatment. Moreover, the two most commonly used malaria diagnostic approaches, microscopy and RDT, can diagnose symptomatic infections but are not sensitive enough to detect low-parasitemia asymptomatic infections. This means that even if asymptomatic people reach the health centers for diagnostic examination, they will probably remain undiagnosed. The PCR can detect disease with lower parasitemia, but those with very low density cannot be detected (Fig. 7) [204]. Several recently developed and emerging techniques seem promising. However, they still have a few limitations regarding detecting certain parasite stages, and discrimination between different stages is also a concern [205]. For example, the detection of dormant stages or hypnozoites of P. vivax and P. ovale cannot be done with the currently available tools [205]. Among the recently developed techniques for malaria diagnosis, one is loop-mediated isothermal amplification, a molecular approach based on the amplification of nucleic acid during which specific genes are converted to loops so that continuous amplification can occur (Fig. 8) [205, 206]. Gazelle is a new device for malaria diagnosis based on detecting malaria pigment, hemozoin. It quickly detects hemozoin particles in the blood sample and is cost-effective (Fig. 8) [207]. Since hemozoin contains iron components, the magnetic field aligns the particles. An internal light source shines a light on the sample, and the measurement is made of the amount of transmitted light in both the presence and absence of a magnetic field [207]. In its absence, the hemozoin particles become randomly oriented because of Brownian motion, while in a magnetic field, the particles become aligned and block light transmission [207]. Since all five species produce hemozoin, this device allows the detection of malaria caused by all five species. A non-invasive, rapid technique based on near infrared spectroscopy has been developed recently, which can diagnose malaria due to P. falciparum and P. vivax through the skin of malaria patients. It uses only a hand-held spectrometer, thus making it a reagent-free technique; this miniature spectrometer is used to shine near-infrared light on the ear, arm, or finger of the individual, and spectra are generated, which are then used for making predictions using machine learning algorithms. The study in Brazil showed 92% accuracy for the arm and 93% predictive accuracy for differentiating between P. falciparum and P. vivax. The bands observed in the spectra enable the identification of positive and negative malaria cases and are mainly due to hemozoin [208].
Fig. 7 The range of malaria infection and a comparison of the sensitivity of three diagnostic microscopy, RDT, and PCR. Microscopy and RDTs are sensitive enough to detect symptomatic infections but not those with low parasite density. PCR is more sensitive than the other two techniques (RDT and microscopy) but is unable to detect infections with very low parasitemia. PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RDT, rapid diagnostic test
Fig. 8 Future tools for malaria diagnosis. a Gazelle device and its mechanism based on magneto-optical detection. b TMek: The iRBCs and hemozoin crystals get captured on the cylindrical Ni concentrators of microchip and the healthy RBCs are sedimented. (c) LAMP for malaria Procedure for DNA extraction and LAMP assay. TMek, Tid Mekii; iRBC, infected red blood cell; LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid
Many efforts are being made worldwide to understand the parasite Plasmodium and the Anopheles mosquito to control malaria successfully. The massive number of malaria cases and deaths distress the African region, tropical countries, and many others. Over the last century, efforts have been made to eradicate malaria globally. However, there are several roadblocks to eliminating malaria, including our understanding of the biology of the malaria parasites, the complex life cycle, and the parasite’s immune evasion. Simultaneously, the parasite has evolved drug resistance against most of the available antimalarial drugs, including WHO-recommended ACT. There is an urgent need to find novel antimalarials with the help of the latest strategy such as computer-aided drug design, fragment-based drug design, high-throughput screening, and drug repurposing approach. Apart from drug development, it has increased the need for an effective vaccine to eliminate malaria. No malaria vaccine can generate 100% sterile protection to achieve WHO's 90% malaria eradication goal by 2030. However, with low efficacy and subsequent antibody decline with time, the world has its first malaria vaccine, RTS,S (Mosquirix).
Following RTS,S, its second-generation vaccine R21 with improved efficacy is also moving forward quickly. The major obstacle in developing immunogenic malaria vaccines is the parasite's multi-stage life cycle, antigenic variation and polymorphisms, limited choice of immunogen, and vaccine candidate evaluation. Efforts can be made to remove these obstacles, and further steps should be taken to improve the efficacy of the existing RTS,S vaccine. This can be done by introducing better adjuvants and new technologies to present more and more antigens to the host immune system. Qubevirus durum bacteriophage and SpyTag/SpyCatcher system are a few to multimerize the antigen on the surface of a VLP [209, 210]. Bacterial vector vaccines expressing pathogen proteins and antigen-presenting cells are new tools under investigation that can be considered for malaria. However, it is too early to know the efficiency of these vaccine technologies [211]. Multiple anticipated vaccine candidates still need to be considered for improvement and newer technologies.
Apart from the treatment, a timely and accurate diagnosis of malaria is an important event that leads to saving humans from malaria disease. Malaria diagnosis is one of the effective strategies for disease management since it is curable if diagnosed promptly. Although many developments and newer techniques are continuously emerging, microscopy remains the gold standard. Several methods are better than microscopy in terms of accuracy or sensitivity. The methods discussed above have certain advantages and disadvantages, and it cannot be determined which is the best or most appropriate among them. It is unknown whether there is an ideal diagnostic method for malaria that is simple, accurate, quick, affordable, easy to handle, and painless. So, the search continues, and we have high hopes for new ideas and techniques. Currently, microscopy and RDTs are the most commonly used methods to diagnose malaria. Still, they will not be sufficient as the world moves towards malaria elimination, and newer techniques are required, enabling mass screening for asymptomatic infections, the surveillance of continued transmission, and the management of symptomatic infections [204, 212]. One such diagnostic technique that has been developed is known as TMek, a lab-on-a-chip diagnostic method that directly quantifies the level of parasitemia (Fig. 8) [213]. It exploits the magnetic properties of hemozoin (malaria pigment) nanocrystals and provides the quantification value in 10 min [213]. Also, the laser-based non-invasive method of malaria detection is an excellent step in the pain-free detection of malaria. It may be developed into a handy instrument to screen large populations without a sophisticated setup, similar to the infrared thermometer.
Malaria is an infectious disease affecting people globally. Without prompt diagnosis and treatment, the condition can worsen, which is why proper diagnosis and treatment are essential. Overall, the progress in eliminating malaria globally has been satisfactory, and the number of malaria cases has declined [214]. Also, the available therapeutics in the form of drugs and vaccine have played a significant role in restraining malaria aftermaths. The presence of diagnostic approaches for malaria detection has also made it possible to reach the last corner of society. But still, diagnosis of asymptomatic malaria and removal of false-positive results even after a recovery has remained the bottleneck for accurate diagnosis for containing the spread of malaria. Moreover, the lack of a highly efficient vaccine has also hampered malaria infection preventive measures, especially in African regions. In addition, the growing concern about parasite resistance to the available medicines has worsened the scenario. Therefore, it is difficult to assess how close we are to the 2021 theme of malaria day, i.e. 'Zeroing in on malaria elimination.' Hence, we must align with the 2022 theme of malaria day by focusing on new and innovative approaches to reduce malaria's burden and save lives.
The authors thank the Department of Biotechnology, GOI, Department of Science and Technology, GOI, University Grants Commission, GOI, Indian Council of Medical Research, GOI, and Central University of Rajasthan for providing funds and infrastructure facilities. The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Shaqra University for supporting this work.
HT, PB, SS, HA, BSA, SR, and MRH wrote the review paper. HA and TKB did the final editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Himani Tripathi thanks DST, Government of India, for providing INSPIRE fellowship (IF190844), and Preshita Bhalerao thanks UGC, Government of India, for providing NFSC [F. 82-44/2020 (SA-III), UGC-Ref no.: 201610039436] fellowship to pursue their doctoral degree. Hemant Arya thanks the Indian Council of Medical Research, Government of India, for the Research Associate Fellowship (ISRM/11(35)/2019). Sujeet Singh and Tarun Kumar Bhatt thank DBT, Government of India, for project funding (BT/PR24504/NER/95/746/2017). Bader S. Alotaibi, Summya Rashid and Mohammad R. Hasan appreciate the funding from Deanship of Scientific Research at Shaqra University for supporting this work.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Himani Tripathi, Email: tripathi.himani97@gmail.com.
Preshita Bhalerao, Email: preshita09@gmail.com.
Sujeet Singh, Email: sujeet.smile@gmail.com.
Hemant Arya, Email: arya.hemant2009@gmail.com.
Bader Saud Alotaibi, Email: balotaibi@su.edu.sa.
Summya Rashid, Email: s.abdulrashid@psau.edu.sa.
Mohammad Raghibul Hasan, Email: malhasn@su.edu.sa.
Tarun Kumar Bhatt, Email: tarun@curaj.ac.in.
Not applicable.